Did Sean Duffy: don't wear pajamas when coming to airport or when flying

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.

There is no advantage to economy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.

There is no advantage to economy.

It beats getting stuck in traffic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.

There is no advantage to economy.

Sure there is. You’re not in it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.

There is no advantage to economy.

It beats getting stuck in traffic.

Not really.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.

There is no advantage to economy.

It beats getting stuck in traffic.

Not really.

You’re giving Thurston Howell vibes. Or maybe Lovey.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

I only fly business or first class and have never gotten a note from the crew. What do they say in the note?

“When the revolution comes, you will be among the first eaten.”

lol.

[Anonymous]

I haven't owned actual pajamas since I was in high school other than a pair my mom gave me for christmas one year. I wear a t shirt and cotton jersey shorts or a long sleeved t shirt and light weight sweat pants for sleeping depending on the time of year. Seems to me like elastic pants and a pull over shirt and some kind of slipper shoe is ideal. No metal for the detectors. No stiff seams or zipper tabs or buttons poking you when you're squished like the dough in a Pillsbury container.

Plus suits didn't seem to stop Trump from assaulting women in first class back when people were less casual than now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ok, not to get sidetracked here, but I’m more offended by the way Kimberley Guilfoyle dresses for a formal occasion as she represents our country abroad than I am by sloppy air passengers. I’ve seen people in pajamas at the supermarket, Target, Walmart, etc. so it’s not unusual.

RNC: NEVER FORGET https://share.google/images/oP2c8X1FQYKr5boSQ

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I haven't owned actual pajamas since I was in high school other than a pair my mom gave me for christmas one year. I wear a t shirt and cotton jersey shorts or a long sleeved t shirt and light weight sweat pants for sleeping depending on the time of year. Seems to me like elastic pants and a pull over shirt and some kind of slipper shoe is ideal. No metal for the detectors. No stiff seams or zipper tabs or buttons poking you when you're squished like the dough in a Pillsbury container.

Plus suits didn't seem to stop Trump from assaulting women in first class back when people were less casual than now.

This, especially the last sentence. Duffy never mentioned sexual assault, huh.

[Anonymous]

Find out what happens when people stop being polite and start wearing PJs at the airport.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.

There is no advantage to economy.

The advantage to flying economy is the giving the airlines as little of your money as possible. And that’s definitely worth it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To show what we think of this administration everyone should wear plaid pajama pants on flights.

Absolutely!

Just like with the pussyhats and Handmaid’s costumes, it makes you fools easier to spot at a distance.

[Anonymous]

Doesn't Duffy have a job he should be doing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To show what we think of this administration everyone should wear plaid pajama pants on flights.

Absolutely!

Just like with the pussyhats and Handmaid’s costumes, it makes you fools easier to spot at a distance.

Pussyhats keep you asshats at a distance, working as intended.

[Anonymous]

Re the Ambassador to Greece: Ever been to a beach in Greece? Her gown is outright stifling for that country. She has skin; LET IT BREATHE!