BRYC Coaches

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confused With the statements on Mikey taking the best teams. The 2002 team my daughter plays on was 8th in the CCL when Mikey took over, then went on to finish in ECNL Playoff spots 2 years in a row. She had an amazing 2 years playing for Mikey, every player on her team got better.

2004 team was not very good before last season also. They play nice soccer now and were the top ECNL team from Northern VA last year.

How many of those 04s returned this year?

Does that group have enough players to field a team this year? Maybe bryc and metro can share rosters?

There are 15 players with another 2 playing up?
17 players. Worry about you're own kids team....

15 players on bryc 04? I think not.

ummm.....sorry, but you are wrong, There are 15 players on the 04 team currently with 2 more playing up on the 03 team.

Why?

Why what?

If I had to guess, why short the 04s and add players to an already large team.

Isn’t a coaches job to maximize each player, if they are good enough to play up they should play up.

+1

If a coaches job is to maximize does BRYC have any 03 players playing up?

[Anonymous]

I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

+1

Is it about maximizing players, team or a coaches individual choices? Sounds like BRYC doesn’t have priorities in place or they basically lost it when Larry Best left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

+1

Is it about maximizing players, team or a coaches individual choices? Sounds like BRYC doesn’t have priorities in place or they basically lost it when Larry Best left.

Lol, sounds like BRYC 02 suck and 04 suck and a coach is doing everything he can to keep the best players from leaving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

+1

Is it about maximizing players, team or a coaches individual choices? Sounds like BRYC doesn’t have priorities in place or they basically lost it when Larry Best left.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

+1

Is it about maximizing players, team or a coaches individual choices? Sounds like BRYC doesn’t have priorities in place or they basically lost it when Larry Best left.

+1

There are priorities in place.
The question is who (or whom) benefits most from those priorities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

+1

Is it about maximizing players, team or a coaches individual choices? Sounds like BRYC doesn’t have priorities in place or they basically lost it when Larry Best left.

You realize these players played on the 03 WHEN Larry was there too right? This isn't a change. When the age groupings changed they stayed with the 03 team. That being said, both players played double digit games with the 04 team last season.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

+1

Is it about maximizing players, team or a coaches individual choices? Sounds like BRYC doesn’t have priorities in place or they basically lost it when Larry Best left.

You realize these players played on the 03 WHEN Larry was there too right? This isn't a change. When the age groupings changed they stayed with the 03 team. That being said, both players played double digit games with the 04 team last season.

The most talented 2005 player who would also be a top player on 2004 is staying with 2005 this year. Looks like BRYC want to help the 2005 age group grow. Last year 2003 players played up on my daughters 2002 team often, this year it is a 2 year age gap. There were no 2003 players rostered on the 2001 team because it is a 2 year jump and the 19s have a big player pool. Why would coach cut older players so he can take younger kids?

Posters need to start thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

They would be playing up 2 years, that’s a big jump, also pushes out older players in important recruiting years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

They would be playing up 2 years, that’s a big jump, also pushes out older players in important recruiting years.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

+1

Is it about maximizing players, team or a coaches individual choices? Sounds like BRYC doesn’t have priorities in place or they basically lost it when Larry Best left.

Lol, sounds like BRYC 02 suck and 04 suck and a coach is doing everything he can to keep the best players from leaving.

Sounds like you are a dumbass

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

+1

Is it about maximizing players, team or a coaches individual choices? Sounds like BRYC doesn’t have priorities in place or they basically lost it when Larry Best left.

Lol, sounds like BRYC 02 suck and 04 suck and a coach is doing everything he can to keep the best players from leaving.

Sounds like you are a dumbass

+1

[Anonymous]

Boys side went 4-2 against Loudoun this weekend in ECNL Matches. Nice start to the season

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the goal there is to maximize the 03s' team success. Playing them up with the 02s would not support this goal.

+1

Is it about maximizing players, team or a coaches individual choices? Sounds like BRYC doesn’t have priorities in place or they basically lost it when Larry Best left.

You realize these players played on the 03 WHEN Larry was there too right? This isn't a change. When the age groupings changed they stayed with the 03 team. That being said, both players played double digit games with the 04 team last season.

The most talented 2005 player who would also be a top player on 2004 is staying with 2005 this year. Looks like BRYC want to help the 2005 age group grow. Last year 2003 players played up on my daughters 2002 team often, this year it is a 2 year age gap. There were no 2003 players rostered on the 2001 team because it is a 2 year jump and the 19s have a big player pool. Why would coach cut older players so he can take younger kids?

Posters need to start thinking.

Last year, the 03s who played with the 02s weren't necessarily the best 03s.
They were 03s who needed a team to play on (other than the 03 team), or they were being stashed on the 02 roster in case they were needed for 03 play later in the year.

Look around and you'll see several of them are no longer with the club.