OP your teacher is probably requiring this because not every 3 year old is modest or perfectly potty trained and neither are the boys. Sanitary issue. |
What a long post- all I want to ask is why all of the posters (although I skipped pages 5-8) are so fanatical about putting skirts OVER the shorts. Is it so weird for active girls to just WEAR SHORTS? I really don't get this whole discussion. |
I was much happier having more of a barrier than those little panties on my little girl. No boy is sitting down right on his underpants. |
I knew it! (NP here.) Frankly, I'm not surprised that the teacher connected the underpants of a 3yo to sexuality and then painted her and instructed her to sashay in a parade. Wow. On a different note, I remember wearing skirts and dresses everywhere, because I loved them, and playing kickball and doing cartwheels. I didn't wear shorts and didn't care who saw my underpants. I'm not sure at what age that changed, but I'm glad no one shamed me about my underwear. They just ignored it. |
No, the boy is wearing shorts. Why is your little girl wearing dresses to the playground? |
NP. Because... she likes dresses, and I believe that if an outfit can be made appropriate (e.g. by the addition of shorts, or a jacket, or something like that) then allowing my child to choose her own clothes is a developmentally appropriate means of encouraging making decisions and fostering a sense of independence. Why do preschoolers and young elementary students wear any of the often crazy not matching outfits they wear? Because picking one's own clothes is normal at around that age, and understanding practical considerations or having fashion sense is not yet. I don't allow formal clothes on days where she'll be doing anything messy, or superhero costumes anywhere they'd be rude and distracting, or old gross stained clothes away from home, but within reason she picks what she will wear and I make it work. |
The same can be said for wearing dresses and not worrying about if your underwear is showing. |
Possibly true, depending on how you look at it. This is a very individual sort of issue and just because one way of approaching the question of appropriate dress for young kids works for my family that doesn't mean it's the right approach for another family. In our family, we consider underwear and parts of the body covered by underwear to be very private and not something we need to show or see in public. I think this stance makes the whole boundaries/appropriateness thing very black & white and clear to my young girls; obviously we will probably need to get more nuanced with these types of rules as they get older. |
Make your DD dress in shorts and capris if you do not want her to wear shorts under her dress.
I do not find this an odd request. It protects your daughter. |
OP, I only perused some of the pages of responses. Personally, my 6 yr old DD has always worn bike shorts under her skirts and dresses. At younger ages she would sit with her legs spread out and her underwear would show--so if she sits on the grass or dirt there is little barrier (and can you imagine getting wood chips from the playground in YOUR underwear. Just put her in bike shorts under her dresses/skirts and move on. OR, if you like, use the bike shorts and swing tops. It's really such a small issue that you have made into a HUGE thing. |
![]() Not so old fashioned grandma |
Grandma, you're still a bit old fashion if you'd resurrect a thread from 2012. |
Uhhh. I can still see Johnny’s underwear up his shorts. Shouldn’t blue also need to wear bike shorts under his shorts to cover his under wear |
+100 |
+1 |