Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Not only are they vandals and arsonists, they are also terribly spellers.
Maybe they should have spent more time studying and less time protesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why aren't people rioting in the streets for women like we did for black men 2 years ago?

They are out on the streets and I expect the protests will continue to grow. Womens March had millions on the streets protesting for less than this.

Really? Not seeing much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not only are they vandals and arsonists, they are also terribly spellers.
Maybe they should have spent more time studying and less time protesting.

LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.

We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.

We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.

We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.

We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.

We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.

These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.

They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.

Ugh. Can we get some realistic proposals? I see everyone is still at the denial stage of grief.

No. It needs to be done. Again, Clinton *was* impeached for less.

And, lying to Congress is a crime. United States Code, Title 18, section 1001, and it has been used on Rod Blagojevich, Jeffrey Skilling and many others. There is no legitimate reason why it can't or shouldn't be prosecuted.

If Republicans get upset about it they void and completely destroy their "law and order" cred.

It’s not going to happen. Be realistic.

Why do you support a SCOTUS that is full of proven liars, has zero integrity, and zero credibility?

Because there are never going to be 2/3 of the Senate who will vote to make them go away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Now time for congress to listen to the American people and write some laws...

The laws will ban it nationwide.

The Dems don't have the votes. Will they ever?

My guess is that Dem controlled states will pass laws permitting elective abortion into the third trimester (ie, way beyond Roe), which will be viewed more horrifically than the R bans on abortion, and translate at the federal level into disastrous results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Now time for congress to listen to the American people and write some laws...

The laws will ban it nationwide.

The Dems don't have the votes. Will they ever?

My guess is that Dem controlled states will pass laws permitting elective abortion into the third trimester (ie, way beyond Roe), which will be viewed more horrifically than the R bans on abortion, and translate at the federal level into disastrous results.

No states allow for elective abortion in the third trimester. Abortions to safeguard the life of the mother or put fetus out of suffering (e.g., where all organs grow outside the body were permitted under the Roe/Casey framework.

[Anonymous]

Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.

It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.

It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.

Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.

It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.

Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.

Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.

It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.

Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.

Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.

I’m sure you blame Jews when temples are vandalized. Deal with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.

It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.

Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.

Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.

I’m sure you blame Jews when temples are vandalized. Deal with it.

What temples...what are you blabbering on about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.

It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.

Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.

Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.

I’m sure you blame Jews when temples are vandalized. Deal with it.

Hard to be upset about graffiti when women's lives are going to be destroyed. Where's your anger and horror about all the misery these new extremist laws are going to unleash on American women and their families?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.

It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.

Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.

Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.

I’m sure you blame Jews when temples are vandalized. Deal with it.

Hard to be upset about graffiti when women's lives are going to be destroyed. Where's your anger and horror about all the misery these new extremist laws are going to unleash on American women and their families?

It’s called “democracy” remember? Where the people’s representatives vote on laws based on the will of the voters. I’m told democracy is sacred—apparently that’s only when the left wants to use it for propaganda?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.

It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.

Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.

Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.

I’m sure you blame Jews when temples are vandalized. Deal with it.

Hard to be upset about graffiti when women's lives are going to be destroyed. Where's your anger and horror about all the misery these new extremist laws are going to unleash on American women and their families?

It’s called “democracy” remember? Where the people’s representatives vote on laws based on the will of the voters. I’m told democracy is sacred—apparently that’s only when the left wants to use it for propaganda?

The will of Americans is that abortion remain legal. Every single poll shows that.