Spanberger 2028

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s thin, blonde, educated

Should be quite competitive at the top or bottom of the ticket

she is good, but only if she stops the overwhelming immigration.

we will see if she helps US workers or the elites.

You think it's the job of Virginia governor to stop immigration?

This is bankrupting the local govt so it is a major problem

DP. I think she is supposed to defend the Constitution as long as Virginia is a part of the United States. That includes obeying US laws.

It is not the responsibility of the state government to enforce civil immigration laws. The agency that has hundreds of billions of dollars in funding needs to be doing that.

Glad I could clear that up for you.

[redquasar]

Your grandparents weren't illegal. And green card is a privilege. Birthright citizenship TBD with this Supreme Court. Definitely some mistakes being made by ICE, but that is not the norm IMO.

[Anonymous]

redquasar wrote:Your grandparents weren't illegal. And green card is a privilege. Birthright citizenship TBD with this Supreme Court. Definitely some mistakes being made by ICE, but that is not the norm IMO.

“Mistakes” are getting innocent people killed. If the price for a civilian making a mistake is illegal detention, injury, or death, then it needs to go both ways. ICE needs to be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s thin, blonde, educated

Should be quite competitive at the top or bottom of the ticket

Not sure she’s ready for the top of the ticket but a Shapiro / Spanberger ticket would be music to my ears!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s thin, blonde, educated

Should be quite competitive at the top or bottom of the ticket

Run another far-left progressive woman. It's worked great so far!

It never ceases to amaze how MAGA chuds think anyone to the left of Pat Buchanan is a far-left progressive.

Clinton and Harris were also described as "not that liberal." Same profile. So call it whatever you want but they both got *demolished* by *this guy.* Think about that - their profile was so unappealing that *this guy* beat them. And the second time it wasn't even a race - it was called a week before the election inside both campaigns.

You don't have be in favor of him to see the pattern and perhaps think going for a three-peat is a bad idea.

Funny how you forget that "that guy" got "demolished" in between the two victories.

Oh, and it was a *race* in 2024. (Harris's race). Yes, sadly, racism and sexism are enough to move the needle in elections. A sundowning liberal white guy defeated a sundowning insane criminal white guy in 2020.

Maybe "liberal" isn't the issue that drives people to Trump after all.

Does pointing any of that make you feel better that he's the President of the United States?