DCUA

[Anonymous]

What did you accomplish for posting this? NADA

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Last time ASA lost 0-6 so 2-2 is not bad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Asa abusing bio band got couple of over grown 09

Who won?

Sorry to disappoint but there were no 09s.

Heard ASA had at least 1 2011 playing

2-2 (T)

Beating or tie a academy team is a big accomplishment; boys should be proud

What did team accomplished? NADA!

[Anonymous]

Huge week for ASA, T and W.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Huge week for ASA, T and W.

Not a single team has failed to beat West Virginia. You still stink.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Last time ASA lost 0-6 so 2-2 is not bad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Asa abusing bio band got couple of over grown 09

Who won?

Sorry to disappoint but there were no 09s.

Heard ASA had at least 1 2011 playing

2-2 (T)

Beating or tie a academy team is a big accomplishment; boys should be proud

The Guest players for sure should definitely be proud of their contribution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Huge week for ASA, T and W.

Not a single team has failed to beat West Virginia. You still stink.

This is a bit childish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Asa abusing bio band got couple of over grown 09

There were no bio-banded kids on the ASA team. All were 2010s and one was a 2011. You must have ASA confused with Bethesda.

Bethesda uses early bloomer (see: big) Guest players too?

Another symptom of what's seriously wrong with youth soccer.
Bringing in big guest players for a U14 game which basically tells your current players 'we don't have faith in you'.

Then you celebrate a tie like it's a world championship against several younger smaller players, since half DCU starters and top players sat out.

I get it... dcu, a collection of the "best players" in the area, expected to run all over a "weaker" local team, got out played, needed the ref to bail them out on a bs pk that she originally made a no call standing 10 ft away from and had the AR change the outcome. I guess id be bitter too, but i wouldn't come on to an anonymous forum to spread bs about bio banding and make excuses about couple big players (have you seen the majority of the kids on your team). While trying hard to minimize the asa kids and delusional about their kids spot on team, since half the kids on the field where dcu scrubs. Get a grip

Heard ASA mailbox filled this weekend with emails from DCU parents looking to transfer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Asa abusing bio band got couple of over grown 09

There were no bio-banded kids on the ASA team. All were 2010s and one was a 2011. You must have ASA confused with Bethesda.

Bethesda uses early bloomer (see: big) Guest players too?

Another symptom of what's seriously wrong with youth soccer.
Bringing in big guest players for a U14 game which basically tells your current players 'we don't have faith in you'.

Then you celebrate a tie like it's a world championship against several younger smaller players, since half DCU starters and top players sat out.

I get it... dcu, a collection of the "best players" in the area, expected to run all over a "weaker" local team, got out played, needed the ref to bail them out on a bs pk that she originally made a no call standing 10 ft away from and had the AR change the outcome. I guess id be bitter too, but i wouldn't come on to an anonymous forum to spread bs about bio banding and make excuses about couple big players (have you seen the majority of the kids on your team). While trying hard to minimize the asa kids and delusional about their kids spot on team, since half the kids on the field where dcu scrubs. Get a grip

Heard ASA mailbox filled this weekend with emails from DCU parents looking to transfer.

DCU scout was out IDing ASA D line

[Anonymous]

Hi, Anonymous DCU and ASA 2010 parents. This is Lee. As many of you know, I'm a proud DC Urban Mom. Just wanted you all to know I've got nothing to do with these DCU v. ASA posts, in case you're playing the guess-the-posters game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Asa abusing bio band got couple of over grown 09

There were no bio-banded kids on the ASA team. All were 2010s and one was a 2011. You must have ASA confused with Bethesda.

Bethesda uses early bloomer (see: big) Guest players too?

Another symptom of what's seriously wrong with youth soccer.
Bringing in big guest players for a U14 game which basically tells your current players 'we don't have faith in you'.

Then you celebrate a tie like it's a world championship against several younger smaller players, since half DCU starters and top players sat out.

I get it... dcu, a collection of the "best players" in the area, expected to run all over a "weaker" local team, got out played, needed the ref to bail them out on a bs pk that she originally made a no call standing 10 ft away from and had the AR change the outcome. I guess id be bitter too, but i wouldn't come on to an anonymous forum to spread bs about bio banding and make excuses about couple big players (have you seen the majority of the kids on your team). While trying hard to minimize the asa kids and delusional about their kids spot on team, since half the kids on the field where dcu scrubs. Get a grip

Heard ASA mailbox filled this weekend with emails from DCU parents looking to transfer.

DCU scout was out IDing ASA D line

That goes without saying.
A league leading 21shutout games.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hi, Anonymous DCU and ASA 2010 parents. This is Lee. As many of you know, I'm a proud DC Urban Mom. Just wanted you all to know I've got nothing to do with these DCU v. ASA posts, in case you're playing the guess-the-posters game.

Disgruntle ASA parents posting or DCU parents still upset with 1-1 tie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi, Anonymous DCU and ASA 2010 parents. This is Lee. As many of you know, I'm a proud DC Urban Mom. Just wanted you all to know I've got nothing to do with these DCU v. ASA posts, in case you're playing the guess-the-posters game.

Disgruntle ASA parents posting or DCU parents still upset with 1-1 tie

As a neutral observer, I had to go to the MLS Next standings to see what all this hoopla is about regarding the demise of the DCU Academy U14's

Based on the facts and comments, the team had a single bad week by their standards after 7 months of stellar results with several players being out for different reasons.

That said, why are adults trying to spin a false narrative and carry on in this repulsive manner?
What's to gain?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi, Anonymous DCU and ASA 2010 parents. This is Lee. As many of you know, I'm a proud DC Urban Mom. Just wanted you all to know I've got nothing to do with these DCU v. ASA posts, in case you're playing the guess-the-posters game.

Disgruntle ASA parents posting or DCU parents still upset with 1-1 tie

As a neutral observer, I had to go to the MLS Next standings to see what all this hoopla is about regarding the demise of the DCU Academy U14's

Based on the facts and comments, the team had a single bad week by their standards after 7 months of stellar results with several players being out for different reasons.

That said, why are adults trying to spin a false narrative and carry on in this repulsive manner?
What's to gain?

Neutral observer? sure sounds like this poster from the first page, "which clearly shows your statement to be a deliberate lie to fuel a false narrative for your biased agenda."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi, Anonymous DCU and ASA 2010 parents. This is Lee. As many of you know, I'm a proud DC Urban Mom. Just wanted you all to know I've got nothing to do with these DCU v. ASA posts, in case you're playing the guess-the-posters game.

Disgruntle ASA parents posting or DCU parents still upset with 1-1 tie

As a neutral observer, I had to go to the MLS Next standings to see what all this hoopla is about regarding the demise of the DCU Academy U14's

Based on the facts and comments, the team had a single bad week by their standards after 7 months of stellar results with several players being out for different reasons.

That said, why are adults trying to spin a false narrative and carry on in this repulsive manner?
What's to gain?

Neutral observer? sure sounds like this poster from the first page, "which clearly shows your statement to be a deliberate lie to fuel a false narrative for your biased agenda."

Don't think they have a patent on English language

Are you responding to point out the facts are inaccurate while providing verifiable facts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi, Anonymous DCU and ASA 2010 parents. This is Lee. As many of you know, I'm a proud DC Urban Mom. Just wanted you all to know I've got nothing to do with these DCU v. ASA posts, in case you're playing the guess-the-posters game.

Disgruntle ASA parents posting or DCU parents still upset with 1-1 tie

As a neutral observer, I had to go to the MLS Next standings to see what all this hoopla is about regarding the demise of the DCU Academy U14's

Based on the facts and comments, the team had a single bad week by their standards after 7 months of stellar results with several players being out for different reasons.

That said, why are adults trying to spin a false narrative and carry on in this repulsive manner?
What's to gain?

Neutral observer? sure sounds like this poster from the first page, "which clearly shows your statement to be a deliberate lie to fuel a false narrative for your biased agenda."

wait, pointing out a lie doesn't make one neutral? hahahahah