Just because you went to Edison and attended UC Berkeley, that doesn't make you an expert on TJ or TJ college acceptances. It looks like you don't know much about TJ so don't pretend like you are an expert on TJ. |
If you are so fond of average schools why did you attend UC Berkeley? According to your logic, attending "lower" performing college would lead to a better chance of being accepted to a competitive graduate school. Is it a case of do as I say not as I do? |
Why would you think that a straight A student with a high SAT score from Edison would not get into the schools you listed? I would think a 4.3 GPA student from Edison would have a very good chance of gaining acceptance to most, if not all, of the schools you listed. |
You should stop splitting hairs. Any educated person would put Stanford, Cal Tech, MIT and similar with ivy league schools. |
Maybe you should just get your facts right next time. You seem very defensive and incapable of acknowledging when you misspeak. |
I'm a NP and not the PP who put up the admission stats. I am just giving credit where credit is due. TJ's college admissions are impressive. |
No one suggested otherwise. But neither should those praising a STEM school get their noses out of joint where it's pointed out correctly by other posters that they appear to be struggling with some basic math and statistics. |
If you add UC Berkeley, Cal Tech, Chicago, Duke, Georgetown, Johns Hopkins, MIT, Michigan, Northwestern, Stanford (Ivy League level schools) to the Ivy schools you get 279 plus 297 = 576. Around 115 per year. That is 25% of about 450. |
That is true and if the OP had said that, no one would have disagreed with him. |
Apparently you don't read too well. I said in one of my earlier posts that the exact opposite is true with law school admissions - if you go to a more prestigious undergraduate university, it makes a significant difference. The same is not true, in my opinion, with regard to undergraduate admissions. I think most undergraduate admissions committees desire to equalize the playing field with regard to those who come from more privileged backgrounds vs. those that come from more underprivileged backgrounds. I think law school admissions committees, on the the hand, figure that the equalizing of he playing field was done with undergraduate admissions. |
It may not make me an expert, but it certainly gives me some actual experience. What's your experience? Put your cars on the table. |
One, I didn't attend Edison or any HS in this area. Two, I don't think TJ is some sort of secret that only select insiders understand. It's not hard to understand TJ and what it is. Personally, I think it's a great school, and if my kid is motivated to go there and challenge themselves, I'll be all for it. But, I'm not going to do it because I think it will suddenly make their college admissions chances a lot better. Maybe it will, maybe it won't. It really probably depends on the particular student. |
Yes, you figured it out. I'm just bitter that I got rejected by TJ. Please. I didn't go to HS anywhere near TJ or the DC area. And, as I wrote in another post, I think TJ is a great HS, and one of my children is motivated to attend TJ and accepted, I'd be elated to send them there. |
+1. If the decision is ever made to shutter TJ, it will likely be because the unwashed majority got tired of hearing variations of "It's a TJ thing, you wouldn't understand" from the self-appointed "TJ experts." |
For a STEM school, why so few or non-existent applications/acceptances to our service academies? These schools are perfect for the very smart, highly driven, athletic kid with an interest in engineering or the hard sciences. They are probably the most challenging schools in America. Plus, the education is free, you have a guaranteed job after graduation and your alumni networks are amazing!
|