ICE is coming—note: per two threads/word of mouth posted this week

[Anonymous]

I wasn't sure what to make of Spanberger, but she seems to be making a tough stance against ICE abuse in Virginia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????




Yeah, no. No guns for you.

They are hypocrites, NOW they defend the 2nd amendment? 🙄

Details matter. Carrying guns is not an absolute right without limits. It makes more sense to protect yourself from government overreach than it does to carry because you are a snowflake fearing harm from fellow community members as you go fill your prescriptions at cvs or go to Applebees.

So only armed at protests. Got it. What could possibly go wrong?

Nobody killed all the MAGA fools in Michigan during Covid.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/30/michigan-protests-coronavirus-lockdown-armed-capitol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????




Yeah, no. No guns for you.

They are hypocrites, NOW they defend the 2nd amendment? 🙄

Details matter. Carrying guns is not an absolute right without limits. It makes more sense to protect yourself from government overreach than it does to carry because you are a snowflake fearing harm from fellow community members as you go fill your prescriptions at cvs or go to Applebees.

So only armed at protests. Got it. What could possibly go wrong?

Nobody killed all the MAGA fools in Michigan during Covid.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/30/michigan-protests-coronavirus-lockdown-armed-capitol

Missed opportunity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have immediate family and many colleagues in the Twin Cities. The “just comply” folks do not have a freaking clue what they are talking about.

+1 or they are blaming the people getting hurt, basically that messaging is lockstep MAGA

If you got hurt or killed because you attempted to run over a ICE officer, or because you were assaulting them and resisting arrest while carrying a gun, then guess what ? You are NOT a victim. You’re a criminal. A criminal who escalated the level of violence until it was lethal.

The thing I wonder about people being arrested for failing to comply or resisting arrest is this: If you spray painful chemicals in someone’s eyes and hold them down, it seems like an automatic physical response to the pain would be to struggle and writhe, in response to the immediate pain, not as an attempt to disobey. Does that ever enter the conversation? I’d love to hear from physicians/scientists on this issue.

A middle schooler’s science project could prove their hypothesis:

If Method: When pepper spray (oleoresin capsicum) is sprayed directly into a person's eyes and face, the human body initiates an immediate, involuntary, and violent defense mechanism to protect itself from the capsaicin, which causes intense pain and inflammation.

Then Method Deliberate harm using a chemical irritant to trigger the body’s natural, involuntary response to pepper spray, provoking a victim to innately cover/protect eyes and face with their hands. Attempting to handcuff the victim is futile resulting in resisting arrest.

Conclusion:🖕🏼TRUMP AND HIS FLYING🧊MONKEYS🖕🏼

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have immediate family and many colleagues in the Twin Cities. The “just comply” folks do not have a freaking clue what they are talking about.

+1 or they are blaming the people getting hurt, basically that messaging is lockstep MAGA

If you got hurt or killed because you attempted to run over a ICE officer, or because you were assaulting them and resisting arrest while carrying a gun, then guess what ? You are NOT a victim. You’re a criminal. A criminal who escalated the level of violence until it was lethal.

The thing I wonder about people being arrested for failing to comply or resisting arrest is this: If you spray painful chemicals in someone’s eyes and hold them down, it seems like an automatic physical response to the pain would be to struggle and writhe, in response to the immediate pain, not as an attempt to disobey. Does that ever enter the conversation? I’d love to hear from physicians/scientists on this issue.

A middle schooler’s science project could prove their hypothesis:

If Method: When pepper spray (oleoresin capsicum) is sprayed directly into a person's eyes and face, the human body initiates an immediate, involuntary, and violent defense mechanism to protect itself from the capsaicin, which causes intense pain and inflammation.

Then Method Deliberate harm using a chemical irritant to trigger the body’s natural, involuntary response to pepper spray, provoking a victim to innately cover/protect eyes and face with their hands. Attempting to handcuff the victim is futile resulting in resisting arrest.

Conclusion:🖕🏼TRUMP AND HIS FLYING🧊MONKEYS🖕🏼

You can also do a simple thought experiment:

Don't resist or disobey law enforcement, so you don't get sprayed with a non-lethal chemical deterrent. You don't get sprayed, you don't get handcuffed, arrested, jailed, or prosecuted, and you remain free to note your objections to government policies at the ballot box like other civilized people.

Huh, what an idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have immediate family and many colleagues in the Twin Cities. The “just comply” folks do not have a freaking clue what they are talking about.

+1 or they are blaming the people getting hurt, basically that messaging is lockstep MAGA

If you got hurt or killed because you attempted to run over a ICE officer, or because you were assaulting them and resisting arrest while carrying a gun, then guess what ? You are NOT a victim. You’re a criminal. A criminal who escalated the level of violence until it was lethal.

The thing I wonder about people being arrested for failing to comply or resisting arrest is this: If you spray painful chemicals in someone’s eyes and hold them down, it seems like an automatic physical response to the pain would be to struggle and writhe, in response to the immediate pain, not as an attempt to disobey. Does that ever enter the conversation? I’d love to hear from physicians/scientists on this issue.

A middle schooler’s science project could prove their hypothesis:

If Method: When pepper spray (oleoresin capsicum) is sprayed directly into a person's eyes and face, the human body initiates an immediate, involuntary, and violent defense mechanism to protect itself from the capsaicin, which causes intense pain and inflammation.

Then Method Deliberate harm using a chemical irritant to trigger the body’s natural, involuntary response to pepper spray, provoking a victim to innately cover/protect eyes and face with their hands. Attempting to handcuff the victim is futile resulting in resisting arrest.

Conclusion:🖕🏼TRUMP AND HIS FLYING🧊MONKEYS🖕🏼

You can also do a simple thought experiment:

Don't resist or disobey law enforcement, so you don't get sprayed with a non-lethal chemical deterrent. You don't get sprayed, you don't get handcuffed, arrested, jailed, or prosecuted, and you remain free to note your objections to government policies at the ballot box like other civilized people.

Huh, what an idea.

She was asking for it with that short skirt, amirite?

You are assuming that the LEOs are acting in good faith and aren’t out there spraying or shooting people in the face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have immediate family and many colleagues in the Twin Cities. The “just comply” folks do not have a freaking clue what they are talking about.

+1 or they are blaming the people getting hurt, basically that messaging is lockstep MAGA

If you got hurt or killed because you attempted to run over a ICE officer, or because you were assaulting them and resisting arrest while carrying a gun, then guess what ? You are NOT a victim. You’re a criminal. A criminal who escalated the level of violence until it was lethal.

The thing I wonder about people being arrested for failing to comply or resisting arrest is this: If you spray painful chemicals in someone’s eyes and hold them down, it seems like an automatic physical response to the pain would be to struggle and writhe, in response to the immediate pain, not as an attempt to disobey. Does that ever enter the conversation? I’d love to hear from physicians/scientists on this issue.

A middle schooler’s science project could prove their hypothesis:

If Method: When pepper spray (oleoresin capsicum) is sprayed directly into a person's eyes and face, the human body initiates an immediate, involuntary, and violent defense mechanism to protect itself from the capsaicin, which causes intense pain and inflammation.

Then Method Deliberate harm using a chemical irritant to trigger the body’s natural, involuntary response to pepper spray, provoking a victim to innately cover/protect eyes and face with their hands. Attempting to handcuff the victim is futile resulting in resisting arrest.

Conclusion:🖕🏼TRUMP AND HIS FLYING🧊MONKEYS🖕🏼

You can also do a simple thought experiment:

Don't resist or disobey law enforcement, so you don't get sprayed with a non-lethal chemical deterrent. You don't get sprayed, you don't get handcuffed, arrested, jailed, or prosecuted, and you remain free to note your objections to government policies at the ballot box like other civilized people. Huh, what an idea.

Nice try, simpleton.

[Anonymous]

If you got hurt or killed because you attempted to run over a ICE officer, or because you were assaulting them and resisting arrest while carrying a gun, then guess what ? You are NOT a victim. You’re a criminal. A criminal who escalated the level of violence until it was lethal.

Enjoy your short time here because justice and retribution is near.

Renee and Alex DID NOT attempt to assault, nor “run over” ICE.

Pretti legally exercised his 2A right to carry. 10 shots fired at a legal citizen, ICU nurse who worked for the VA. His “fake crime” was helping a woman who was pushed to the ground by ICE.

3 shots to the face of that “fking b|tch.” Jonathan Ross is gonna be someone’s b|tch very soon.

2025-2026 The majority of individuals in ICE custody are NOT convicted of any crimes, resisting or engaging in violence during their arrest.

Non-Criminal Arrests: 2025-2026 approximately 65% to 75% of people in ICE detention had no criminal convictions.

Detention Numbers: In November 2025, about 65,000 people were in detention despite a large majority of them with no criminal record.

No Violent Convictions: About 93% of people taken by ICE had no violent convictions.

Wrongful Detention of Citizens: Investigations have indicated that over 170 U.S. citizens were wrongfully held by immigration agents in the first nine months of 2024, many of whom were not resisting, but rather were wrongfully detained.

False Claims: Department of Homeland Security claims a 1,153% increase in assaults against ICE officers from 2024 to 2025. Tens of thousands arrested do not have violent records.

[Anonymous]

I have not seen one ICE agent in our area yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have not seen one ICE agent in our area yet.

They were spotted at CAVA on Fenton in DTSS.

[Anonymous]

Start with 7 corners Baily cross roads, it looks like 3rd world

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Start with 7 corners Baily cross roads, it looks like 3rd world

Learn how to spell and use correct grammar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Start with 7 corners Baily cross roads, it looks like 3rd world

Too many MAGAs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have immediate family and many colleagues in the Twin Cities. The “just comply” folks do not have a freaking clue what they are talking about.

+1 or they are blaming the people getting hurt, basically that messaging is lockstep MAGA

If you got hurt or killed because you attempted to run over a ICE officer, or because you were assaulting them and resisting arrest while carrying a gun, then guess what ? You are NOT a victim. You’re a criminal. A criminal who escalated the level of violence until it was lethal.

The thing I wonder about people being arrested for failing to comply or resisting arrest is this: If you spray painful chemicals in someone’s eyes and hold them down, it seems like an automatic physical response to the pain would be to struggle and writhe, in response to the immediate pain, not as an attempt to disobey. Does that ever enter the conversation? I’d love to hear from physicians/scientists on this issue.

A middle schooler’s science project could prove their hypothesis:

If Method: When pepper spray (oleoresin capsicum) is sprayed directly into a person's eyes and face, the human body initiates an immediate, involuntary, and violent defense mechanism to protect itself from the capsaicin, which causes intense pain and inflammation.

Then Method Deliberate harm using a chemical irritant to trigger the body’s natural, involuntary response to pepper spray, provoking a victim to innately cover/protect eyes and face with their hands. Attempting to handcuff the victim is futile resulting in resisting arrest.

Conclusion:🖕🏼TRUMP AND HIS FLYING🧊MONKEYS🖕🏼

You can also do a simple thought experiment:

Don't resist or disobey law enforcement, so you don't get sprayed with a non-lethal chemical deterrent. You don't get sprayed, you don't get handcuffed, arrested, jailed, or prosecuted, and you remain free to note your objections to government policies at the ballot box like other civilized people. Huh, what an idea.

Nice try, simpleton.

Concept too complex for you? Action = reaction? It's not complicated, but does require a modicum of intellectual acuity to understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Start with 7 corners Baily cross roads, it looks like 3rd world

Too many MAGAs?

Lots of women in ninja outfits and modello people