My children only wear Janie and Jack

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the Target defenders: really? I get things at Target but never expect them to look decent after a few washes. Fine stuff for camp, though.

Yeah, really. what exactly looks undecent about them? Maybe you need a new washer. It it doesn't have holes or large stains, I think it looks pretty decent.

But I would never dress my kid in the outfit OP posted except maybe for pictures once a year. Those are not comfortable materials. I might say "oh, how cute!" but inwardly I wonder what she was thinking to make the poor kid wear that.

My kids like soft jersey and elastic, so shoot me. I'll be the one in athletic shorts and a comfy tank top. I practice what I preach.

OP here. Excuse me, those outfits are 100% cotton. I'm allergic to synthetic material so we all only wear cotton. And I cut the tags off of their clothes and mine. I don't like the tags either. We do have a few outfits from Carter's - their regular line and the cheaper ones they make for target and walmart. I'm sorry but I wash it all together and JJ comes out of the dryer like new, Carter's kind of but the T and W ones don't.

I thought you were big on reselling your kids' outgrown clothes, OP - no tags is usually a big no for consigning!

I actually think they won't let you do it with the tags cut out.

[Anonymous]

9:39 this thread isn't about grammar or language proficiency . Start your own discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here.

Last time we got someone talking about DD's outfit she had these on:





The lady talking about it had her grandson in an outfit saying "daddy's little monkey" [insert eye roll here]

I paid $11 for the top and$12 for the shorts. Do people really care that much about what other kids wear? Wow!

That is seriously ugly. Much like you for caring so much about the labels and image.

[Anonymous]

9:44 no longer interested. It only takes one to make it all uninteresting .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:9:15 you either go to Landon or will go to Landon. Good luck. You won't need luck for being financially successful but you may need luck for being a decent human being. Or staying out of jail.

I'm 9:15 - unfortunately, I'm too poor to send my boys to Landon (as illustrated by the fact I said I buy my kids' clothes at Target!). So, they'll be stuck going to public school and trying to eek out a successful life without their parents' money. I think being cheeky little monkeys may actually help them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:9:15 you either go to Landon or will go to Landon. Good luck. You won't need luck for being financially successful but you may need luck for being a decent human being. Or staying out of jail.

I'm 9:15 - unfortunately, I'm too poor to send my boys to Landon (as illustrated by the fact I said I buy my kids' clothes at Target!). So, they'll be stuck going to public school and trying to eek out a successful life without their parents' money. I think being cheeky little monkeys may actually help them!

Because everyone loves a cheeky little kid.

[Anonymous]

9:15 you are so clever. We are all going to love your kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here.

Last time we got someone talking about DD's outfit she had these on:





The lady talking about it had her grandson in an outfit saying "daddy's little monkey" [insert eye roll here]

I paid $11 for the top and$12 for the shorts. Do people really care that much about what other kids wear? Wow!

That is seriously ugly. Much like you for caring so much about the labels and image.

These outfits, like I said yesterday, are just toooooooooooooooo MATCHY-MATCHY!!!!!!!!!!!!! AGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They show no imaginatin or creativity at all!!!! They say, "I am bored to dip my toe into anything except the tried and true!!" "AGH!!" I say again, "AGH!!!"

runs off screaming into the sunset in frustration

[Anonymous]

My children only wear Burberry. On sale. So there

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here.

Last time we got someone talking about DD's outfit she had these on:





The lady talking about it had her grandson in an outfit saying "daddy's little monkey" [insert eye roll here]

I paid $11 for the top and$12 for the shorts. Do people really care that much about what other kids wear? Wow!

That is seriously ugly. Much like you for caring so much about the labels and image.

Not to mention, as of today, the shirt is on sale for $18.99 and the bottoms $15.99, so I'm not sure how you got them so cheap. $35 is too much for a summer play outfit for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here.

Last time we got someone talking about DD's outfit she had these on:





The lady talking about it had her grandson in an outfit saying "daddy's little monkey" [insert eye roll here]

I paid $11 for the top and$12 for the shorts. Do people really care that much about what other kids wear? Wow!

That is seriously ugly. Much like you for caring so much about the labels and image.

It's not ugly. The bottom is fine, the top is overdone.

[Anonymous]

JJ has different prices online vs in store and the prices in store depend on the location.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here.

Last time we got someone talking about DD's outfit she had these on:





The lady talking about it had her grandson in an outfit saying "daddy's little monkey" [insert eye roll here]

I paid $11 for the top and$12 for the shorts. Do people really care that much about what other kids wear? Wow!

That is seriously ugly. Much like you for caring so much about the labels and image.

It's not ugly. The bottom is fine, the top is overdone.

Overdone? A white top with a embroidered strawberry on the corner is overdone? I just hope you're not the mom with the kid in spiderman Tshirt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here.

Last time we got someone talking about DD's outfit she had these on:





The lady talking about it had her grandson in an outfit saying "daddy's little monkey" [insert eye roll here]

I paid $11 for the top and$12 for the shorts. Do people really care that much about what other kids wear? Wow!

That is seriously ugly. Much like you for caring so much about the labels and image.

It's not ugly. The bottom is fine, the top is overdone.

Overdone? A white top with a embroidered strawberry on the corner is overdone? I just hope you're not the mom with the kid in spiderman Tshirt.

It's overdone (embroidery + fruit + elaborate shape), but especially so in combination with the bottom. If you combined it with jeans or some other dressed-down bottom, it would be better. The bottom is better.

And, no I am not a mom with the kid in Spiderman T-shirt though you are making too much of that. My kid in all likelihood is dressed better than yours (and more expensive, btw - I would rather pay full price a well-made piece that goes with a lot of different thing than buy loads of crap on sale).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here.

Last time we got someone talking about DD's outfit she had these on:





The lady talking about it had her grandson in an outfit saying "daddy's little monkey" [insert eye roll here]

I paid $11 for the top and$12 for the shorts. Do people really care that much about what other kids wear? Wow!

My guess would be that anyone putting their grandchild in a "daddy's little monkey" shirt probably wouldn't notice what your kid was wearing, let alone have any clue as to the brand name or price.

Yep. That would be me. Still trying to figure it out after six pages. Cute outfit for your DD though. I always thought clothes at these stores are too preppy for me. Anyways, my DD started rejecting my clothin choices for her beginning at 2 years, so although her jeans fit from the prior winter, she would have noting to do with them.