Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously? You just can't admit that women decide for themselves who to vote for? The most sexist attitude of all comes from you liberals who insist white women must have been persuaded, coerced, or bullied into voting for Trump - against their wishes, of course.

If anyone is setting back women, it's the left with their infantilizing of educated white women (and women in general).

It's appalling that you're actually blaming white women for HRC's loss, rather than taking a good, hard, dispassionate look at HRC herself and asking yourselves: why did my candidate lose? And then coming up with the correct answer, all on your own. She lost because she was an unappealing candidate. Own it and move on.

She was unappealing because of sexism. People are less likely to like strong women.

Psst: She was unappealing because Clinton is NOT a strong woman. She can't do anything on her own. She is the very sort of woman who would obey her husband's command to vote a certain way.

I'm a former R, and did not ever support the Clintons. I voted for both Bushes, but one thing I would never say about HRC is that she is a weak woman. No, she is a very strong woman, and though I may not agree with her, that is one thing I have often admired about her.. how tenacious she is. Even Trump admitted to that.

-signed a woman

Well, she fiercely defended her rapist husband so there's that.
She's strong - not ethics - but "strong" I suppose

If a woman accused your DH of rape, I'm going to assume that you love him so you would fiercely defend him. That doesn't make her "weak".

Yes it does. And a fool as well. Thank god she lost.

So you would never defend your DH from rape accusations? Does he know this? Wow.

But wait! Liberals say any man accused of rape is ALWAYS guilty! Don't you agree that if your husband was accused of rape, he would surely be guilty? So why would you defend your guilty, rapist husband?? Wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It would have been good to see the Clinton-Trump vote broken down by SAHM vs not. I bet I know which way that would go.

Duhhhhhhhhh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing makes a white woman more conservative than having a white son.

I never thought of it like that but I believe you have the single best insight regarding this whole topic

So if I'm a white woman with a white daughter I would have voted for HRC? What happens if I have a white son and a white daughter? Three white daughters and one white son?

If your daughter is naturally feminine and hot - you would’ve voted trump.

If she’s not stereotypically hot, hrc

This thread is getting funnier and funnier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a white woman but I totally understand why white women would vote to maintain their current position in the social hierarchy. They get all the benefits while white men work to give it to them. Empowerment of white women would increase the expectation that white women work. By protecting their husbands jobs they are protecting themselves. Screw all the other women.

White women are an oppressed minority.

Or the most privileged and coddled group to ever exist

Yes. Because sexism and violence against women no longer exist.

(I'm not a Hillary fan, but don't be absurd.)

Not being absurd. Just calling it like it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Is this about the illegal immigrants? Many women I know thought HRC fell apart during the Lewinsky thing and spent an inordinate amount of time in her social prayer groups. A JD degree and she stays with a jerk getting BJ's down the hall?

Please ....... theirs was a marriage of convenience. Nothing more or less. I am sure at some point, they really cared for each other but down the line it became a political marriage. She knew all along that Bill was getting his jollies elsewhere and was probably fine with it as long as he did not publicly embarrass her which was what happened with Lewinsky which was why she was so furious and hurt.

She may talk a good game about being a feminist but she has always known that her path to a political future was as Bill's long suffering wife and she played that role in spades. She is the ultimate example of a woman who made it politically on her husband's coat tails.

As do many women who married Georgetown grads?

Well, that was random...? How about female Georgetown grads. Are they allowed to vote for Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a white woman but I totally understand why white women would vote to maintain their current position in the social hierarchy. They get all the benefits while white men work to give it to them. Empowerment of white women would increase the expectation that white women work. By protecting their husbands jobs they are protecting themselves. Screw all the other women.

Exactly! And Hillary as a white woman and the wife of Bill Clinton capitalized on his position to get to where she is ....... which is fine. But to then pontificate about feminism and how white women are beholden to their white husbands is asinine and the height of hypocrisy.

THIS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't possibly find the time to read this entire thread today so I have one thing to say, STFU Hillary, you know nothing about the average woman and that is why you lost. I am the breadwinner in my family and my husband is a die hard Democrat (poor thing). Occasionally I have been able to entice him to the other side, ie. the Hogan election in Maryland. I am beyond proud that he saw past you and your fat ass in pantsuits to vote for Trump. He understood what Obama would do to this country and understood what you would continue. In fact, I think I can comfortably say he will never vote Democrat/Left/Progressive, whatever name you come up with for the next election, again in his lifetime. Hillary's lies and power hungry ways was enough to lose his vote. Hillary is a fool and those that continue to fan her flames deserve what they got, nothing.

Bravo!

Preach, sister.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't possibly find the time to read this entire thread today so I have one thing to say, STFU Hillary, you know nothing about the average woman and that is why you lost. I am the breadwinner in my family and my husband is a die hard Democrat (poor thing). Occasionally I have been able to entice him to the other side, ie. the Hogan election in Maryland. I am beyond proud that he saw past you and your fat ass in pantsuits to vote for Trump. He understood what Obama would do to this country and understood what you would continue. In fact, I think I can comfortably say he will never vote Democrat/Left/Progressive, whatever name you come up with for the next election, again in his lifetime. Hillary's lies and power hungry ways was enough to lose his vote. Hillary is a fool and those that continue to fan her flames deserve what they got, nothing.

Bravo!

Misogynist

And here we have the epitome of a left wing nutcase. If PP had been describing a man, what insult would you have trotted out? Moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a liberal and have reached a point where I can't stand Hillary.

I really wish she would go away; she is just a negative influence on the Democratic party. Her time has come and gone.

And it's time to stop pandering to illegal immigrants. I've been a member of the Democratic Party my entire life and much of all the rhetoric is BS.
Casa Perez and Keith 'their own states' Ellison? Trump is a loudmouth but at least he talks. The NFL? Why didn't Obama complain when knees were taken for a 2016 9 11 game?

The answer to everything from HRC is racist or Russian. That is just silly and designed to ramp up crowds. Of course Trump does the same but she is a total extreme liar. BC https://twitter.com/BillClinton?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

10,000 + FEMA and military in PR plus ships there or enroute and Clinton complains? http://nypost.com/2017/09/26/trump-sends-comfort-ship-to-puerto-rico-days-after-hillarys-plea/ The cruise ships ? Coulld they dock?

I call BS that you're a Democrat.

DP. Then you'll have to call BS on a lot of us (which I'm sure you'll be happy to do). I was always a Democrat - through college, marriage, and kids. Up until the last years of the Obama administration, in fact. Never, ever again. The Dem. Party is now the party of victimhood, PC run amok, and pandering to illegal aliens. Nope, nope, nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It would have been good to see the Clinton-Trump vote broken down by SAHM vs not. I bet I know which way that would go.

You do realize women (and men) aren't locked into being either a SAHM/WOHM for life, right? Most women do a combination of SAH and WOH over the years, and as their families' needs change. You have no idea how the vote would have been split.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a white woman but I totally understand why white women would vote to maintain their current position in the social hierarchy. They get all the benefits while white men work to give it to them. Empowerment of white women would increase the expectation that white women work. By protecting their husbands jobs they are protecting themselves. Screw all the other women.

White women are an oppressed minority.

Or the most privileged and coddled group to ever exist

Yes. Because sexism and violence against women no longer exist.

(I'm not a Hillary fan, but don't be absurd.)

Not being absurd. Just calling it like it is.

Nope. If you choose to associate with coddled white women, that's on you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a liberal and have reached a point where I can't stand Hillary.

I really wish she would go away; she is just a negative influence on the Democratic party. Her time has come and gone.

And it's time to stop pandering to illegal immigrants. I've been a member of the Democratic Party my entire life and much of all the rhetoric is BS.
Casa Perez and Keith 'their own states' Ellison? Trump is a loudmouth but at least he talks. The NFL? Why didn't Obama complain when knees were taken for a 2016 9 11 game?

The answer to everything from HRC is racist or Russian. That is just silly and designed to ramp up crowds. Of course Trump does the same but she is a total extreme liar. BC https://twitter.com/BillClinton?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

10,000 + FEMA and military in PR plus ships there or enroute and Clinton complains? http://nypost.com/2017/09/26/trump-sends-comfort-ship-to-puerto-rico-days-after-hillarys-plea/ The cruise ships ? Coulld they dock?

I call BS that you're a Democrat.

DP. Then you'll have to call BS on a lot of us (which I'm sure you'll be happy to do). I was always a Democrat - through college, marriage, and kids. Up until the last years of the Obama administration, in fact. Never, ever again. The Dem. Party is now the party of victimhood, PC run amok, and pandering to illegal aliens. Nope, nope, nope.

I'm with you on this. I'm someone who believes strongly in personal responsibility, and it just got to be too much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a white woman but I totally understand why white women would vote to maintain their current position in the social hierarchy. They get all the benefits while white men work to give it to them. Empowerment of white women would increase the expectation that white women work. By protecting their husbands jobs they are protecting themselves. Screw all the other women.

White women are an oppressed minority.

Or the most privileged and coddled group to ever exist

Yes. Because sexism and violence against women no longer exist.

(I'm not a Hillary fan, but don't be absurd.)

Not being absurd. Just calling it like it is.

I will have to find it, but there was a composite picture of Trump voters and Hillary voters. If true, it would make you think phrenology was real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a liberal and have reached a point where I can't stand Hillary.

I really wish she would go away; she is just a negative influence on the Democratic party. Her time has come and gone.

And it's time to stop pandering to illegal immigrants. I've been a member of the Democratic Party my entire life and much of all the rhetoric is BS.
Casa Perez and Keith 'their own states' Ellison? Trump is a loudmouth but at least he talks. The NFL? Why didn't Obama complain when knees were taken for a 2016 9 11 game?

The answer to everything from HRC is racist or Russian. That is just silly and designed to ramp up crowds. Of course Trump does the same but she is a total extreme liar. BC https://twitter.com/BillClinton?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

10,000 + FEMA and military in PR plus ships there or enroute and Clinton complains? http://nypost.com/2017/09/26/trump-sends-comfort-ship-to-puerto-rico-days-after-hillarys-plea/ The cruise ships ? Coulld they dock?

I call BS that you're a Democrat.

DP. Then you'll have to call BS on a lot of us (which I'm sure you'll be happy to do). I was always a Democrat - through college, marriage, and kids. Up until the last years of the Obama administration, in fact. Never, ever again. The Dem. Party is now the party of victimhood, PC run amok, and pandering to illegal aliens. Nope, nope, nope.

I'm with you on this. I'm someone who believes strongly in personal responsibility, and it just got to be too much.

The D's used to have a pretty strong and effective economic message too. Believe it or not, its what Trump campaigned on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a white woman but I totally understand why white women would vote to maintain their current position in the social hierarchy. They get all the benefits while white men work to give it to them. Empowerment of white women would increase the expectation that white women work. By protecting their husbands jobs they are protecting themselves. Screw all the other women.

Exactly! And Hillary as a white woman and the wife of Bill Clinton capitalized on his position to get to where she is ....... which is fine. But to then pontificate about feminism and how white women are beholden to their white husbands is asinine and the height of hypocrisy.

Well Hillary supported the trend until it came back and bit her in the ass. She supported her white male hubby over other white women and white women did the same thing to her. All together she will be fine. She's wealthy, white, well-protected.

There needs to be a feminism movement just for American WOC. Womanism is good but has become to niche so it alienates other women of color. Women of color need their own brand of feminism, white feminism does not serve us. All it got us was Donald Trump

I have good news for you: You can create your own minorities-only feminism! No one is stopping you.

Obviously, since you're purposefully excluding me, I'm not going to help you in any way, but I wish you the best of luck.

You seem upset, like someone hurt your feelings. Don't take things so personally.