You’ll have to do better than share your feelings. Basis for your opinion? |
|
We have a great public school and our kids don’t have any special needs
They’re doing well in school and we’re saving a huge amount of money. We’ll definitely be able to send them to whatever college and grad school they want. Plus probably give them down payment money. Why fix what isn’t broke? |
DP. I fairness, the person who said the schools are clearly superior didn’t provide any reasoning behind her opinion either. |
|
You are missing the “why”. My kids grade in APS HS will have over 800+ kids next year. It will be even bigger when our younger kids get there and they already are freaking out about space.
We’ve been in public k-8. The academics have been excellent, but there are issues that come with size. I agree academics aren’t necessarily better at privates, but that’s not why we are sending our kids to private. Pretty fed up with APS at this point and their lack of foresight. And the focus groups upon focus groups to try to appease are endless with not much coming out of it. Not everyone leaves because of academics. |
We can do that and private. But, I agree, it’s better to stay public if college savings are impacted. |
We wouldn’t be able to send ours to our public HS if that was the criteria. Low diversity, HHI and parents up the teachers/admin ass about snowflake all of the time. |
+1 And why judge? |
| I have an SN kid and no way he will get that much support in private school like he does in public. They won't even consider his IEP and will make us pay more $$$ for additional services. So I am saving my sweet pennies to when he goes to college. |
I'm curious what problems you think come with size. I used to think big schools = problems (my own parents enrolled me in a private HS to avoid an large public HS). But my kids have gone to very large elementary and secondary schools in FCPS and I have changed my mind. These schools have been good at making it feel like there are smaller communities within schools and the size brings some real advantages--more varied classes--my kids could pretty much take any art form, have any extracurricular, choose among many languages etc. They also have wider networks of friends (in my "good" mid-sized private HS it got insular quick and kids would feel utterly destroyed by a fight with friends or a break up in part because everyone knew and there was no avoiding a clique). My kids also formed great relationships with teachers despite the size. The main downsides I think was there was a lot more competition for teams, roles in plays, leadership opportunities and there is limited personalized college counseling. The latter can be gotten privately and as such sidesteps some of the weirdness of private college counseling where one kid is tagged to be recommended for a particular school so other kids are steered away from it. |
True, but having lived in both, both are equally good. Not "best in the country", as FCPS tries to tout, but good. |
Catholic or private private? |
+1 Very insightful. Just look at the grown arse man in the "S" Class Mercedes who thinks you should get out of his way (and go where, exactly?). Case in point. |
| There are issues that come with size. Some of those issues are not negative. Students learn to navigate a larger environment. They aren't coddled. There is a much wider, varied social environment. They have more freedom socially. There are more students/groups to choose from to find where they fit in, or easier to reinvent themselves. I went to a MoCo W school w/700 in a class. I was happy to send our kids to a large FCPS high school and would not have mined if it were bigger. |
|
Where size matters for our particular situation: Class sizes for AP/Honors classes are usually 35-40 in our local high school. Freshman have hardly any chance of getting roles in the play, or on JV athletic teams, unless there is a specific freshman team.
Obviously depends on the specific high school. |