Disney primarily for the wealthy? NYT Article
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
I remember going to a conference in Orlando and the number of international attendees who were going to extend their trip by a few days to go to Disney and Epcot solo as one adult was quite high. |
Anonymous
You're not traveling or accounting for a family of 5. I would need 2 hotel rooms in Europe. Disney can accommodate a family of 5 in one room. Accommodations alone are much more expensive in Europe for larger families. |
Anonymous
Post your budget. Unless you are comparing European pensiones to the Polynesian resort there is no way 10 days in Europe is cheaper than 4 days in Disneyworld. |
Anonymous
Space Mountain is a standard coaster that's just in the dark and they blow air at you. It's really not that special. The best coaster in Orlando isn't even at Disney. |
Anonymous
What, you don’t think the added thrill of wondering if you’re going to be decapitated by some of the bars above the tracks? (But in all seriousness I love Space Mountain) |
Anonymous
Velocicoaster or Hagrid’s? |
Anonymous
I think flights to Orlando are more expensive than what you projected, and I know the food is ridiculously overpriced and barely edible. Having said that, we have still done Disney a number of times for our kids and will probably do it one more time. It’s fun for them. FTR my kids also enjoy Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Caribbean—and we really haven’t gone to any other amusement parks aside from Hershey once or twice. Lots of things are ridiculously overpriced and expensive, but we still try to swing it so our kids have the experience. I mean, think about how much it costs to go to NYC to see a Broadway show and visit a museum once you add in the travel, hotel, food, tix, etc. It’s outrageous and most people can’t afford it. (And my kids like NYC but far prefer Disney.) |
Anonymous
Nope. I went in the 80s with my parents and again in the 00s with my kids, the experience was very different. In the 80s, the focus was on theming. There was so much imagination and detailed charm that it dazzled. In the 00s, the focus was more on thrills, with a sprinkling of theming on top. I was so excited that they had returned to the Figment theme for the Imagination Pavilion that I hyped it up and dragged my kids there. They had significantly shortened the ride and greatly reduced the details, with an overemphasis on black lights and glow in the dark paint. It felt more like a cheesy funhouse fair ride than a magical Disney experience. The ImageWorks was just an empty room that had been closed off. When we left the pavilion, I was depressed and my family was confused why I’d made them waste their time. Meanwhile they’d added roller coasters and other thrill based rides, but if that’s what I wanted I could get them from any local amusement park with cheaper admission tickets, shorter lines, and without having to travel and stay in a hotel. Also, when we went in the 80s, it was utterly pristine. Surely any place that had that many visitors daily must be magical for there to be not a stray piece of litter, not a speck of gum, not a trace of dust anywhere. Fastforward to the 2000s, and not only was there the expected detritus of a crowd, but the rides themselves showed a lack of care. There was dust on the animatronic figures costumes and a lot of the older rides just seemed run-down. Now, in addition to hiking up the basic admission prices, unless you are willing to pay extra for lightning passes, you are basically a second-class visitor, whose line waits are prolonged because you have to make way for the elites who won’t wait their turns. Basically, people are paying more for less. With Disney becoming more like a standard theme park than a magical world, it’s a lot less appealing to pay more, wait in longer lines, and be reminded that your wait is lengthened because you’re a second class visitor. The feeling is less that the park is there to give you joy than that you’re there to give it profit. |
Anonymous
|
Europe is great, but why are you all comparing a trip to Europe to a trip to a massive theme park resort as mutually exclusive? I'm pretty tapped out on Europe myself and grasping at straws to find new places to go, but that all said...
I do both. I also do more exotic places. I go to different places for different reasons. In September I'm going to Orlando for five days. Plane tickets were $200 each RT on United. The rental car is $250. The hotel is $115 a night including parking. That leaves park tickets and incremental cost of food and treats over what I'd spend at home. When I take the 8AM United flight out of Dulles, I'm through the gate at one of the parks, Disney or Universal, just after 11. It's just a very different thing than international because it's so short and easy. And very different because it's a resort experience. You can do both, people. It's OK to like multiple things. Implying you shouldn't do Disney because Europe may be cheaper in some scenarios is just a pointless point. |
Anonymous
I've done Stardust Racers several times and it's a real contender for best in Orlando. It's just non-stop fun and the dueling loop is just amazing. |
Anonymous
|
I remember going to Disney as a kid and having a great time. There was no real pre-planning. We just showed up and hopped from ride to ride. Even paper lightning lanes didn't really change our flow.
I've gone twice with my kids in modern times and didn't enjoy either. We're in the upper income bracket and paid for the perks and still didn't have fun. The first time the kids were little and we splurged for Polynesian to be on the monorail and close to MK. The parks had FP+. There ended up being a glitch in the tech system and we had tons and tons of trouble accessing the FP system, leading to us waiting in hour plus long lines several times a day to try to get it fixed. It was awful and we still had to zig zag the park with little kids to make ride times. We were so stressed and it wasn't fun at all. There was also a bunch of maintenance going on, presumably because we were there in the off season, so pre-booked FPs would be lost and we'd arrive at rides to find they were down, plus all the other lines were longer because big attractions weren't running. Plus I'd booked and paid a fortune for a couple of character meals, only to find out my toddler was terrified of the characters and would scream her head off if they even came into the room. We had to give up on those very, very expensive meals altogether. The whole experience was miserable. We went back a few years later after the Lightning Lanes opened. I did a ton of research this time and knew all the tricks. But we arrived on a day with a major lightning storm that took out most of the rides at MK for most of the week. That same storm had people camping out at their table at Cinderella's table so we waited 4 hours for our reservation with hungry kids in pouring rain because the people ahead of us weren't leaving. The whole place was in chaos. Then we'd booked another specialty meal at a restaurant and the kitchen caught on fire and we lost half a park day waiting to recover our belongings after being evacuated for a fire. We tried to get dinner in Epcot World showcase one night and all of the lines were so long from a festival that we eventually went back to our hotel room and ordered a pizza. There was just no reasonable way to get food with the insane lines. I could go on, but the entire trip was a series of disasters from a broken Disney bus that left us stranded for two hours on a park road to waiting an hour in line to have the ride go down when we were up next. Disney didn't make any of this right for us. The level of service was so so low for the cost. The parks were so so crowded. I'm slightly intrigued about the new Premiere Pass and not having to be on a schedule and being more able to work around ride closures, but I'm not sure I can be convinced. We just paid so much on the prior trips for shitty experiences and stress. The Disney adults can have Disney. We'll go elsewhere. |
Anonymous
You can get a two bedroom apartment in most European cities for less than a large hotel room on property at Disney. Also some European chains have rooms that will accommodate a family of 5. In Copenhagen (which really is an incredibly family-friendly city, I highly recommend it) the Scandic chain has large rooms that can accommodate a family of 5. Other than London and Paris, I've found accommodations in Europe to be vastly more affordable than in the US. Depending on timing you can also often benefit from a favorable exchange rate. |
Anonymous
Where in Europe? Certainly not any of the western capital cities. Nope. Not a chance. |
Anonymous
You don't need a large hotel room at Disney. You can get a basic room and it has 2 queens and a sofa pullout. No basic room in London will put 5 in a room. |
Anonymous
STFU. It's earned every day by working people. Go cry somewhere else. |