Republicans storm SCIF in violation of the rules

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don't they realize republicans are on the committee? Or are they just a bunch of grandstanding pr grubbers? I will bet on the second.

The second. They know. But they’re spreading misinformation that there are no Rs in the hearings, and it’s working. The Trumpies I know are all sharing stupid memes about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gaetz tweeted from inside a SCIF, he should legit spend the night in jail over that

He should be removed from his job for that. Seriously - people make mistakes with SCIFs often enough and even when it’s accidental, it can be a fireable offense. This was purposeful. My mind reels.

+1

Fire and prosecute them all for this stunt.

Omar is spot on:
https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1187039492256997378
"This is what happens when people elect members more interested in media hits than the protection of our national security ?????

FYI to everyone who is concerned about my security clearances, I at least know to not bring my cell phones to SCIF and follow protocol."

[Anonymous]

I want to know what Sandy Berger has to say.

[Anonymous]

Pwned by Omar.

Ouch.

[Anonymous]

They should be expelled if Nancy can come up with the votes. This is clearly “disorderly conduct” for which the Constitution permits expulsion.

[Anonymous]

They should lose their clearances, at least. And that's going to make dong their jobs pretty difficult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They should be expelled if Nancy can come up with the votes. This is clearly “disorderly conduct” for which the Constitution permits expulsion.

How can she not come up with the votes? This is indefensible, even by Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They should be expelled if Nancy can come up with the votes. This is clearly “disorderly conduct” for which the Constitution permits expulsion.

How can she not come up with the votes? This is indefensible, even by Republicans.

Kevin McCarthy wrote a statement supporting their action, when he was given a heads up about it beforehand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They should be expelled if Nancy can come up with the votes. This is clearly “disorderly conduct” for which the Constitution permits expulsion.

How can she not come up with the votes? This is indefensible, even by Republicans.

Kevin McCarthy wrote a statement supporting their action, when he was given a heads up about it beforehand.

Then he's an accessory to a crime, and should be expelled, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They should be expelled if Nancy can come up with the votes. This is clearly “disorderly conduct” for which the Constitution permits expulsion.

How can she not come up with the votes? This is indefensible, even by Republicans.

Kevin McCarthy wrote a statement supporting their action, when he was given a heads up about it beforehand.

Expell him too.

Maybe that’s their plan to get out of having to take a stand - perhaps they want to be able to giggle and say “I was no longer a representative so I couldn’t votesies! [shrug]” OP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They should be expelled if Nancy can come up with the votes. This is clearly “disorderly conduct” for which the Constitution permits expulsion.

How can she not come up with the votes? This is indefensible, even by Republicans.

Kevin McCarthy wrote a statement supporting their action, when he was given a heads up about it beforehand.

Then he's an accessory to a crime, and should be expelled, too.

Does Nancy have the votes to expel every single member of the Republican party?

Wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They should be expelled if Nancy can come up with the votes. This is clearly “disorderly conduct” for which the Constitution permits expulsion.

How can she not come up with the votes? This is indefensible, even by Republicans.

Takes 2/3s

[Anonymous]

When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Tan suit. Mustard. Bare arms. Be quiet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When you are outraged about everything, legitimate issues on which one should be outraged about gets overlooked or is assumed to be more of the same.

Lawbreaking here, lawbreaking there, lawbreaking everywhere.

As Whitaker says, breaking the law isn't a crime.