Should McLean Pre-ECNL players consider Spirit DA?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
No you don’t get it. This de-escalates the ECNL vs DA debate. |
Anonymous
You mean on the boys side. The women are dominant, despite the younger teams results. This is a new angle on the same old BS on this forum. God, it gets old |
Anonymous
Howso? It would only push it back a year. The problem for DA is that if it doesn’t start at u13, girls may entrench at ECNL clubs. US Soccer wants to supplant it. That’s why the rumor makes no sense. The Hawks, PDA, etc will have nowhere else to go if they are successful. |
Anonymous
US Soccer knows they can’t supplant it. They don’t own the clubs. Who is the girls DA champion for the 18/19s last year? That ECNL club tells the story. If you think Kater, Heinrich’s and the rest did not build DA to find the best talent but to control everything than you are lost. |
Anonymous
As stated previously, US soccer did not build GDA so that they could scout from ECNL. They expanded to u13 age group pilots to supplant it, and they sure can, as they start to recruit the top talent to their clubs by tying it to NT spots as they have effectively done. They clearly intend for GDA to be the top tier and ECNL to be second tier and there is no reason to believe a made up rumor that they are pulling the u13 pilots. In fact, the evidence is to the opposite, that they plan to expand it to a standard age group. If you don’t believe that, then please show your evidence or reveal the source of your alleged rumor so others can do a credibility check. |
Anonymous
You must not know mclean. The td is a royal jerk and he has power tripped these 08s before and playing up is not something supported by the club at all. It would be a good option what you say, yes, but no u12 green 08 is going to be invited to play up in ECNL next year. Not one. WS is a good option, but if there is no WS u13 teams in 2020-21, then a player always can back and try ECNL then if good enough. And yes, I have heard they like to blacklist but the ECNL coaches are in a different zone. |
Anonymous
| They may have intended to make DA the top tier but it did not turn out that way. Their best club along with many other very good ones left after one year. Now they need to shift resources to cover more teams. It’s not a bad thing for anyone. Funny that the DA teams are so defensive. |
Anonymous
Why not? There are 07s on ECNL U14 for McLean this year |
Anonymous
This is funny. It has been one year. They are playing for the long term. It’s not defensive, it’s just reality. Guess we’ll wait and see what happens. The rumor is apparently a wish, because you can’t substantiate it. No “resources” are shifting, unless they are shifting in someone’s head. |
Anonymous
They should play for the long term. Thinking that all of the good players will be in either league is not reality, that’s fantasy. Do you really think that no NT quality players will be playing at LAFC Slammers, PDA, Hawks, etc? Ignoring those clubs would be bad for US soccer. I guess that does not match your agenda. Your interests must not align with US Soccer. |
Anonymous
What agenda? What on earth are you talking about? You post unsubstantiated rumors that have no credible source and others are the one with an agenda? Crazy town. |
Anonymous
I did not post the rumor. I just said it makes sense. |
Anonymous
Based on what?? They aren't really scouting the u13 group anyway. There are no resources to be "saved" for ECNL scouting. The u13 group was introduced to provide a competing pathway to ECNL and expanded this year. The evidence is contrary to the notion you say makes sense. Makes a lot more sense that the older, established ECNL stars age out and the younger kids go disproportionately DA. It will take longer, because ECNL won't go down without a fight (which is why a few clubs moved back, as you allude to), but the writing is on the wall. |
Anonymous
You might be right on the resource front. I assumed part of shutting down the U12 boys is to save resources. Maybe there is no cost to US Soccer running U12 and U13. That would be surprising but I will take your word for it. For the younger ages in this area the best players have not flocked to DA clubs. Since you want evidence I point to the low attendance at DA ID sessions at WS and FCV. Right now the best 07 teams are ECNL clubs. Like you said it may take time. I would not say the writing is on the wall though. |
Anonymous
The only resources that would be saved are the scheduling and logistical arrangements for the games. Since there are only two U13 conference pilots underway now, there is not really a lot there. As far as younger kids in this area.....not many of those will be of national team caliber. There are really few of those nationwide and they are mostly in other regions, CA, PA/NJ/NY, TX, FL. How numbers sort here is not really that big a concern for US Soccer. And the few that are of that caliber will be heavily recruited to USDA teams, and everyone knows who those players are. It's not some secret and there aren't tons and tons of them. I know folks in this area are high on the 07's, but I guarantee you no more than a handful will be NT prospects in the end, an no amount of US Soccer scouting of ECNL in the DC area will change that. |