Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the shooter had different-colored skin, the third victim would have been deemed a hero by the right for trying to disarm him with his own concealed Glock. The second victim would have been deemed a hero for trying to take him down with his skateboard.

Curious who the kid called after he killed the first person. And can you really KILL someone for grabbing you?! (We also don't know what happened before the video started)

And that was a plastic grocery bag with a light-ish object in it. It wasn't on fire and it certainly wasn't a Molotov cocktail.

I won’t speculate on Your other comments. The bag was on fire and look at how it flattened out and skidded when it hit the ground. That’s consistent with a liquid in the bag. Is your theory that somebody threw garbage at him while chasing him and then continued to chase him after the first shot?

Like I said above, people will see what they want to see (including me).

If only Kyle had been following the law...

Wonder what wil happen to his dad. A cop who knowingly committed a felony that directly led to multiple deaths.

If only the people shot had been following the law....

As for his dad, a lot of it will depend on whether Kyle is convicted or not. Think of it this way: if Kyle’s dad gave minor Kyle a gun and minor Kyle killed two home intruders in his home, nothing would happen to his dad. All of this is going to come down to whether Kyle was acting in self defense.

He illegally transported an illegal gun across state lines and fled the scene. Self-dfense doesn't even come into play because he committed multiple felonies just being there while armed.

Why would someone travel to another state’s protest armed unless you planned on killing someone? He was planning on killing protesters. He is a terrorist and should be charged as a terrorist.

He would be charged with terrorism and Trump would be calling him an animal if...

[Anonymous]

A Daily Caller reporter was a witness to the first shooting and was the person who removed his shirt to render the initial first aid. He will be giving a full account on Tucker Carlson tonight. He also interviewed the shooter before the incident. Apparently he was there as a medic (hence the gloves and bag). Partial interview here https://dailycaller.com/2020/08/26/alleged-kenosha-shooter-he-help-people-protect-property-before-shooting/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the shooter had different-colored skin, the third victim would have been deemed a hero by the right for trying to disarm him with his own concealed Glock. The second victim would have been deemed a hero for trying to take him down with his skateboard.

Curious who the kid called after he killed the first person. And can you really KILL someone for grabbing you?! (We also don't know what happened before the video started)

And that was a plastic grocery bag with a light-ish object in it. It wasn't on fire and it certainly wasn't a Molotov cocktail.

I won’t speculate on Your other comments. The bag was on fire and look at how it flattened out and skidded when it hit the ground. That’s consistent with a liquid in the bag. Is your theory that somebody threw garbage at him while chasing him and then continued to chase him after the first shot?

Like I said above, people will see what they want to see (including me).

If only Kyle had been following the law...

Wonder what wil happen to his dad. A cop who knowingly committed a felony that directly led to multiple deaths.

If only the people shot had been following the law....

As for his dad, a lot of it will depend on whether Kyle is convicted or not. Think of it this way: if Kyle’s dad gave minor Kyle a gun and minor Kyle killed two home intruders in his home, nothing would happen to his dad. All of this is going to come down to whether Kyle was acting in self defense.

He illegally transported an illegal gun across state lines and fled the scene. Self-dfense doesn't even come into play because he committed multiple felonies just being there while armed.

Why would someone travel to another state’s protest armed unless you planned on killing someone? He was planning on killing protesters. He is a terrorist and should be charged as a terrorist.

The prosecutor will certainly argue that. The defense will say he is just a stupid kid who got in over his head.

[Anonymous]

The only Illinois residents who go to Wisconsin with guns are hunters. In this case, it wasn't bucks, but people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A Daily Caller reporter was a witness to the first shooting and was the person who removed his shirt to render the initial first aid. He will be giving a full account on Tucker Carlson tonight. He also interviewed the shooter before the incident. Apparently he was there as a medic (hence the gloves and bag). Partial interview here https://dailycaller.com/2020/08/26/alleged-kenosha-shooter-he-help-people-protect-property-before-shooting/

“So people are getting injured, and our job is to protect this business, and apart of my job is to also help people,” Rittenhouse told McGinniss.

Who gave this 17 year old a "job"?!

[Anonymous]

Who takes a gun to a protest?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who takes a gun to a protest?!

Someone with delusions of grandeur. In this case the minor son of a cop.

[Anonymous]

I suspect his social media will be investigated. If he was posting some “hope to shoot some thugs” type stuff that will certainly color jury perceptions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A Daily Caller reporter was a witness to the first shooting and was the person who removed his shirt to render the initial first aid. He will be giving a full account on Tucker Carlson tonight. He also interviewed the shooter before the incident. Apparently he was there as a medic (hence the gloves and bag). Partial interview here https://dailycaller.com/2020/08/26/alleged-kenosha-shooter-he-help-people-protect-property-before-shooting/

“So people are getting injured, and our job is to protect this business, and apart of my job is to also help people,” Rittenhouse told McGinniss.

Who gave this 17 year old a "job"?!

This doughy chucklef#ck teenage Barney Fife likes to cosplay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A Daily Caller reporter was a witness to the first shooting and was the person who removed his shirt to render the initial first aid. He will be giving a full account on Tucker Carlson tonight. He also interviewed the shooter before the incident. Apparently he was there as a medic (hence the gloves and bag). Partial interview here https://dailycaller.com/2020/08/26/alleged-kenosha-shooter-he-help-people-protect-property-before-shooting/

“So people are getting injured, and our job is to protect this business, and apart of my job is to also help people,” Rittenhouse told McGinniss.

Who gave this 17 year old a "job"?!

What medic carries an AR-15?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I suspect his social media will be investigated. If he was posting some “hope to shoot some thugs” type stuff that will certainly color jury perceptions.

there were a lot of blue lives matter and white supremacy stuff

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: to

He had the legal right to be there (whether it was wise or not is another question). In most jurisdictions your right to self defense is very strong when you are legally somewhere you are allowed to be. Your right to self defense is strongest in your own property (home, car, work) and your right to self defense is incredibly weak if you are somewhere you don’t have a legal right to be (break in to the home of another). Whether he had no business there or not is irrelevant to his right to self defense.

Did he have a legal right to be there walking around with an AR15? Serious question, I don't know gun laws.

I know cops wouldn't have been able to tell his age just by passing him, but it's horrifying to me that I live in a country where a kid who knows he can't vote or buy cigarettes think he's in his right to brandish an assault rifle and "defend" whatever.

Wisconsin is an open carry state. Can legally openly carry a loaded firearm in Wisconsin with limited restrictions.

One of those limited restrictions being that you have to be 18, which he isn't.

So why isn't this open and shut felonh murder? Self defense is irrelevent when there's a felony being committed

Carrying an assault weapon in the midst of a tense protest is a form of natural selection.

Okay, I just looked it up. Wisconsin law says a person committing an unlawful act (17 year old open carrying) that provoked an attack may still claim self defense if the unlawful actor (17 year old) withdraws from the fight. Shooter turning his back and running away from the first person before shooting is probably going to save his ass here.

1. “the fight” would need to be a proportionate use of force. Unarmed person chasing you is not proportionate excuse to fire an AR-15
2. He is not licensed to open carry in WI as an IL resident. Brought a fire arm across state lines.

I think he’s still f#cked. And I hope this menace goes away for a long time.

Your number 1 is not correct. The proportionality required is not based on weapons. He simply needed to reasonably believe that his life was in imminent danger or that he was about to suffer grave bodily harm. He’ll claim he saw the person light the device on fire, throw it at him and continue to chase him. I think most reasonable people would fear for their lives or grave bodily harm in such A scenario.

He’ll rightly get popped on the illegal open carrying and unexpected the’ll be shown no mercy on that charge.

I am confused by some do the posts here. Shooter was clearly running away before the first shooting. I guess posters on here hate him so much that no credit is being given to him for clearly trying to withdraw. Don’t get me wrong: he shouldn’t have been there, he shouldn’t have been carrying, but once he tried to wave that should have been the end of it for everyone.

The people who were chasing him could have felt their life was in imminent danger. The dude was armed and loaded and was not a policeman. How did anyone know he wasn't going to start a mass shooting? Any aggression toward him was done in self-defense.

[Anonymous]

I’d love to think that this clown would be utterly disqualified from becoming a cop due to his actions.

But I feel like multiple departments would love to hire him. What a sick country we inhabit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d love to think that this clown would be utterly disqualified from becoming a cop due to his actions.

But I feel like multiple departments would love to hire him. What a sick country we inhabit.

+1

This is a really good exhibit of how far off the rails America is.

[Anonymous]

"The people who were chasing him could have felt their life was in imminent danger. The dude was armed and loaded and was not a policeman. How did anyone know he wasn't going to start a mass shooting? Any aggression toward him was done in self-defense."

This.