Trump. “It doesn't cost 60,000 bucks to bury a f###ing Mexican!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just because Trump was respectful towards the victims family, doesn't mean he can't turn around and gripe to someone else aboit the burial costs.

That is true. But that doesn't mean he paid for it.

The big accusation is the claim that he refused to pay for it. We know from Meadows' tweets that he did not pay for it.

To me, the bigger accusation is the "f###ing Mexican" comment. Whether or not he ended up paying for it doesn't matter, it's not like he's required to.

[Anonymous]

No Mexican’s funeral is going to cost $60 unless it’s a cartel chieftain. President Trump was dead on. These people saw the gravy train once he agreed to pay for the funeral, but that would have been maybe $5 or 6k. Not ten times that much.

Dems were stupid to push this story. It shows President Trump is a hell of a negotiator which we need to end the Ukraine, Iran and Taiwan disasters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How believable it took 4 1/2 years for this story to come two weeks before the election when Trump is leading?

Gee what a coincidence

You must be new to politics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No Mexican’s funeral is going to cost $60 unless it’s a cartel chieftain. President Trump was dead on. These people saw the gravy train once he agreed to pay for the funeral, but that would have been maybe $5 or 6k. Not ten times that much.

Dems were stupid to push this story. It shows President Trump is a hell of a negotiator which we need to end the Ukraine, Iran and Taiwan disasters.

But, he could have given that amount >> $5K - $6k. He did tell them he'd pay for the funeral, so why renege on it?

Also, he didn't negotiate anything. He threw a tantrum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From your link:

Regarding Trump’s “f-word Mexican” comment, Pfeiffer wrote: “President Donald Trump never said that. This is an outrageous lie from The Atlantic two weeks before the election.” He provided statements from Patel and a spokesman for Meadows, who denied having heard Trump make the statement. Via Pfeiffer, Meadows’s spokesman also denied that Trump had ordered Meadows not to pay for the funeral.

The statement from Patel that Pfeiffer sent me said: “As someone who was present in the room with President Trump, he strongly urged that Spc. Vanessa Guillen’s grieving family should not have to bear the cost of any funeral arrangements, even offering to personally pay himself in order to honor her life and sacrifice. In addition, President Trump was able to have the Department of Defense designate her death as occurring ‘in the line of duty,’ which gave her full military honors and provided her family access to benefits, services, and complete financial assistance.”

+1
I was just about to post the above. This OP is flat-out lying. How dishonest to not even include the rest of the article. And how typical. Here is some more from the same article:

Shortly after I emailed a series of questions to a Trump spokesperson, Alex Pfeiffer, I received an email from Khawam, who asked me to publish a statement from Mayra Guillén, Vanessa’s sister. Pfeiffer then emailed me the same statement. “I am beyond grateful for all the support President Donald Trump showed our family during a trying time,” the statement reads. “I witnessed firsthand how President Trump honors our nation’s heroes’ service. We are grateful for everything he has done and continues to do to support our troops.”

OP linked the entire article.

OP was counting on no one actually reading it and discovering that the parts she chose to quote were FAKE. Honestly - you people mock any report that relies on anonymous sources, as long as it's a critique of a Democrat. But suddenly, those anonymous sources are so very credible if the target is Trump (or any Republican). Your utter hypocrisy would be amusing if it wasn't so completely pathetic.

Someone’s spokesperson denying something doesn’t make it FAKE. Are you 12?

Anonymous sources claiming one thing or another doesn't make it REAL. JFC.

Are you this angry when your orange idol says "Many people are saying" and then spews some ridiculous lie? Please be honest now!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How believable it took 4 1/2 years for this story to come two weeks before the election when Trump is leading?

Gee what a coincidence

You must be new to politics.

Great American patriot heroes anonymously tell a tale of great horror and high import four years after the event but 14 days before an election. I’m sure it’s all true! Really huge deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How believable it took 4 1/2 years for this story to come two weeks before the election when Trump is leading?

Gee what a coincidence

Very believable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How believable it took 4 1/2 years for this story to come two weeks before the election when Trump is leading?

Gee what a coincidence

Why? Does this story even register in his extraordinarily long list of bad behavior? Is it a coincidence that you’re blowing it off?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How believable it took 4 1/2 years for this story to come two weeks before the election when Trump is leading?

Gee what a coincidence

You must be new to politics.

Great American patriot heroes anonymously tell a tale of great horror and high import four years after the event but 14 days before an election. I’m sure it’s all true! Really huge deal.

Exactly. Big yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I bet he did complain about 60k but they’re adding on the part about Mexican.

60k is alot for anyone’s funeral. It isn’t Elvis or Michael Jackson we are talking about. He’s right

My dad died this year and everything was around $25K, and that was with cremation, a plain casket because of the cremation, and him already having paid for the niche for the ashes. Having a reception after a funeral is like throwing a wedding but you don’t know how many people are coming.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From your link:

Regarding Trump’s “f-word Mexican” comment, Pfeiffer wrote: “President Donald Trump never said that. This is an outrageous lie from The Atlantic two weeks before the election.” He provided statements from Patel and a spokesman for Meadows, who denied having heard Trump make the statement. Via Pfeiffer, Meadows’s spokesman also denied that Trump had ordered Meadows not to pay for the funeral.

The statement from Patel that Pfeiffer sent me said: “As someone who was present in the room with President Trump, he strongly urged that Spc. Vanessa Guillen’s grieving family should not have to bear the cost of any funeral arrangements, even offering to personally pay himself in order to honor her life and sacrifice. In addition, President Trump was able to have the Department of Defense designate her death as occurring ‘in the line of duty,’ which gave her full military honors and provided her family access to benefits, services, and complete financial assistance.”

+1
I was just about to post the above. This OP is flat-out lying. How dishonest to not even include the rest of the article. And how typical. Here is some more from the same article:

Shortly after I emailed a series of questions to a Trump spokesperson, Alex Pfeiffer, I received an email from Khawam, who asked me to publish a statement from Mayra Guillén, Vanessa’s sister. Pfeiffer then emailed me the same statement. “I am beyond grateful for all the support President Donald Trump showed our family during a trying time,” the statement reads. “I witnessed firsthand how President Trump honors our nation’s heroes’ service. We are grateful for everything he has done and continues to do to support our troops.”

OP linked the entire article.

OP was counting on no one actually reading it and discovering that the parts she chose to quote were FAKE. Honestly - you people mock any report that relies on anonymous sources, as long as it's a critique of a Democrat. But suddenly, those anonymous sources are so very credible if the target is Trump (or any Republican). Your utter hypocrisy would be amusing if it wasn't so completely pathetic.

Someone’s spokesperson denying something doesn’t make it FAKE. Are you 12?

Anonymous sources claiming one thing or another doesn't make it REAL. JFC.

Are you this angry when your orange idol says "Many people are saying" and then spews some ridiculous lie? Please be honest now!

Actually, yes. And he's certainly not my idol, orange or not. It'll be fun trotting this thread out the next time we get anonymous sources telling us about something Kamala Harris did, which no doubt, you'll deny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No Mexican’s funeral is going to cost $60 unless it’s a cartel chieftain. President Trump was dead on. These people saw the gravy train once he agreed to pay for the funeral, but that would have been maybe $5 or 6k. Not ten times that much.

Dems were stupid to push this story. It shows President Trump is a hell of a negotiator which we need to end the Ukraine, Iran and Taiwan disasters.

Dems didn't push the story, A journalist researched it and his platform published it.

We do not live in an authoritarian country, at least yet.

[Anonymous]

Trump and his worshipers are just hateful weak minded losers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump and his worshipers are just hateful weak minded losers.

[twitter] https://x.com/davidsacks/status/1848894985976090703?s=46&t=vCkHaGKqgGqkHvzMN6JuFg[/twitter]