Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If anything they will view this as being politically motivated and will come out in support of Moore with greater enthusiasm than before this news broke. It is the reality of the politics of Alabama whether liberals like it or not.

However, if additional credible information does surface then the situation may change.

Nothing will change their opinions. They know he dated a 14 yo girl and they don’t care.

It’s not like she was 12.

I just threw up a little bit in my mouth. Moore and his supporters are vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the National Review:

If you believe Moore’s denials, you have to believe that four of these women, with no evidence that they know each other or ever met each other, all decided to lie when the Washington Post showed up at their door, that they all spontaneously made up a story that they were able to recount in detail in multiple retellings to reporters over a period of weeks, and they all chose to make up similar stories about Moore’s sexual pursuit.

The angry statement from Moore called the women’s claims “completely false” but so far, no one has been able to point to any contradictions, incongruence, or demonstrably false claims within their stories. For example, if events did not occur as they describe, did Moore know these women? Did he ever interact with them? Was he not in the time and place they described in their stories? Did he ever have an interaction with them that would provide a potential motive to make a false accusation against them? Did he ever rule against any of them, or a member if their families or a friend in his years as a judge? If a part of the accusers’ story does not check out, it changes the calculus of this story. But so far we just have a blanket denial with no further details.

A variation of Occam’s Razor declares that the simplest explanation is the most likely one. You can either believe that Moore behaved in the way the women describe – accounting for any faults of memory in the forty or so years since then – or you can believe that they all chose, spontaneously, to partake in an elaborate conspiracy to destroy his reputation, an effort that they no doubt understood would lead to making enemies.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/453629/roy-moore-and-occams-razor

And what do these women gain from telling their Roy Moore stories? Money? No. Fame in a good way? No. There are zero benefits. Here's the creep's twitter: https://twitter.com/MooreSenate?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

That fool went to West Point and was stationed in Georgia and Germany before being in the military police in Vietnam where he harassed the soldiers forced to be in that ridiculous war. He was a frickin Lt Neidermyer from Animal House. 1978 film wildly popular. Granted Moore got college paid for but did that mean he had to harass and possible cause death/maiming of persons forced to go to Vietnam? Subordinates or even peers might have considered harming him?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/16/nyregion/16guard.springer.html

You have no way of knowing what they gain. I do know that one of the accusers is a Dem activist - she's already been exposed. My guess is this was pre-planned between she and the WaPo.

What turned her into a "Dem activist"? Perhaps it was having a skeevy man twice her age make moves on her when she was a teenager. And then he went into politics. Good for her for trying to bring him down.

Do I care if she's a Dem activist? No. Do I care that 4 women were approached as young teens, NOT late teens looking 24, by Moore? Yes I do in the same way that Kevin Spacey hit on that 14 year old who looked like a 10-16 year old depending on individual maturation. In that case did no one at Netfix ever have an inkling? I bet they did.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a13515042/roy-moore-14-year-old-alabama-gop-defend/
Esquire has a good article . Moore's defenders? What's their history with women? Maybe some in Alabama will vote Dem due to the tax plans afloat like voters did in VA and NJ. But I guess people in bmfk AL don't earn/contribute enough to have a problem since we fund them.

But wait. There is something that can get them in the Repugs plans. Or at least one of them. SEC-football conference of Alabama and Auburn. Repeal of game seats deduction: House- College Athletic Event Seating Rights
Under the provision, the special rule that provides a charitable deduction of 80 percent of the
amount paid for the right to purchase tickets for athletic events would be repealed.

Senate- The proposal amends section 170(l) to provide that no charitable deduction shall be
allowed for any amount described in paragraph 170(l)(2), generally, a payment to an institution
of higher education in exchange for which the payor receives the right to purchase tickets or
seating at an athletic event, as described in greater detail above.

Each uses right to purchase? What if the tickets come with the donation? Auburn football donors get season tickets for $3575 per seat and can now write off 80% or 2860. If an individual is in these brackets we are supporting this much of the seat:
.25*2860=715 and maybe 4 seats=2860
.35*2860=1001>4004 for 4 seats
.396*2860=1133

http://www.auburntigers.com/tigersunlimited/3_premium_seating_football.html proof is online and blatant. Note the Auburn v Alabama game is sold out. All the good seats are gone for another game so how many are in the pass down from relatives category and give money? https://ev12.evenue.net/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/SEGetEventInfo?ticketCode=GS%3AAUBURN%3AF17%3A06%3A&linkID=auburn&shopperContext=&pc=&caller=&appCode=&groupCode=FBSG&cgc=

[Anonymous]

The Post hates Moore. They endorsed his opponent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

If anything they will view this as being politically motivated and will come out in support of Moore with greater enthusiasm than before this news broke. It is the reality of the politics of Alabama whether liberals like it or not.

However, if additional credible information does surface then the situation may change.

Nothing will change their opinions. They know he dated a 14 yo girl and they don’t care.

Moore denies his involvement with the 14 year old. Will most Republican Alabamans believe Moore or the WAPO? Make no mistake they believe Moore because the msm has zero credibility with most Republicans and less than zero credibility with Alabamans other than those who are already committed to the Democratic nominee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
The Washington Post has positioned itself
as part of "The Resistance". Enough said.

Enough said?
For the last 8 years, FOX News, Breitbart, Daily Caller, and I'm sure every other news source you "trust" were quite solidly "the anti-Obama Resistance" - and continue to quite solidly be the anti-Democrat Resistance.

What do you have to say about that?

And... just because you don't like what the Washington Post is saying doesn't make it untrue. Sorry, but they don't have to make stuff up about Trump, Moore et cetera. Moore and the rest *actually are* pretty awful people and all WaPo has to do is stand around and wait for the apples to fall from the tree. Truth is stranger than fiction with today's GOP and the WaPo articles practically write themselves.

[Anonymous]

Ann Coulter said Moore's child molesting was OK "because it was 50 years ago." Um NO. That it happened several decades ago does not make it OK. You are disgusting, Ann Coulter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If anything they will view this as being politically motivated and will come out in support of Moore with greater enthusiasm than before this news broke. It is the reality of the politics of Alabama whether liberals like it or not.

However, if additional credible information does surface then the situation may change.

Nothing will change their opinions. They know he dated a 14 yo girl and they don’t care.

Moore denies his involvement with the 14 year old. Will most Republican Alabamans believe Moore or the WAPO? Make no mistake they believe Moore because the msm has zero credibility with most Republicans and less than zero credibility with Alabamans other than those who are already committed to the Democratic nominee.

No, that's not actually what he said. He said "she's lying" and "I don't remember her" - not "I didn't do it." He's already admitted to pursuing and preying on teenage girls. It's just this one who he's taking exception on... and with parsed words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ann Coulter said Moore's child molesting was OK "because it was 50 years ago." Um NO. That it happened several decades ago does not make it OK. You are disgusting, Ann Coulter.

Liar. Yet again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eleven pages. Can't read through.

Any concrete evidence on this?

Nope

Maybe not, but common sense is a bitch, ain't it?

[Anonymous]

I don't see what the big deal is. I mean, it's not like he knelt during the National Anthem or something...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ann Coulter said Moore's child molesting was OK "because it was 50 years ago." Um NO. That it happened several decades ago does not make it OK. You are disgusting, Ann Coulter.

Liar. Yet again.

Excuse me?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=La34C5eKvw8

Dipsh*t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ann Coulter said Moore's child molesting was OK "because it was 50 years ago." Um NO. That it happened several decades ago does not make it OK. You are disgusting, Ann Coulter.

Liar. Yet again.

DP. Link to story with a video clip of Coulter's comments on Fox News:https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/ann-coulter-defends-roy-moores-creepy-predation-of-underage-girls-this-was-nearly-50-years-ago/

I guess she'll be defending Bill Clinton in the next couple decades, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If anything they will view this as being politically motivated and will come out in support of Moore with greater enthusiasm than before this news broke. It is the reality of the politics of Alabama whether liberals like it or not.

However, if additional credible information does surface then the situation may change.

Nothing will change their opinions. They know he dated a 14 yo girl and they don’t care.

Moore denies his involvement with the 14 year old. Will most Republican Alabamans believe Moore or the WAPO? Make no mistake they believe Moore because the msm has zero credibility with most Republicans and less than zero credibility with Alabamans other than those who are already committed to the Democratic nominee.

No, that's not actually what he said. He said "she's lying" and "I don't remember her" - not "I didn't do it." He's already admitted to pursuing and preying on teenage girls. It's just this one who he's taking exception on... and with parsed words.

He said he had gone out with teenagers - preying on them is your editorialization. He also said that he does not even remember the 14 year old. Republicans in Alabama will believe him over the wapo any day of the week. Even those who did not care for Moore and voted for Strange will be gungho for Moore because they believe the wapo report was a hatchet job irrespective of whether it was or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Which is worse - the last minute fake news bombshell or the concerted effort of both the left and never trumpers that is obvious?

All you people who are questioning the timing—seems like you want to prevent Alabamans from hearing about Roy Moore before they send him to the senate for 6 years. You make everything sound like a conspiracy but basically you want to keep Alabama residents from hearing any negative news.

The WaPo’s endorsement of the opposition can before the story. And they drum up an activist at random?

What "endorsement"? The WaPo is a local paper. They do local endorsements shortly before an election (DC, Maryland, Virginia) and national elections. When do they ever do official endorsements for a state election that's not local?

You people just make stuff up left and right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If anything they will view this as being politically motivated and will come out in support of Moore with greater enthusiasm than before this news broke. It is the reality of the politics of Alabama whether liberals like it or not.

However, if additional credible information does surface then the situation may change.

Nothing will change their opinions. They know he dated a 14 yo girl and they don’t care.

Moore denies his involvement with the 14 year old. Will most Republican Alabamans believe Moore or the WAPO? Make no mistake they believe Moore because the msm has zero credibility with most Republicans and less than zero credibility with Alabamans other than those who are already committed to the Democratic nominee.

No, that's not actually what he said. He said "she's lying" and "I don't remember her" - not "I didn't do it." He's already admitted to pursuing and preying on teenage girls. It's just this one who he's taking exception on... and with parsed words.

A 30 something year old dating teenagers is just yuck. Even back in the 70s.
He said he had gone out with teenagers - preying on them is your editorialization. He also said that he does not even remember the 14 year old. Republicans in Alabama will believe him over the wapo any day of the week. Even those who did not care for Moore and voted for Strange will be gungho for Moore because they believe the wapo report was a hatchet job irrespective of whether it was or not.