Hannah Graham - what's the latest?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe those of you who are running after the property owner with pitch forks when you have NO idea if the property was searched, or not searched, and the reasons why. Crazy.

+1 The murderer is the one to blame here.

[Anonymous]

The body was found in a streambed. It could have been buried and not visible to earlier searchers, then uncovered in recent rains.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why couldn't this woman have searched her property, as the authorities had asked and emphasized; likely knowing that there are several "abandoned" properties or reason to believe property owners should be helping?

Are citizens of the Charlottesville area really so dense, as to not see the importance, or care enough, to help others?

Is this some sort of backwood, hillbilly, feigning ignorance (rather poorly) mentality?

I don't mean to compare, but at least in the Boston Marathon case, we saw the public do what they were told, and help out; which is what led to the capture of the criminals.

This property owner is only 74 years old. Certainly she was capable of either searching her property, or helping out in some way - any way.

What the hell is wrong with people? How would she feel if it were her daughter? Would she even notice she was gone? Wow.

I lived in Charlottesville before moving to the DC area. It is not as densely populated as Boston and the surrounding area (even just a few miles away from downtown) is hilly, heavily wooded and there's plenty of land that no one lives on.

My understanding is that thousands of volunteers have helped with this search. I found Charlottesville to be a warm, friendly community and I know many friends who feel devastated by this news without knowing Hannah Graham personally. This is an absolutely awful situation and I don't think accusing people of being ignorant hillbillies is helpful to anyone.

+1 Well stated! Plus, I can't imagine most women aged 74 being able to search that type of landscape thoroughly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Searcher who found Hannah Graham's remains says God wanted them to find what they found:

http://wtvr.com/2014/10/18/searcher-who-found-hannah-graham-remains-says-god-wanted-them-to-find-what-they-found/

Can they charge the property owners for something?

How can someone that owns property in that area close to his elementary school and high school and close the abduction site, NOT search their property. 5 weeks of this. Constantly on news channels. Thousands of people helping the search.

And some idiot owns so much property that they can't be bothered to search it.

Something does not seem right to me, that it can be that close, and that decomposed, that no one smelled it or did anything about it.

I'm actually surprised that the people who lived in that community and knew JM didn't take it upon themselves to search the area better. It's almost like that abandoned property was a little too obvious or something..

[Anonymous]

Did you read the blog post? A neighbor did report a tip about this property to the police back on Oct 5th.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did you read the blog post? A neighbor did report a tip about this property to the police back on Oct 5th.

I guess I'm just surprised that no one in that area took it upon themselves to check that property themselves. I can't imagine being in that situation and not going over to investigate.

I suppose the important thing is that she has now been found.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe those of you who are running after the property owner with pitch forks when you have NO idea if the property was searched, or not searched, and the reasons why. Crazy.

This is the DCUM way:

Learn of situation that will likely NEVER happen to you (e.g. Body buries in your property's backyard, being captures and beheaded by Isis), castigate those involved, detail all the ways the DCUM would have done everything right and been the superhero of the situation!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe those of you who are running after the property owner with pitch forks when you have NO idea if the property was searched, or not searched, and the reasons why. Crazy.

This is the DCUM way:

Learn of situation that will likely NEVER happen to you (e.g. Body buries in your property's backyard, being captures and beheaded by Isis), castigate those involved, detail all the ways the DCUM would have done everything right and been the superhero of the situation!

+1. All written in the most harsh and smug language imaginable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why couldn't this woman have searched her property, as the authorities had asked and emphasized; likely knowing that there are several "abandoned" properties or reason to believe property owners should be helping?

Are citizens of the Charlottesville area really so dense, as to not see the importance, or care enough, to help others?

Is this some sort of backwood, hillbilly, feigning ignorance (rather poorly) mentality?

I don't mean to compare, but at least in the Boston Marathon case, we saw the public do what they were told, and help out; which is what led to the capture of the criminals.

This property owner is only 74 years old. Certainly she was capable of either searching her property, or helping out in some way - any way.

What the hell is wrong with people? How would she feel if it were her daughter? Would she even notice she was gone? Wow.

I lived in Charlottesville before moving to the DC area. It is not as densely populated as Boston and the surrounding area (even just a few miles away from downtown) is hilly, heavily wooded and there's plenty of land that no one lives on.

My understanding is that thousands of volunteers have helped with this search. I found Charlottesville to be a warm, friendly community and I know many friends who feel devastated by this news without knowing Hannah Graham personally. This is an absolutely awful situation and I don't think accusing people of being ignorant hillbillies is helpful to anyone.

+1 Well stated! Plus, I can't imagine most women aged 74 being able to search that type of landscape thoroughly.

+2 I looked at that property on Zillow. Dense forest cover. Charlottesville is in the mountains and likely that streambed is rough and down a ravine. If it weren't for the buzzards (awful!) no one would have searched there... Even the neighbor was not willing to walk down there alone. We have a stream bed in our yard ... you can't even walk in it... so easy to break an ankle...and we do not live in the mountains.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe those of you who are running after the property owner with pitch forks when you have NO idea if the property was searched, or not searched, and the reasons why. Crazy.

This is the DCUM way:

Learn of situation that will likely NEVER happen to you (e.g. Body buries in your property's backyard, being captures and beheaded by Isis), castigate those involved, detail all the ways the DCUM would have done everything right and been the superhero of the situation!

+1. All written in the most harsh and smug language imaginable.

+2 I was appalled by the posters who are criticizing the owner of this property and suggesting that it be taken by eminent domain. Really? I can only think that those posting are very young 20-somethings (or younger) with limited life experience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe those of you who are running after the property owner with pitch forks when you have NO idea if the property was searched, or not searched, and the reasons why. Crazy.

This is the DCUM way:

Learn of situation that will likely NEVER happen to you (e.g. Body buries in your property's backyard, being captures and beheaded by Isis), castigate those involved, detail all the ways the DCUM would have done everything right and been the superhero of the situation!

+1. All written in the most harsh and smug language imaginable.

+2 I was appalled by the posters who are criticizing the owner of this property and suggesting that it be taken by eminent domain. Really? I can only think that those posting are very young 20-somethings (or younger) with limited life experience.

Yeah I really laughed at the one who thought the property should be seized and turned into a memorial park for the girls. Yeah okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you read the blog post? A neighbor did report a tip about this property to the police back on Oct 5th.

I guess I'm just surprised that no one in that area took it upon themselves to check that property themselves. I can't imagine being in that situation and not going over to investigate.

I suppose the important thing is that she has now been found.

The neighbor did look a little bit, but felt uncomfortable so he called the police instead. Given the location (close to where JM grew up), I'd put this one on the police for not investigating earlier. Not the neighbors.

[Anonymous]

They had hundreds of tips. It probably took a while to go through them all. Clearly they should have checked this one out sooner, but at least they eventually got to it. Once they had JM, there was, unforntuately, no real rush.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They had hundreds of tips. It probably took a while to go through them all. Clearly they should have checked this one out sooner, but at least they eventually got to it. Once they had JM, there was, unforntuately, no real rush.

I am happy they found her remains (at least it sounds like it was her even though there has not been confirmation). Now, they don’t need to cut a deal with this monster. I hope he enjoys the heat where he is headed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you read the blog post? A neighbor did report a tip about this property to the police back on Oct 5th.

I guess I'm just surprised that no one in that area took it upon themselves to check that property themselves. I can't imagine being in that situation and not going over to investigate.

I suppose the important thing is that she has now been found.

The neighbor did look a little bit, but felt uncomfortable so he called the police instead. Given the location (close to where JM grew up), I'd put this one on the police for not investigating earlier. Not the neighbors.

there are 4 property owners near this location. Anyone of them could have walked the area. I just dont believe that you can have so much property that you cant walk it. These are not rich people here.

see - https://www.google.com/maps/@37.924082,-78.6157643,16z