Harvard admits record number of Asian American students while Black and Latino admits drop

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?

Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.

Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?

Diversity is an ideology in higher education. It is the new faith.

As it is, I find it funny some people believe the push to ban AA in at Harvard is white supremacy when it would only lead to even more Asians. Harvard has definitely increased the share of Asians in the student body due to pressure not to be so racist. So who is the real racist? White supremacists or Harvard?

We all know after AA is banned that the next step will be to call for adjustments to the process to reduce overrepresented Asians. It’s always been about falling white dominance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?

Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.

Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?

Diversity is an ideology in higher education. It is the new faith.

As it is, I find it funny some people believe the push to ban AA in at Harvard is white supremacy when it would only lead to even more Asians. Harvard has definitely increased the share of Asians in the student body due to pressure not to be so racist. So who is the real racist? White supremacists or Harvard?

We all know after AA is banned that the next step will be to call for adjustments to the process to reduce overrepresented Asians. It’s always been about falling white dominance.

Asians will never overtake white dominance. We know their game. They want to kiss enough a$& to be white adjacent and then try to take over. And cut all the other nonwhite throats in the process. It will never happen. It’s called white supremacy for a reason, but we will let you keep kissing a$&.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?

Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.

Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?

Diversity is an ideology in higher education. It is the new faith.

As it is, I find it funny some people believe the push to ban AA in at Harvard is white supremacy when it would only lead to even more Asians. Harvard has definitely increased the share of Asians in the student body due to pressure not to be so racist. So who is the real racist? White supremacists or Harvard?

We all know after AA is banned that the next step will be to call for adjustments to the process to reduce overrepresented Asians. It’s always been about falling white dominance.

Asians will never overtake white dominance. We know their game. They want to kiss enough a$& to be white adjacent and then try to take over. And cut all the other nonwhite throats in the process. It will never happen. It’s called white supremacy for a reason, but we will let you keep kissing a$&.

WTF?!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?

Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.

Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?

“Crackers” should take it up with ashkenazis who take half the “white” spots and are overrepresented 10-20x at top schools

[Anonymous]

Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?

Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.

Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?

Diversity is an ideology in higher education. It is the new faith.

As it is, I find it funny some people believe the push to ban AA in at Harvard is white supremacy when it would only lead to even more Asians. Harvard has definitely increased the share of Asians in the student body due to pressure not to be so racist. So who is the real racist? White supremacists or Harvard?

But- what about the crackers who have better merit than some of the URM ?? They fixed it for Asians, but still okay discriminating against Caucasian kids? I guess crackers need to sue Harvard next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.

The value of dcum is it provides a behind the curtain look as to people”s real thoughts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.

The value of dcum is it provides a behind the curtain look as to people”s real thoughts

4chan for the Lily Pulitzer set.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?

Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.

Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?

“Crackers” should take it up with ashkenazis who take half the “white” spots and are overrepresented 10-20x at top schools

Another WTF!? What is WRONG with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.

The value of dcum is it provides a behind the curtain look as to people”s real thoughts

4chan for the Lily Pulitzer set.

So true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?

Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.

Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?

“Crackers” should take it up with ashkenazis who take half the “white” spots and are overrepresented 10-20x at top schools

Not overrepresented relative to their qualifications

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.

The value of dcum is it provides a behind the curtain look as to people”s real thoughts

4chan for the Lily Pulitzer set.

Omg

😆

I love this

Best post I’ve read on dcum in a long time

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?

Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.

Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?

“Crackers” should take it up with ashkenazis who take half the “white” spots and are overrepresented 10-20x at top schools

Not overrepresented relative to their qualifications

Likewise Asians aren’t overrepresented relative to their qualifications

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.

The value of dcum is it provides a behind the curtain look as to people”s real thoughts

4chan for the Lily Pulitzer set.

Sure, lily pulitzer set showed themselves out long time ago. Asians trolling themselves at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would depend on how diverse the Asian group was. The danger is that a university where everyone majors in computer science and plays the violin (a stereotype, I know) isn't going to be as academically strong in other areas. Harvard isn't just known for producing mathematicians. It's knowing for producing politicians and climate change activists and great feminist thinkers and theologians and authors and mayors, etc. Artists. If the vast majority of those admitted are admitted because they scored really high on the math section of the SAT and have lots of AP statistics courses then it's likely that none of them will write the next great Broadway musical or become a journalist -- particularly if they have parents who actively steer them away from the pursuit of these types of goals. I was a reader for a prestigious internaitonal scholarship awhile ago and I remember wondering what would happen when everyone who applied for the fellowship was a stats major or data science, or if maybe no one would apply at all.

Way to perpetuate the stereotype of Asians being math nerds. These kids are scoring 1500+ on the SATs, which means that they're scoring at least a 700 on the verbal portion of the SAT.

The ^PP is math challenged. Maybe they need to focus on math more. LOL

Forgive me but maybe I am too... can you explain?

The ^^PP insinuated that Asian Americans are only good at STEM. The ^PP indicated that Asian Americans at those schools typically score 1500+ on the SAT scores, which means that they, at minimum, scored a 700 on the English portion of the SATs, ie, they are good at Engilsh/writing, too.

As an example: The RMIB magnet is like 70% Asian American (or something like that). RMIB is a manget program that is heavy, and I mean *heavy* on writing. These kids are scoring high on the SATs, AP English/IB English exams. Many are into music and arts, too. They write for the school newspaper, write plays, server as Student members on the board of education, participate in SGA, produce amazing art and music. They are not just STEM focused.

I'm sure the ^^PP would not appreciate if someone stated that URM only focus on sports and not on academics, right?