Is this clip really demonstrative of how Trump voters feel about the trans community?

[Anonymous]

Let’s be absolutely clear. The anti-trans movement exists only because you cannot openly be anti-gay. And, the only purpose of the anti-trans movement is to kill people who are trans. Yes, they want to kill all gay people, but - killing some trans kids is a start.

Every anti-trans person you know is Evil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be absolutely clear. The anti-trans movement exists only because you cannot openly be anti-gay. And, the only purpose of the anti-trans movement is to kill people who are trans. Yes, they want to kill all gay people, but - killing some trans kids is a start.

Every anti-trans person you know is Evil.

Every pro-trans person you know is deeply, irrevocably, and entirely misogynist to their core. They want to kill all women. And they are Evil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be absolutely clear. The anti-trans movement exists only because you cannot openly be anti-gay. And, the only purpose of the anti-trans movement is to kill people who are trans. Yes, they want to kill all gay people, but - killing some trans kids is a start.

Every anti-trans person you know is Evil.

Every pro-trans person you know is deeply, irrevocably, and entirely misogynist to their core. They want to kill all women. And they are Evil.

(Just pointing out how ridiculous the original PP is.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be absolutely clear. The anti-trans movement exists only because you cannot openly be anti-gay. And, the only purpose of the anti-trans movement is to kill people who are trans. Yes, they want to kill all gay people, but - killing some trans kids is a start.

Every anti-trans person you know is Evil.

Every pro-trans person you know is deeply, irrevocably, and entirely misogynist to their core. They want to kill all women. And they are Evil.

Casual observer here, but really, there’s not enough therapy in the world to fix all this. You need to find a different way. Maybe don’t F* with Mother Nature.

[Anonymous]

The people on here comparing the word 'cis' to the word Mace used are insane. The equivalent to cis is the word trans. No one has ever demeaned you specifically for being cis, and I doubt any of you are ever called cisgender unless it's relevant. I am trans, if I decide the word 'trans' is a slur and you have to call me normal, does that make any sense?

(Also, the idea that "pregnant people" is offensive is hilarious. Women are people. If I say there's a lot of people in the women's bathroom, am I erasing women? Using the term people to describe a group of women is not at all offensive.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The people on here comparing the word 'cis' to the word Mace used are insane. The equivalent to cis is the word trans. No one has ever demeaned you specifically for being cis, and I doubt any of you are ever called cisgender unless it's relevant. I am trans, if I decide the word 'trans' is a slur and you have to call me normal, does that make any sense?

(Also, the idea that "pregnant people" is offensive is hilarious. Women are people. If I say there's a lot of people in the women's bathroom, am I erasing women? Using the term people to describe a group of women is not at all offensive.)

God, the entitlement is off the charts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be absolutely clear. The anti-trans movement exists only because you cannot openly be anti-gay. And, the only purpose of the anti-trans movement is to kill people who are trans. Yes, they want to kill all gay people, but - killing some trans kids is a start.

Every anti-trans person you know is Evil.

Every pro-trans person you know is deeply, irrevocably, and entirely misogynist to their core. They want to kill all women. And they are Evil.

(Just pointing out how ridiculous the original PP is.)

Not at all ridiculous. Satan is very happy with the efforts of the Anti-gay/anti-trans minions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me put a different question to those here who think what Mace did was shocking and offensive.

Why do you insist on using the term “cisgender” or “cis” to describe heterosexual people?

It’s been made abundantly clear over the last several years that there is a large percentage of the heterosexual community, female and male alike, that consider the term offensive and a slur. Yet it’s still used as a defacto default term for heterosexual people. Why is this happening? You KNOW it’s an offensive term, but you use it anyway.


How is this ok?

cisgender is not the same as heterosexual. Gay people can be cisgender (and most are).

So then what is it? Why do we need a special term for “normal” ?

You you’re offended by words you don’t understand? That explains a lot.

Not offended but it’s dumb to have a specific word for a man, that looks a man. We used to just be able to say “man”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be absolutely clear. The anti-trans movement exists only because you cannot openly be anti-gay. And, the only purpose of the anti-trans movement is to kill people who are trans. Yes, they want to kill all gay people, but - killing some trans kids is a start.

Every anti-trans person you know is Evil.

Every pro-trans person you know is deeply, irrevocably, and entirely misogynist to their core. They want to kill all women. And they are Evil.

(Just pointing out how ridiculous the original PP is.)

Not at all ridiculous. Satan is very happy with the efforts of the Anti-gay/anti-trans minions.

Oh. You are insane. That goes hand-in-hand with the violent misogynistic cult membership, I suppose.

[Anonymous]

Fact: If the Dems weren’t bending the knee to trans activists Trump wouldn’t be president. We wouldn’t have a psycho in office if the Dems had some backbone and didn’t jump through hoops because they were afraid of being called bigots by some fringe group who’s ideology is being rejected in social Democratic countries like Sweden now. When you are to the left of Sweden on social issues you are not going to win elections. Period.

[Anonymous]

Duuuuude

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As an independent, I think this is a great example why Democrats lost our support.

This guy just up there speaking down to a woman, like she was an idiot, because she wasn’t 100% in the know about a niche slur that impacts some percentage of a percentage of Americans. Shows how out of touch these Dems are.

As someone who has loved ones who are trans, I ask why instead of chiding her like a child, could he not have gone to her after the meeting, in private, to politely inform her that most transgender people prefer not to be called by that term? I’m sure she would apologize and rethink using the term in the future. But of course he needed to grandstand and get his clip for ‘TikTok’ while attacking this poor woman publicly all just to embarrass her.

You must be kidding. Nobody can be this dumb.

I think they really are. It’s not a niche slur, she absolutely intended it as a slur, she made the slur from a position of power and in public, so any correction will be intentional and in public too. She does not get the benefit of some private meeting when her hatred is out in public. She’s so full of hate anyway she’s proud of this and not the least bit offended.

[Anonymous]

There’s really no silver lining here for trans people. Project 2025 wants to criminalize their existence. People voted for this. They don’t care about how many people they hurt. It’s all about validating their feelings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s really no silver lining here for trans people. Project 2025 wants to criminalize their existence. People voted for this. They don’t care about how many people they hurt. It’s all about validating their feelings.

Trans don’t care about the women they hurt by unfairly competing in women’s sports. Trans have hijacked women’s spaces for their own purposes. It’s all about validating the trans movement and their feelings.

[Anonymous]

I work with a colleague who is an “evolutionary psychologist,” and his methodologies are deeply problematic and rooted in early eugenics. These theories fuel white supremacy by creating the idea that some human “genes” should be eliminated, such as the genes that exhibit in being trans, gay, or a single woman without kids. These theories have been creeping back into academia to legitimize white supremacist ideologies.