Precisely. They want actual evidence, not a last minute smear campaign by the opposition. |
The WaPo’s endorsement of the opposition can before the story. And they drum up an activist at random? |
Nothing will change their opinions. They know he dated a 14 yo girl and they don’t care. |
| Roy Moore already admitted to his encounters with some of his other teen accusers like 17 year old Deason on Sean Hannity's show. And, he LIED about some of the details to try and cover his tracks, like claiming Deason lied about wine at the pizzeria "because Etowah county was a dry county" - except, that Etowah repealed that years prior and it's been confirmed that the pizzeria did in fact sell wine at that time. Moore is lying and covering up. He needs to step down. Period. |
|
Shhhh! WaPo doesn't want anyone to know to REAL truth. The smear campaign is all that matters.
They simply MUST win this election. At. Any. Cost.
|
"A member of resist" - again, fail on your part, because resist osn't an organization and doesn't have membership. But even if that were true, did you ever consider the possibility that someone might oppose Moore because of her awful childhood experience with him? |
It’s not like she was 12. |
|
Roy Moore was the one who decided to run for the US Senate. It’s kind of hilarious he seems to think that he shouldn’t be subject to national scrutiny.
Stuff that he might get away with in a sleepy election to state office ain’t gonna fly in the big leagues. |
LMAO! Sorry, no. WaPo has 30, THIRTY independent sources that all corroborate their story. Roy Moore on the other hand has already made partial admissions about pursuing teenage girls when he was in his early thirties, and LIED about the details, like falsely claiming the county was dry and wine wasn't available. Moore is already a proven liar and WaPo is far more credible. Sorry about that, sucks to be you. |
Pedophilia is OK because "Mary and Joseph" or some such. |
|
Pedophilia is far superior to a...gasp....Democrat. |
In your dreams. |
Please be quiet about that. |
Was the interview and leaked book excerpt from Donna Brazille also a smear campaign when the WaPo broke it on the eve of the VA election, and this page was full of threads about how Northam would lose because of Democrats in fighting? And Trump was using it to demand that DOJ lock Clinton up? With the opinion that the VA election is a bellwether for the 2018 races? A week ago, conservatives loved the Post. Read and remember: http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/679822.page The Washington Post’s Editorial Board is liberal. It’s news organization does tough reporting on both sides of the aisle. This is not Fox, where Sean Hannity is considered a reporter, or Alex Jones, who admits his news is for “entertainment purposes he only” (ahhmm Pizzagate) or Rush calling the Hurricane that walloped Puerto Rico Fake News, or Breitbart. The WaPo is a serious news organization that regularly wins Pulitzers. If it is shown that this has not been reported honestly and transparently, people will lose their jobs, and the Post will print a retraction. And a lawyer, I find it interesting that Roy Moore is not taking about a libel suit. It is harder for a public figure to sue. But he could win if the Post created this out of thin air. So why isn’t he? |