DP. It is quite possible to be concerned about both. Clearly, you’re not grasping this. |
When you discriminate against women in the pursuit of Christianity it's fine, but when Muslims do it, they're misogynistic haters. |
The only people outraged here are - as usual - liberals. Everyone else has been calmly explaining why this is not a big deal, yet you people have called him “American Taliban” and a potential rapist. Is it any wonder why he’s made this decision? Do you see how utterly looney you are and why someone would be proactive in protecting his reputation? Get a clue. |
That you can equate a man saying he doesn’t want to be alone with a particular woman, to the TALIBAN’s medieval restrictions on all women says more about you than any insult ever could. |
I’m not a liberal, despite your narrow minded stereotyping, but I still think Foster is a Neanderthal. |
So you can’t explain it? Got it. I can’t either-I’m embarrassed that our great country has candidates this backwards. |
You’re certainly entitled to your opinion, as are the rest of us who disagree. Given that this particular reporter clearly has her own agenda to begin with, I think he made the right call. |
You clearly can’t even read, so this is where I stop wasting my time on you. Buh-bye. |
Given that this story made news from CBS to the local mississippi papers, because of the candidate’s discriminatory behavior, i doubt that there are many who disagree. If there are, perhaps we should be encouraging women not to go into journalism because they won’t be permitted to cover Male subjects. |
| Until you have experienced a true Mississippi diva spinning a huge lie, spread through their sweet tea on the porch network under the watchful eye of the matriarch and patriarch, you all should heed Foster's common sense or wear a body cam. |
+100 |
| Maybe this guy would just really like some private time with a young male reporter. |
So you think if the paper assigned a different female reporter instead, this guy would be cool with it? Because it’s about this particular women, and not about restricting all women? |
Your calm explanations make sense under a caliphate and less so in our secular, egalitarian society where all normal people are rightfully baffled by this crazy man's statements. How about this: Your lawyer daughter can't pay off her school loans because the firm's biggest male client refuses to allow her to meet with him unless she brings along a male chaperone, and the client also won't pay for double billing. So they just give the client to the make lawyer and fire your daughter. Does that sound a little more outrageous to you? Or still ok because your daughter should be home fixing dinner and cleaning the floors instead of working and having a public life anyway? Maybe you'd like it better if there were all-female law firms that only served female clients because how dare those uppity women be comingling with men anyway. |
We're still waiting for you to back up this assertion |