Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett Kavanaugh's tears yesterday were those of a True American Patriot. A man who Loves This Land and is unafraid to show it and, get this!, unafraid to embrace his femininity, if that is what it takes. What liberals call his "lies" may in fact just be that he has his Eyes on The Prize. When Mr Kavanaugh sat there crying at the table, he showed he is truly Able to service President Trump is all ways. When will we embrace this saintly servant?

Too bad Kavanaugh has not been nominated to service Trump. Had he been, I suspect he would get little complaint from the left.

psssssst! Jeff!

that post you're replying to was meant as satire. It's not a real Kavanaugh supporter.

Sadly, satire is log dead. It is a lost art that is no longer applicable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett Kavanaugh's tears yesterday were those of a True American Patriot. A man who Loves This Land and is unafraid to show it and, get this!, unafraid to embrace his femininity, if that is what it takes. What liberals call his "lies" may in fact just be that he has his Eyes on The Prize. When Mr Kavanaugh sat there crying at the table, he showed he is truly Able to service President Trump is all ways. When will we embrace this saintly servant?

Looks like the Russian troll farm is up and running.

That was snark from a liberal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would not mind being a fly on Kavanaugh's wall this evening, but I would also really love to be a fly on the wall in the office when Mark Judge has been meeting with his attorneys to craft his statements thus far. I think Brett Kavanaugh is on the record saying Mark Judge is a brilliant writer, so hopefully Brett supports a nice, close look at his books and articles.

Hi book got a mediocre review by the NYT. You do realize “Wasted”
Is not a work of literature but an AA fueled apology for those Judge did wrong. Wonder what he calls Chrissy in the book?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's lying about something.
She is telling the truth.
She was likely a mousey un popular girl of so so intelligence trying to hang out with much smarter, popular, domineering boys. Things got out of control, and she never forgot it. They forgot it soon after.
Most popular people NEVER remember the other folks. You see them two years later in the grocery store and they don't know who you were.

Girls of mediocre intelligence who are so traumatized they screw up the first two years of undergrad don’t usually go on to earn multiple graduate degrees from excellent universities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett Kavanaugh's tears yesterday were those of a True American Patriot. A man who Loves This Land and is unafraid to show it and, get this!, unafraid to embrace his femininity, if that is what it takes. What liberals call his "lies" may in fact just be that he has his Eyes on The Prize. When Mr Kavanaugh sat there crying at the table, he showed he is truly Able to service President Trump is all ways. When will we embrace this saintly servant?

Looks like the Russian troll farm is up and running.

That was snark from a liberal.

The first para or the second sentence?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what comes out in the FBI report, no Dems will vote for BK anyways.

Who really thinks that this BS calling for a FBI investigation will change anything.

So if the FBI clears him, then it will be we can’t vote for him cuz abortion, gun laws, etc.. it will then be another set off issues.

How exactly would the FBI “clear” him? Not turning up anything new would surprise no one, and wouldn’t mean that he has been proven innocent.

He's presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. And I know....I know....it's not a trial, but the same principle applies: you can't prove a negative.

SHE has to prove that he's guilty, not the other way around.

Huh? She does not have to prove anything. She just has to be truthful. Even Republicans found her credible.

She sounded emotional and compelling. However, the gaps, inconsistencies and lack of corroboration are overwhelming. She suffers the most traumatic event of her life and can't recall how she got home despite being stranded miles from home in the pre-cell phone age yet specifically remembers she had a single beer? Not credible.

So if she wanted to lie, why wouldn't she just say "I took a bus home?"

Because you could easily show that wasn't true. Serious Q. Why did her attorneys not tell her -- as the NYTimes and numerous emails establish -- that the Senate Jd. Committee offered to come to her in California over a week ago. Ford herself is likely innocent, but her attorney (recommended by Senate Democrats) were playing a delay game in hopes that more bad coverage would push BK to drop out. Telling their client that the Senate wouldn't come to her in CA. Telling the Senate she needed to drive to Washington DC from CA because she wouldnt fly! Suggests like the attorneys were embedded with the Democrats.

Basically this. If she were to say she took a bus home, then that would leave her claim open to being demonstrated false depending on the existence of bus routes at the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's lying about something.
She is telling the truth.
She was likely a mousey un popular girl of so so intelligence trying to hang out with much smarter, popular, domineering boys. Things got out of control, and she never forgot it. They forgot it soon after.
Most popular people NEVER remember the other folks. You see them two years later in the grocery store and they don't know who you were.

Girls of mediocre intelligence who are so traumatized they screw up the first two years of undergrad don’t usually go on to earn multiple graduate degrees from excellent universities.

And, she cannot remember if she gave a copy of her therapists notes to WAPO two months ago......there is something going on here besides intelligence or non-intelligence. Also, her statement says "me and four others" were at the party. This certainly doesn't sound like someone from an affluent background who has multiple degrees. Not knowing that the committee would have come to her, not knowing that her lawyers said she wouldn't fly, etc.

There is something wrong here--far more than the event described in the accusation.

[Anonymous]

I'm just picturing Brett Kavanaugh with a boombox standing outside Clarence Thomas's window, wearing a shirt that says I BELIEVE YOU.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what comes out in the FBI report, no Dems will vote for BK anyways.

Who really thinks that this BS calling for a FBI investigation will change anything.

So if the FBI clears him, then it will be we can’t vote for him cuz abortion, gun laws, etc.. it will then be another set off issues.

How exactly would the FBI “clear” him? Not turning up anything new would surprise no one, and wouldn’t mean that he has been proven innocent.

He's presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. And I know....I know....it's not a trial, but the same principle applies: you can't prove a negative.

SHE has to prove that he's guilty, not the other way around.

Huh? She does not have to prove anything. She just has to be truthful. Even Republicans found her credible.

So are you saying that an allegation, even if the person making it sounds credible, is sufficient to ruin someone’s career? Do you realize what that opens the door for? She essentially has no corroborating evidence, and the people she identified as being in a position to support her accusation either denied knowledge or outright refuted it. I can’t understand how so many are willing to destroy this guy (or anyone) over an unsubstantiated allegation. I guess I do understand - you hate his politics and/or the person who nominated him.

What? Whose career is getting ruined, exactly? Cavanaugh has a lifetime judgeship, just not at the court he wants. You make it sound like he's about to go panhandle at the corner of 18th and K. He was fine before this nomination and he'll be fine after it. His children will retain their well fed look, I assure you.

That's what liberals tell themselves to assuage their guilt for destroying a man.

Sexual assault as a hobby => nope, no guilt about him not getting the job he applied for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's lying about something.
She is telling the truth.
She was likely a mousey un popular girl of so so intelligence trying to hang out with much smarter, popular, domineering boys. Things got out of control, and she never forgot it. They forgot it soon after.
Most popular people NEVER remember the other folks. You see them two years later in the grocery store and they don't know who you were.

Girls of mediocre intelligence who are so traumatized they screw up the first two years of undergrad don’t usually go on to earn multiple graduate degrees from excellent universities.

And, she cannot remember if she gave a copy of her therapists notes to WAPO two months ago......there is something going on here besides intelligence or non-intelligence. Also, her statement says "me and four others" were at the party. This certainly doesn't sound like someone from an affluent background who has multiple degrees. Not knowing that the committee would have come to her, not knowing that her lawyers said she wouldn't fly, etc.

There is something wrong here--far more than the event described in the accusation.

Based on your excellent sleuthing, she can't possibly have been rich enough to go to that elite private school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm just picturing Brett Kavanaugh with a boombox standing outside Clarence Thomas's window, wearing a shirt that says I BELIEVE YOU.

LOL!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's lying about something.
She is telling the truth.
She was likely a mousey un popular girl of so so intelligence trying to hang out with much smarter, popular, domineering boys. Things got out of control, and she never forgot it. They forgot it soon after.
Most popular people NEVER remember the other folks. You see them two years later in the grocery store and they don't know who you were.

Girls of mediocre intelligence who are so traumatized they screw up the first two years of undergrad don’t usually go on to earn multiple graduate degrees from excellent universities.

Or become professors at STANFORD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what comes out in the FBI report, no Dems will vote for BK anyways.

Who really thinks that this BS calling for a FBI investigation will change anything.

So if the FBI clears him, then it will be we can’t vote for him cuz abortion, gun laws, etc.. it will then be another set off issues.

How exactly would the FBI “clear” him? Not turning up anything new would surprise no one, and wouldn’t mean that he has been proven innocent.

He's presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. And I know....I know....it's not a trial, but the same principle applies: you can't prove a negative.

SHE has to prove that he's guilty, not the other way around.

Huh? She does not have to prove anything. She just has to be truthful. Even Republicans found her credible.

So are you saying that an allegation, even if the person making it sounds credible, is sufficient to ruin someone’s career? Do you realize what that opens the door for? She essentially has no corroborating evidence, and the people she identified as being in a position to support her accusation either denied knowledge or outright refuted it. I can’t understand how so many are willing to destroy this guy (or anyone) over an unsubstantiated allegation. I guess I do understand - you hate his politics and/or the person who nominated him.

What? Whose career is getting ruined, exactly? Cavanaugh has a lifetime judgeship, just not at the court he wants. You make it sound like he's about to go panhandle at the corner of 18th and K. He was fine before this nomination and he'll be fine after it. His children will retain their well fed look, I assure you.

That's what liberals tell themselves to assuage their guilt for destroying a man.

Sexual assault as a hobby => nope, no guilt about him not getting the job he applied for.

No evidence of that. That's why liberals feel guilty.....they know it. This is all about Roe v Wade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:It seems like just yesterday that posters were calling me an idiot because I wanted the FBI to investigate Kavanaugh. I was being told that I didn't understand how things work and that the FBI would never investigate this because the alleged assault didn't occur on federal property and neither the alleged victim or perpetrator were federal employees.

In fact, when I wrote this post which predicted exactly the type of hearing that was eventually held:

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/753686.page

I was repeatedly told that I the FBI could not investigate and given a bunch of different reasons why not. I'm ashamed of my ignorance.

To be fair, it's not an investigation in the way that people tend to think about criminal FBI investigations. It's a background investigation in which the FBI will take statements from individuals and present them to the Senate. They don't come to a conclusion. An FBI criminal investigation is predicated on a federal criminal act the FBI concludes has taken place that the FBI is attempting to prove beyond a reasonable doubt with supporting evidence that is presented to a prosecutor.

I think that is all most people expected. The precedents were Thomas and Tower. Those were background investigations as well.

And if they find nothing, will you accept it?

I would have if they had done it before we saw he is a deeply disturbing person. I wouldn't want to live on his street, let alone have him be a SCJ. In trying to use Trump's approach, he came across as unfit for any job involving humans or animals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what comes out in the FBI report, no Dems will vote for BK anyways.

Who really thinks that this BS calling for a FBI investigation will change anything.

So if the FBI clears him, then it will be we can’t vote for him cuz abortion, gun laws, etc.. it will then be another set off issues.

How exactly would the FBI “clear” him? Not turning up anything new would surprise no one, and wouldn’t mean that he has been proven innocent.

He's presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. And I know....I know....it's not a trial, but the same principle applies: you can't prove a negative.

SHE has to prove that he's guilty, not the other way around.

Huh? She does not have to prove anything. She just has to be truthful. Even Republicans found her credible.

No, that just means she believes what she says. It doesn't prove that she's correct. Otherwise, my neighbor can honestly think I was the one who robbed his house last night, testify to that and sound credible, and I'm convicted without evidence.

Well, if your competent and trustworthy neighbor who has socialized with you extensively says that she is 100% sure that you are the one who shoved her into a room and proceeded to grope her with your hand over her mouth in the daylight hours, she’s probably right.