Kamala Harris Says Anyone Who Breaks Into Her House Is ‘Getting Shot’

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris got a ton of death threats in 2019-2020 in the run up to the election. It was terrible. Not surprised she bought a gun.

Any evidence the FBI actually investigated any of those tons of Kamala death threats?

And any arrests made?

Who cares? There haven't been any investigations or arrests made to people that were after me yet I still secure a firearm for protection at home. Is that a problem? Just don't force you way into the homes of strangers and you won't have to worry about people like Harris and I. Grow some.

Sure.

[Anonymous]

Kamala fantasizes out loud about her desire to shoot someone and democrats are ok with it? What a strange election cycle we are trapped in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That’s sweet because she’s prosecuted plenty of people who shot in self defense

Cite?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.

Did Harris make that choice of what firearm to own? Yes she did.

Do other people get that same choice? Not according to her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kamala fantasizes out loud about her desire to shoot someone and democrats are ok with it? What a strange election cycle we are trapped in.

Yet zero evidence of one single death treat to Harris, let alone “tons”.

Totally laughable that Harris believes she should be entitled to personal ownership of guns, but other Americans should have their guns confiscated. Every life matters, not just her life.

[Anonymous]

In 2020, Harris condemned 'stand your ground' self defense laws, during an interview with the gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety.

She argued that those laws were 'used as an excuse if not a cover for people who are motivated by racism and racial profiling.'

'It has been used as an excuse to kill black and brown people,' she added.


Harris refused to seek the death penalty against a man suspected of being a gang member, Edwin Ramos, who shot and killed a father and his two sons, even though California allows the state to seek the death penalty for multiple murders by the same person. Not only did Ramos kill three innocent people, but he also had previously been charged with robbing a pregnant woman.

In a different case, when a gang member killed San Francisco police Officer Isaac Espinoza and wounded his partner, Harris again refused to seek the death penalty.


As district attorney, Harris also demonstrated gross incompetence. For example, she didn’t disclose exculpatory evidence to defense attorneys about an unethical police expert, resulting in more than 600 cases being dismissed. And later on, as state attorney general, she was excoriated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit for using a falsified confession.

https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/kamala-harris-trying-run-her-prosecutorial-record

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.

Did Harris make that choice of what firearm to own? Yes she did.

Do other people get that same choice? Not according to her.

She should have had the freedom to choose between any six-shooter or deer rifle on the market? Of course she should! Should she have access to military assault rifles, grenades, missiles, tanks, bombs... you know weapons intended to kill or wound lots of people very quickly.... no, of course she shouldn't have that choice and anyone with an IQ above 90 agrees with me. If you disagree, please do your best to explain why private citizens should have access to grenades, bombs, or assault rifles.

[Anonymous]

Wow. That’s quite a rap for Kamala!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In 2020, Harris condemned 'stand your ground' self defense laws, during an interview with the gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety.

She argued that those laws were 'used as an excuse if not a cover for people who are motivated by racism and racial profiling.'

'It has been used as an excuse to kill black and brown people,' she added.


Harris refused to seek the death penalty against a man suspected of being a gang member, Edwin Ramos, who shot and killed a father and his two sons, even though California allows the state to seek the death penalty for multiple murders by the same person. Not only did Ramos kill three innocent people, but he also had previously been charged with robbing a pregnant woman.

In a different case, when a gang member killed San Francisco police Officer Isaac Espinoza and wounded his partner, Harris again refused to seek the death penalty.


As district attorney, Harris also demonstrated gross incompetence. For example, she didn’t disclose exculpatory evidence to defense attorneys about an unethical police expert, resulting in more than 600 cases being dismissed. And later on, as state attorney general, she was excoriated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit for using a falsified confession.

https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/kamala-harris-trying-run-her-prosecutorial-record

Is Kamala still proud of herself?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.

Did Harris make that choice of what firearm to own? Yes she did.

Do other people get that same choice? Not according to her.

She should have had the freedom to choose between any six-shooter or deer rifle on the market? Of course she should! Should she have access to military assault rifles, grenades, missiles, tanks, bombs... you know weapons intended to kill or wound lots of people very quickly.... no, of course she shouldn't have that choice and anyone with an IQ above 90 agrees with me. If you disagree, please do your best to explain why private citizens should have access to grenades, bombs, or assault rifles.

Your definition of an assault rifle?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.

Did Harris make that choice of what firearm to own? Yes she did.

Do other people get that same choice? Not according to her.

She should have had the freedom to choose between any six-shooter or deer rifle on the market? Of course she should! Should she have access to military assault rifles, grenades, missiles, tanks, bombs... you know weapons intended to kill or wound lots of people very quickly.... no, of course she shouldn't have that choice and anyone with an IQ above 90 agrees with me. If you disagree, please do your best to explain why private citizens should have access to grenades, bombs, or assault rifles.

"you know weapons intended to kill or wound lots of people very quickly"

What the hell do you think a pistol can do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.

Did Harris make that choice of what firearm to own? Yes she did.

Do other people get that same choice? Not according to her.

She should have had the freedom to choose between any six-shooter or deer rifle on the market? Of course she should! Should she have access to military assault rifles, grenades, missiles, tanks, bombs... you know weapons intended to kill or wound lots of people very quickly.... no, of course she shouldn't have that choice and anyone with an IQ above 90 agrees with me. If you disagree, please do your best to explain why private citizens should have access to grenades, bombs, or assault rifles.

So she's going to send the police into people's private residences to "inspect" firearms?

Have you ever heard of the 4th amendment?

[Anonymous]

Just overheard:

Q: What would happen if someone broke into your home?

Old Democrat answer: "We all have a responsibility to create the kind of caring communities where..."

New Democrat (Harris/Walz) answer: "I have a gun. I'd shoot them dead."

Suck it, MAGA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.

Did Harris make that choice of what firearm to own? Yes she did.

Do other people get that same choice? Not according to her.

She should have had the freedom to choose between any six-shooter or deer rifle on the market? Of course she should! Should she have access to military assault rifles, grenades, missiles, tanks, bombs... you know weapons intended to kill or wound lots of people very quickly.... no, of course she shouldn't have that choice and anyone with an IQ above 90 agrees with me. If you disagree, please do your best to explain why private citizens should have access to grenades, bombs, or assault rifles.

Your definition of an assault rifle?

A standard infantry weapon for modern armies that is light, portable, and can quickly and accurately deliver a high volume of fire to create mass casualty in a brief period of time. AR-15 is an example. I don't have a need for that weapon in my house just as I don't have a need for bombs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.

Did Harris make that choice of what firearm to own? Yes she did.

Do other people get that same choice? Not according to her.

She should have had the freedom to choose between any six-shooter or deer rifle on the market? Of course she should! Should she have access to military assault rifles, grenades, missiles, tanks, bombs... you know weapons intended to kill or wound lots of people very quickly.... no, of course she shouldn't have that choice and anyone with an IQ above 90 agrees with me. If you disagree, please do your best to explain why private citizens should have access to grenades, bombs, or assault rifles.

Your definition of an assault rifle?

A standard infantry weapon for modern armies that is light, portable, and can quickly and accurately deliver a high volume of fire to create mass casualty in a brief period of time. AR-15 is an example. I don't have a need for that weapon in my house just as I don't have a need for bombs.

It isn't up to you. It's none of your business.