Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.

We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.

We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.

We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.

We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.

We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.

These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.

They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.

Ugh. Can we get some realistic proposals? I see everyone is still at the denial stage of grief.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.

We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.

We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.

We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.

We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.

We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.

These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.

They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.

Ugh. Can we get some realistic proposals? I see everyone is still at the denial stage of grief.

No. It needs to be done. Again, Clinton *was* impeached for less.

And, lying to Congress is a crime. United States Code, Title 18, section 1001, and it has been used on Rod Blagojevich, Jeffrey Skilling and many others. There is no legitimate reason why it can't or shouldn't be prosecuted.

If Republicans get upset about it they void and completely destroy their "law and order" cred.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.

We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.

We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.

We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.

We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.

We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.

These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.

They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.

Ugh. Can we get some realistic proposals? I see everyone is still at the denial stage of grief.

No. It needs to be done. Again, Clinton *was* impeached for less.

And, lying to Congress is a crime. United States Code, Title 18, section 1001, and it has been used on Rod Blagojevich, Jeffrey Skilling and many others. There is no legitimate reason why it can't or shouldn't be prosecuted.

If Republicans get upset about it they void and completely destroy their "law and order" cred.

It’s not going to happen. Be realistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.

We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.

We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.

We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.

We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.

We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.

These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.

They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.

Ugh. Can we get some realistic proposals? I see everyone is still at the denial stage of grief.

No. It needs to be done. Again, Clinton *was* impeached for less.

And, lying to Congress is a crime. United States Code, Title 18, section 1001, and it has been used on Rod Blagojevich, Jeffrey Skilling and many others. There is no legitimate reason why it can't or shouldn't be prosecuted.

If Republicans get upset about it they void and completely destroy their "law and order" cred.

It’s not going to happen. Be realistic.

If it doesn't happen, we deserve answers why. And those who could have made it happen, but decided not to, need to be removed and replaced with people who will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.

We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.

We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.

We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.

We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.

We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.

These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.

They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.

Ugh. Can we get some realistic proposals? I see everyone is still at the denial stage of grief.

No. It needs to be done. Again, Clinton *was* impeached for less.

And, lying to Congress is a crime. United States Code, Title 18, section 1001, and it has been used on Rod Blagojevich, Jeffrey Skilling and many others. There is no legitimate reason why it can't or shouldn't be prosecuted.

If Republicans get upset about it they void and completely destroy their "law and order" cred.

It’s not going to happen. Be realistic.

Why do you support a SCOTUS that is full of proven liars, has zero integrity, and zero credibility?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“There is no constitutional right to abortion.”

Forced birth is slavery. Slavery is not allowed per the constitution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“There is no constitutional right to abortion.”

Forced birth is slavery. Slavery is not allowed per the constitution.

Since no legal right to an abortion doesn’t equate to slavery, you have no point.

[Anonymous]

Thread I started got locked so will try here.

I’m not understanding the logic. Have seen in many comments from anti-choice posters that “not to worry” because there will be exceptions that allow abortion in the case of incest or rape. My genuine question is this:

If all life must be protected from the moment of conception because the embryo/fetus is an “innocent life” then why is an embryo/fetus conceived as a result of rape or incest not protected? Does the route of conception destroy the “sanctity of life” in those cases? I don’t understand the logic.

Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thread I started got locked so will try here.

I’m not understanding the logic. Have seen in many comments from anti-choice posters that “not to worry” because there will be exceptions that allow abortion in the case of incest or rape. My genuine question is this:

If all life must be protected from the moment of conception because the embryo/fetus is an “innocent life” then why is an embryo/fetus conceived as a result of rape or incest not protected? Does the route of conception destroy the “sanctity of life” in those cases? I don’t understand the logic.

Thank you.

None of it is rational.

Pure religious extremism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thread I started got locked so will try here.

I’m not understanding the logic. Have seen in many comments from anti-choice posters that “not to worry” because there will be exceptions that allow abortion in the case of incest or rape. My genuine question is this:

If all life must be protected from the moment of conception because the embryo/fetus is an “innocent life” then why is an embryo/fetus conceived as a result of rape or incest not protected? Does the route of conception destroy the “sanctity of life” in those cases? I don’t understand the logic.

Thank you.

None of it is rational.

Pure religious extremism.

Imposing religious belief on others is unconstitutional.

[Anonymous]

Why aren't people rioting in the streets for women like we did for black men 2 years ago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.

We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.

We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.

We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.

We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.

We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.

These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.

They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.

This. Nothing else matters. One of our three branches of government has become completely illegitimate. This needs to be addressed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why aren't people rioting in the streets for women like we did for black men 2 years ago?

They are out on the streets and I expect the protests will continue to grow. Womens March had millions on the streets protesting for less than this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.

We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.

We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.

We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.

We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.

We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.

These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.

They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.

Ugh. Can we get some realistic proposals? I see everyone is still at the denial stage of grief.

No. It needs to be done. Again, Clinton *was* impeached for less.

And, lying to Congress is a crime. United States Code, Title 18, section 1001, and it has been used on Rod Blagojevich, Jeffrey Skilling and many others. There is no legitimate reason why it can't or shouldn't be prosecuted.

If Republicans get upset about it they void and completely destroy their "law and order" cred.

Of course he was, because Republicans punch relentlessly, willing even the weakest of narratives into major public debates. Corporate Democrats keep going to a knife fight with a suitcase in hand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.

We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.

We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.

We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.

We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.

We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.

These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.

They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.

Ugh. Can we get some realistic proposals? I see everyone is still at the denial stage of grief.

No. It needs to be done. Again, Clinton *was* impeached for less.

And, lying to Congress is a crime. United States Code, Title 18, section 1001, and it has been used on Rod Blagojevich, Jeffrey Skilling and many others. There is no legitimate reason why it can't or shouldn't be prosecuted.

If Republicans get upset about it they void and completely destroy their "law and order" cred.

As much as you want it to be true.... NOT ONE of the Justices lied to Congress.

And, if you want to talk about prosecuting lying to Congress.... let's start with Brennan and Clapper.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/31/cia-director-john-brennan-lied-senate
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-11-17/lawmakers-resume-calls-for-james-clapper-perjury-charges