Republicans storm SCIF in violation of the rules

[Anonymous]

I hope McConnell will comment on this soon. He seems finally to be growing a backbone. let's see if it is continuing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hey.. why not.. the French stormed the Bastille, and look how that turned out.. French Independence day and the beheading of the elite. I'm sure Trumpsters would love that.

Trump is a member of the elites and his head would be the first to roll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hey.. why not.. the French stormed the Bastille, and look how that turned out.. French Independence day and the beheading of the elite. I'm sure Trumpsters would love that.

Trump is a member of the elites and his head would be the first to roll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gaetz wasn’t the only one who brought his phone into the SCIF. They should all be arrested, but that’s actually what they want. So what to do?

I don’t see the problem with arresting them. That is blatantly violating the rules which they certainly all must know. It’s anarchy.
- OP

Hahahahahahahahahaha

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Unauthorized access to a SCIF is a federal crime.

Charge them and arrest when Congress is not in session.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope McConnell will comment on this soon. He seems finally to be growing a backbone. let's see if it is continuing

McCarthy and Trump knew about it before it happened. McConnell was probably in on it, too.

[Anonymous]

https://twitter.com/RepAlexMooney/status/1187063885372841989


I cannot fathom that members of Congress really think this is okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m in Ohio. How do I find out if my congressman is part of this?

Who’s your congressman? First step in the process of elimination would be to see if he’s on the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs or Oversight Committees. If he is, then he’s participating in the hearings and therefore not part of this stunt.

David Joyce. I don’t believe he sits on any of those committees. I have always considered him somewhat reasonable, and would be very disappointed if he participated in this.

Is this him? Hard to tell...

[Anonymous]

Taking bets on whether they hid a recording device. Seems like a pretty quick sweep to secure the place.

[Anonymous]

Oh my gosh, they have lost their ever lovin' minds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Something is wrong with you that you are not outraged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/RepAlexMooney/status/1187063885372841989


I cannot fathom that members of Congress really think this is okay.

This is the important word in your sentence. There's no "thinking" there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that these documents are in a SCIF in the first place as the testimony is being hidden from the eyes of the American electorate reminds me of a Kings' Hawaiian commercial.

There are 40 GOP reps in the room as well as several GOP committee attorneys. They are using the same rules that, for example, the Benghazi committee used. Why was it okay then, but not now? I never saw the dems illegally storming the SCIF in protest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m in Ohio. How do I find out if my congressman is part of this?

Who’s your congressman? First step in the process of elimination would be to see if he’s on the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs or Oversight Committees. If he is, then he’s participating in the hearings and therefore not part of this stunt.

Ironically, there are, I think, 10 GOP reps who are on those committees who participated in the Trump sanctioned stunt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Yesterday the outrage was about Trump using the term lynching with regard to impeachment and then it turned out that several Democrats used the same term to describe the Clinton impeachment including Biden!

Such a lot of phony outrage!

Phony like our constitution.

Like I said, a constant state of outrage causes legitimate outrage to be dismissed.

Remember the boy who cried wolf .........

Again I ask you. Is this a legitimate outrage being obfuscated by excessive outrage or is this part of the outrage cloud of nonsense you are trying to denounce?

Of course, there are things that warrant outrage. I think Trump's putting the Kurds at risk is just terrible and inexcusable. But like I said Democrats go into a fit of outrage over anything and everything that Trump and the Republicans do. The net effect is that one gets desensitized to it.

BTW, i am not a Trump supporter. i did not vote for him but I know quite a few who have - some reluctantly - and trust me when I say they just ignore most of this faux outrage.

Why is this question so hard for you? Is tweeting from inside the SCIF outrage worthy or not?

I answered the question ..... it was not an answer that you liked. If national security was jeopardized it is a concern otherwise it is a procedural violation but hardly anything to get hysterical about.

Anyway, come tomorrow, this will recede into the background and we will have the next faux outrage of the day.

It is actually a Federal crime and is more egregious than anything Hillary did.