2022 MSDE School Report Cards Are Out. How did your school do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You forgot the BCC inside the Ws/

I was told B-CC is NOT a W school so I didn't want to get admonished for making that mistake.

BCC isn’t a W school!

Correct! I don't see a W anywhere in the name: Bethesda-Chevy Chase.

Yeah, it's a W. Just as some schools with a W aren't (Watkins Mill, Wheaton), B-CC is a W.

BCC was never one of the W schools. Sorry.

Stop trying to make fetch happen.

Signed,

Lifelong MoCo resident

Long ago many considered BCC superior to the W's. In fact, in the 70s TIME magazine said BCC was the best HS in the US.

Well, I'm nearly 50. Lifelong MoCo resident. The BCC feeder schools have always drawn a less affluent mix of students as compared to the W schools. And they've always been insecure about not being from the upper crust of Potomac.

The reality is that the W schools were labeled decades ago and trying to pretend BCC is part of the group is just silly.

PS - I didn't go to a W school (I went to private school), and my kids don't go to a W school (they are in public school).

Sure, but anything perpetuating the use of the phrase "W schools" is just silly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if there was a way to just get a list of all MCPS schools rather than having to look up one at a time.

Use this page: https://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/SchoolsList/Index?l=15

OK, fine. Here they are

School Total Earned Points
Whitman 83.6
Churchill 82.8
Wootton 80.4
BCC 76.2
Walter Johnson 76
Richard Montgomery 70.4
Poolesville 69.7
Sherwood 68.8
Northwest 68
Clarksburg 66.9
Damascus 66.3
Quince Orchard 65.7
Rockville 65.3
Einstein 63.9
Blair 63.2
Magruder 62.1
Wheaton 61.6
Springbrook 61.6
Blake 61.1
Paint Branch 59.2
Seneca Valley 58.3
Northwood 55.8
Gaithersburg 53
Watkins Mill 52.2
Kennedy 49.2

Pretty close to the reverse of a FARMS rate-sorted list. So neither surprising nor meaningful.

+1 Almost to the exact order of lowest to highest FARMS. I mean, you could've just listed the FARMs rate and not bother looking at MSDE.

I think the FARMS rate is highly correlated with English Language Learners. There are several different metrics that take a hit because of ELLs. When this new rating system came out I was pretty disgusted, because it’s effectively useless the way it is set-up. Pull all data for ELLs into their own category for 4 years after arriving in US. Leave the main categories with only data from kids who speak English, so those comparisons are more meaningful.

But then you would know exactly how many undocumented students are in your schools being funded by MoCo taxpayers instead of their home countries. Dems cannot let you know that.

A) Not all ELLs are undocumented;

B) Every single At a Glance document for every single school in MCPS shows you the number of kids receiving ESOL services;

C) The report card does the same thing.

And no one is so simple to think that they are. But it is undeniable that MCPS has had a large and growing undocumented population for years, and that the population places a tremendous strain on resources. Don't try to negate people's concerns with simplistic arguments.

So long as there are immigrant children of any sort, MCPS will (and legally must) educate them.

Perhaps those who don't want immigrants can work to help keep other countries in better shape so there are fewer refugees of all sorts.

Not the PP but I have no issue with educating immigrants. This is a very transient area. The issue comes down to integrating classes and the whole PC version of keeping kids mixed in color, sex, and abilities. MCPS needs to let this go because no one is learning this way. The top reading groups never meet and the bottom groups meet more but not enough for them to ever catch up.

In 1st grade if there are 100 kids and 4 classes in an ES and right now MCPS has 4 classes of 25 kids each of varying levels and pulling off in groups.

Why not put the bottom 20 in one class with a teacher and a para.
Put the two middle classes with 25 kids and they share a para
Top class has 30 kids and no para

Change them for math levels in afternoon - similar levels.

I just don't understand the mixed groupings at all. The kids struggling are embarrassed and act out, don't care, or are too quiet. The kids that are smarter never meet in their groups, are always bored, can act out, and many times are used by exhausted teachers, as mini helpers to other kids struggling - embarrassing both. There is rarely ever full education going on. Just groups and busy work. I have volunteered in enough classes in ES before and after common/integrated classrooms to see that it is a failure.

I don’t think you’ve volunteered in that many classrooms if you think this is the solution. You have a way oversimplified view of children and learning. I fully believe in cohorting older students, but no, you don’t do what you’ve proposed with six year olds.

DP

What is your age limit?

MCPS does mixed ability for all ages until high school except for in Math.

Are you okay with cohorting (is that a made-up MCPS word?) 3rd graders? I am. Some third graders read very well and some don’t. As long as the groups are fluid, it’s fine.

Instead, my 3rd grader is stuck in a class where her reading group barely ever meets. The teacher is too busy working with the kids who are below level. SO MUCH wasted time.

Put yourself in the shoes of a parent whose kid of in the bottom group and as a result feels that at 7 they have already failed in life. Would you still advocate for this attach that stigmatizes kids so young?

.

It isn't the kids that do this. It is parents like you. If you really wanted to help your child you would want them in smaller environment with kids similar to him with extra teacher and para support so they can actually improve and learn and get up to the grade standards quickly.

What you want to do is throw the struggling kids in with everyone so not to stigmatize them, but yet you are stunting them. Protecting them by making them look average but keep them far below average because they aren't getting enough help. And they see kids in their class succeeding easily. They see them barely in groups, getting done their busy work in 5 minutes what takes them the entire group break to do and if not, they see the teacher ask smart Joey to help them learn the work which is so humiliating. Joey rolls his eyes because he just wants to read his book at his desk. So instead they usually just quickly get done the work, throw it in the bin and not learn anything. Teacher is too overwhelmed to look over and realize how much kid is struggling. And each year kids like this slip through the cracks over and over again, but at least they weren't stigmatized. We just teach them to expect less, work average, and get more.

I agree with this 100%

Mixing the kids helps No one and wastes so much time.

There have been so many actual studies done on this, but okay...some random DCUM poster says it wastes time,so it must be true! It really comes down to teacher preference. Teachers know how their students work together in the classroom better than anyone else and understand what works and what doesn't. It's up to them how they do small groups because they understand what unique needs their students have. There is no blanket, uniform, correct answer here..but DCUM gonna DCUM.

You might have a point if not for the dismal reading test scores year after year that reflect poor teaching.

Ahh yes, it’s all the teachers fault. Parents have no responsibility for their own kids, my bad.

Newsflash, most of the kids at the bottom have home issues, single parent, no to low income, trauma, learning disabilities, and even a loving parent may be working 2 jobs to put food on the table. They don’t have the luxury of tutors or even a hour to work with them. Some parents can no longer help with homework by grade 2. That is why having a class size of 15-20 for the bottom of the class would work so much better. Get a para, really work with them. Stop leaving them in mixed classes of 30 kids struggling and fake it until they make it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if there was a way to just get a list of all MCPS schools rather than having to look up one at a time.

Use this page: https://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/SchoolsList/Index?l=15

OK, fine. Here they are

School Total Earned Points
Whitman 83.6
Churchill 82.8
Wootton 80.4
BCC 76.2
Walter Johnson 76
Richard Montgomery 70.4
Poolesville 69.7
Sherwood 68.8
Northwest 68
Clarksburg 66.9
Damascus 66.3
Quince Orchard 65.7
Rockville 65.3
Einstein 63.9
Blair 63.2
Magruder 62.1
Wheaton 61.6
Springbrook 61.6
Blake 61.1
Paint Branch 59.2
Seneca Valley 58.3
Northwood 55.8
Gaithersburg 53
Watkins Mill 52.2
Kennedy 49.2

Pretty close to the reverse of a FARMS rate-sorted list. So neither surprising nor meaningful.

+1 Almost to the exact order of lowest to highest FARMS. I mean, you could've just listed the FARMs rate and not bother looking at MSDE.

I think the FARMS rate is highly correlated with English Language Learners. There are several different metrics that take a hit because of ELLs. When this new rating system came out I was pretty disgusted, because it’s effectively useless the way it is set-up. Pull all data for ELLs into their own category for 4 years after arriving in US. Leave the main categories with only data from kids who speak English, so those comparisons are more meaningful.

But then you would know exactly how many undocumented students are in your schools being funded by MoCo taxpayers instead of their home countries. Dems cannot let you know that.

A) Not all ELLs are undocumented;

B) Every single At a Glance document for every single school in MCPS shows you the number of kids receiving ESOL services;

C) The report card does the same thing.

And no one is so simple to think that they are. But it is undeniable that MCPS has had a large and growing undocumented population for years, and that the population places a tremendous strain on resources. Don't try to negate people's concerns with simplistic arguments.

So long as there are immigrant children of any sort, MCPS will (and legally must) educate them.

Perhaps those who don't want immigrants can work to help keep other countries in better shape so there are fewer refugees of all sorts.

Not the PP but I have no issue with educating immigrants. This is a very transient area. The issue comes down to integrating classes and the whole PC version of keeping kids mixed in color, sex, and abilities. MCPS needs to let this go because no one is learning this way. The top reading groups never meet and the bottom groups meet more but not enough for them to ever catch up.

In 1st grade if there are 100 kids and 4 classes in an ES and right now MCPS has 4 classes of 25 kids each of varying levels and pulling off in groups.

Why not put the bottom 20 in one class with a teacher and a para.
Put the two middle classes with 25 kids and they share a para
Top class has 30 kids and no para

Change them for math levels in afternoon - similar levels.

I just don't understand the mixed groupings at all. The kids struggling are embarrassed and act out, don't care, or are too quiet. The kids that are smarter never meet in their groups, are always bored, can act out, and many times are used by exhausted teachers, as mini helpers to other kids struggling - embarrassing both. There is rarely ever full education going on. Just groups and busy work. I have volunteered in enough classes in ES before and after common/integrated classrooms to see that it is a failure.

I don’t think you’ve volunteered in that many classrooms if you think this is the solution. You have a way oversimplified view of children and learning. I fully believe in cohorting older students, but no, you don’t do what you’ve proposed with six year olds.

DP

What is your age limit?

MCPS does mixed ability for all ages until high school except for in Math.

Are you okay with cohorting (is that a made-up MCPS word?) 3rd graders? I am. Some third graders read very well and some don’t. As long as the groups are fluid, it’s fine.

Instead, my 3rd grader is stuck in a class where her reading group barely ever meets. The teacher is too busy working with the kids who are below level. SO MUCH wasted time.

Put yourself in the shoes of a parent whose kid of in the bottom group and as a result feels that at 7 they have already failed in life. Would you still advocate for this attach that stigmatizes kids so young?

.

It isn't the kids that do this. It is parents like you. If you really wanted to help your child you would want them in smaller environment with kids similar to him with extra teacher and para support so they can actually improve and learn and get up to the grade standards quickly.

What you want to do is throw the struggling kids in with everyone so not to stigmatize them, but yet you are stunting them. Protecting them by making them look average but keep them far below average because they aren't getting enough help. And they see kids in their class succeeding easily. They see them barely in groups, getting done their busy work in 5 minutes what takes them the entire group break to do and if not, they see the teacher ask smart Joey to help them learn the work which is so humiliating. Joey rolls his eyes because he just wants to read his book at his desk. So instead they usually just quickly get done the work, throw it in the bin and not learn anything. Teacher is too overwhelmed to look over and realize how much kid is struggling. And each year kids like this slip through the cracks over and over again, but at least they weren't stigmatized. We just teach them to expect less, work average, and get more.

I agree with this 100%

Mixing the kids helps No one and wastes so much time.

There have been so many actual studies done on this, but okay...some random DCUM poster says it wastes time,so it must be true! It really comes down to teacher preference. Teachers know how their students work together in the classroom better than anyone else and understand what works and what doesn't. It's up to them how they do small groups because they understand what unique needs their students have. There is no blanket, uniform, correct answer here..but DCUM gonna DCUM.

You might have a point if not for the dismal reading test scores year after year that reflect poor teaching.

Ahh yes, it’s all the teachers fault. Parents have no responsibility for their own kids, my bad.

Newsflash, most of the kids at the bottom have home issues, single parent, no to low income, trauma, learning disabilities, and even a loving parent may be working 2 jobs to put food on the table. They don’t have the luxury of tutors or even a hour to work with them. Some parents can no longer help with homework by grade 2. That is why having a class size of 15-20 for the bottom of the class would work so much better. Get a para, really work with them. Stop leaving them in mixed classes of 30 kids struggling and fake it until they make it.

This would never happen because MCPS cares more about protecting the feelings of those at the bottom than actually helping them in order to succeed. They think that the kids would feel bad about not being in the regular classes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You forgot the BCC inside the Ws/

I was told B-CC is NOT a W school so I didn't want to get admonished for making that mistake.

BCC isn’t a W school!

Correct! I don't see a W anywhere in the name: Bethesda-Chevy Chase.

Yeah, it's a W. Just as some schools with a W aren't (Watkins Mill, Wheaton), B-CC is a W.

BCC was never one of the W schools. Sorry.

Stop trying to make fetch happen.

Signed,

Lifelong MoCo resident

Long ago many considered BCC superior to the W's. In fact, in the 70s TIME magazine said BCC was the best HS in the US.

Well, I'm nearly 50. Lifelong MoCo resident. The BCC feeder schools have always drawn a less affluent mix of students as compared to the W schools. And they've always been insecure about not being from the upper crust of Potomac.

The reality is that the W schools were labeled decades ago and trying to pretend BCC is part of the group is just silly.

PS - I didn't go to a W school (I went to private school), and my kids don't go to a W school (they are in public school).

Sure, but anything perpetuating the use of the phrase "W schools" is just silly

ICYMI: the legit W schools have a W in their name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You forgot the BCC inside the Ws/

I was told B-CC is NOT a W school so I didn't want to get admonished for making that mistake.

BCC isn’t a W school!

Correct! I don't see a W anywhere in the name: Bethesda-Chevy Chase.

Yeah, it's a W. Just as some schools with a W aren't (Watkins Mill, Wheaton), B-CC is a W.

BCC was never one of the W schools. Sorry.

Stop trying to make fetch happen.

Signed,

Lifelong MoCo resident

Long ago many considered BCC superior to the W's. In fact, in the 70s TIME magazine said BCC was the best HS in the US.

Well, I'm nearly 50. Lifelong MoCo resident. The BCC feeder schools have always drawn a less affluent mix of students as compared to the W schools. And they've always been insecure about not being from the upper crust of Potomac.

The reality is that the W schools were labeled decades ago and trying to pretend BCC is part of the group is just silly.

PS - I didn't go to a W school (I went to private school), and my kids don't go to a W school (they are in public school).

Sure, but anything perpetuating the use of the phrase "W schools" is just silly

ICYMI: the legit W schools have a W in their name.

So glad to hear Watkins Mill is a W school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if there was a way to just get a list of all MCPS schools rather than having to look up one at a time.

Use this page: https://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/SchoolsList/Index?l=15

OK, fine. Here they are

School Total Earned Points
Whitman 83.6
Churchill 82.8
Wootton 80.4
BCC 76.2
Walter Johnson 76
Richard Montgomery 70.4
Poolesville 69.7
Sherwood 68.8
Northwest 68
Clarksburg 66.9
Damascus 66.3
Quince Orchard 65.7
Rockville 65.3
Einstein 63.9
Blair 63.2
Magruder 62.1
Wheaton 61.6
Springbrook 61.6
Blake 61.1
Paint Branch 59.2
Seneca Valley 58.3
Northwood 55.8
Gaithersburg 53
Watkins Mill 52.2
Kennedy 49.2

Pretty close to the reverse of a FARMS rate-sorted list. So neither surprising nor meaningful.

+1 Almost to the exact order of lowest to highest FARMS. I mean, you could've just listed the FARMs rate and not bother looking at MSDE.

I think the FARMS rate is highly correlated with English Language Learners. There are several different metrics that take a hit because of ELLs. When this new rating system came out I was pretty disgusted, because it’s effectively useless the way it is set-up. Pull all data for ELLs into their own category for 4 years after arriving in US. Leave the main categories with only data from kids who speak English, so those comparisons are more meaningful.

But then you would know exactly how many undocumented students are in your schools being funded by MoCo taxpayers instead of their home countries. Dems cannot let you know that.

A) Not all ELLs are undocumented;

B) Every single At a Glance document for every single school in MCPS shows you the number of kids receiving ESOL services;

C) The report card does the same thing.

And no one is so simple to think that they are. But it is undeniable that MCPS has had a large and growing undocumented population for years, and that the population places a tremendous strain on resources. Don't try to negate people's concerns with simplistic arguments.

So long as there are immigrant children of any sort, MCPS will (and legally must) educate them.

Perhaps those who don't want immigrants can work to help keep other countries in better shape so there are fewer refugees of all sorts.

Not the PP but I have no issue with educating immigrants. This is a very transient area. The issue comes down to integrating classes and the whole PC version of keeping kids mixed in color, sex, and abilities. MCPS needs to let this go because no one is learning this way. The top reading groups never meet and the bottom groups meet more but not enough for them to ever catch up.

In 1st grade if there are 100 kids and 4 classes in an ES and right now MCPS has 4 classes of 25 kids each of varying levels and pulling off in groups.

Why not put the bottom 20 in one class with a teacher and a para.
Put the two middle classes with 25 kids and they share a para
Top class has 30 kids and no para

Change them for math levels in afternoon - similar levels.

I just don't understand the mixed groupings at all. The kids struggling are embarrassed and act out, don't care, or are too quiet. The kids that are smarter never meet in their groups, are always bored, can act out, and many times are used by exhausted teachers, as mini helpers to other kids struggling - embarrassing both. There is rarely ever full education going on. Just groups and busy work. I have volunteered in enough classes in ES before and after common/integrated classrooms to see that it is a failure.

I don’t think you’ve volunteered in that many classrooms if you think this is the solution. You have a way oversimplified view of children and learning. I fully believe in cohorting older students, but no, you don’t do what you’ve proposed with six year olds.

DP

What is your age limit?

MCPS does mixed ability for all ages until high school except for in Math.

Are you okay with cohorting (is that a made-up MCPS word?) 3rd graders? I am. Some third graders read very well and some don’t. As long as the groups are fluid, it’s fine.

Instead, my 3rd grader is stuck in a class where her reading group barely ever meets. The teacher is too busy working with the kids who are below level. SO MUCH wasted time.

Put yourself in the shoes of a parent whose kid of in the bottom group and as a result feels that at 7 they have already failed in life. Would you still advocate for this attach that stigmatizes kids so young?

.

It isn't the kids that do this. It is parents like you. If you really wanted to help your child you would want them in smaller environment with kids similar to him with extra teacher and para support so they can actually improve and learn and get up to the grade standards quickly.

What you want to do is throw the struggling kids in with everyone so not to stigmatize them, but yet you are stunting them. Protecting them by making them look average but keep them far below average because they aren't getting enough help. And they see kids in their class succeeding easily. They see them barely in groups, getting done their busy work in 5 minutes what takes them the entire group break to do and if not, they see the teacher ask smart Joey to help them learn the work which is so humiliating. Joey rolls his eyes because he just wants to read his book at his desk. So instead they usually just quickly get done the work, throw it in the bin and not learn anything. Teacher is too overwhelmed to look over and realize how much kid is struggling. And each year kids like this slip through the cracks over and over again, but at least they weren't stigmatized. We just teach them to expect less, work average, and get more.

I agree with this 100%

Mixing the kids helps No one and wastes so much time.

There have been so many actual studies done on this, but okay...some random DCUM poster says it wastes time,so it must be true! It really comes down to teacher preference. Teachers know how their students work together in the classroom better than anyone else and understand what works and what doesn't. It's up to them how they do small groups because they understand what unique needs their students have. There is no blanket, uniform, correct answer here..but DCUM gonna DCUM.

You might have a point if not for the dismal reading test scores year after year that reflect poor teaching.

Ahh yes, it’s all the teachers fault. Parents have no responsibility for their own kids, my bad.

Newsflash, most of the kids at the bottom have home issues, single parent, no to low income, trauma, learning disabilities, and even a loving parent may be working 2 jobs to put food on the table. They don’t have the luxury of tutors or even a hour to work with them. Some parents can no longer help with homework by grade 2. That is why having a class size of 15-20 for the bottom of the class would work so much better. Get a para, really work with them. Stop leaving them in mixed classes of 30 kids struggling and fake it until they make it.

How is that a newsflash? It’s definitely not. Actually super sad that people continue to have children they know they cannot support (and I don’t mean financially). Parenting is a lot more than birthing a kid and then throwing them to the school systems to do the heavy lifting for you and then be shocked we schools don’t have the resources to help your kid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BCC is not a W. If you’re referring to the wealthier mcps clusters, then you would say “W schools and BCC,” or something like that.

You figured out what the W really stands for! Not the name on the school or Wheaton and Watkins Mill would be Ws.

People always said W was for wealth and white. I don't honestly know but that sounds about right.

Yes it stands for white and wealthy, but BCC was never included because it drew kids from Silver Spring thus it had "too many" Black and Brown kids for their liking.
Same reason Churchill and Whitman didn't consider Wootton to be part of the W because the school is located in Rockville. The mindset was W schools had to be in Chevy Chase, Bethesda and Potomac. Wootton fought hard to be included and for a while, it would not be out of ordinary for some Wootton parents to claim that the school is in Potomac.
Unfortunately that's the story of the W's

^^Wow! Someone who actually knows the history of the Ws.

-another W alum

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if there was a way to just get a list of all MCPS schools rather than having to look up one at a time.

Use this page: https://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/SchoolsList/Index?l=15

OK, fine. Here they are

School Total Earned Points
Whitman 83.6
Churchill 82.8
Wootton 80.4
BCC 76.2
Walter Johnson 76
Richard Montgomery 70.4
Poolesville 69.7
Sherwood 68.8
Northwest 68
Clarksburg 66.9
Damascus 66.3
Quince Orchard 65.7
Rockville 65.3
Einstein 63.9
Blair 63.2
Magruder 62.1
Wheaton 61.6
Springbrook 61.6
Blake 61.1
Paint Branch 59.2
Seneca Valley 58.3
Northwood 55.8
Gaithersburg 53
Watkins Mill 52.2
Kennedy 49.2

Pretty close to the reverse of a FARMS rate-sorted list. So neither surprising nor meaningful.

+1 Almost to the exact order of lowest to highest FARMS. I mean, you could've just listed the FARMs rate and not bother looking at MSDE.

I think the FARMS rate is highly correlated with English Language Learners. There are several different metrics that take a hit because of ELLs. When this new rating system came out I was pretty disgusted, because it’s effectively useless the way it is set-up. Pull all data for ELLs into their own category for 4 years after arriving in US. Leave the main categories with only data from kids who speak English, so those comparisons are more meaningful.

But then you would know exactly how many undocumented students are in your schools being funded by MoCo taxpayers instead of their home countries. Dems cannot let you know that.

A) Not all ELLs are undocumented;

B) Every single At a Glance document for every single school in MCPS shows you the number of kids receiving ESOL services;

C) The report card does the same thing.

And no one is so simple to think that they are. But it is undeniable that MCPS has had a large and growing undocumented population for years, and that the population places a tremendous strain on resources. Don't try to negate people's concerns with simplistic arguments.

So long as there are immigrant children of any sort, MCPS will (and legally must) educate them.

Perhaps those who don't want immigrants can work to help keep other countries in better shape so there are fewer refugees of all sorts.

Not the PP but I have no issue with educating immigrants. This is a very transient area. The issue comes down to integrating classes and the whole PC version of keeping kids mixed in color, sex, and abilities. MCPS needs to let this go because no one is learning this way. The top reading groups never meet and the bottom groups meet more but not enough for them to ever catch up.

In 1st grade if there are 100 kids and 4 classes in an ES and right now MCPS has 4 classes of 25 kids each of varying levels and pulling off in groups.

Why not put the bottom 20 in one class with a teacher and a para.
Put the two middle classes with 25 kids and they share a para
Top class has 30 kids and no para

Change them for math levels in afternoon - similar levels.

I just don't understand the mixed groupings at all. The kids struggling are embarrassed and act out, don't care, or are too quiet. The kids that are smarter never meet in their groups, are always bored, can act out, and many times are used by exhausted teachers, as mini helpers to other kids struggling - embarrassing both. There is rarely ever full education going on. Just groups and busy work. I have volunteered in enough classes in ES before and after common/integrated classrooms to see that it is a failure.

I don’t think you’ve volunteered in that many classrooms if you think this is the solution. You have a way oversimplified view of children and learning. I fully believe in cohorting older students, but no, you don’t do what you’ve proposed with six year olds.

DP

What is your age limit?

MCPS does mixed ability for all ages until high school except for in Math.

Are you okay with cohorting (is that a made-up MCPS word?) 3rd graders? I am. Some third graders read very well and some don’t. As long as the groups are fluid, it’s fine.

Instead, my 3rd grader is stuck in a class where her reading group barely ever meets. The teacher is too busy working with the kids who are below level. SO MUCH wasted time.

Put yourself in the shoes of a parent whose kid of in the bottom group and as a result feels that at 7 they have already failed in life. Would you still advocate for this attach that stigmatizes kids so young?

.

It isn't the kids that do this. It is parents like you. If you really wanted to help your child you would want them in smaller environment with kids similar to him with extra teacher and para support so they can actually improve and learn and get up to the grade standards quickly.

What you want to do is throw the struggling kids in with everyone so not to stigmatize them, but yet you are stunting them. Protecting them by making them look average but keep them far below average because they aren't getting enough help. And they see kids in their class succeeding easily. They see them barely in groups, getting done their busy work in 5 minutes what takes them the entire group break to do and if not, they see the teacher ask smart Joey to help them learn the work which is so humiliating. Joey rolls his eyes because he just wants to read his book at his desk. So instead they usually just quickly get done the work, throw it in the bin and not learn anything. Teacher is too overwhelmed to look over and realize how much kid is struggling. And each year kids like this slip through the cracks over and over again, but at least they weren't stigmatized. We just teach them to expect less, work average, and get more.

I agree with this 100%

Mixing the kids helps No one and wastes so much time.

There have been so many actual studies done on this, but okay...some random DCUM poster says it wastes time,so it must be true! It really comes down to teacher preference. Teachers know how their students work together in the classroom better than anyone else and understand what works and what doesn't. It's up to them how they do small groups because they understand what unique needs their students have. There is no blanket, uniform, correct answer here..but DCUM gonna DCUM.

You might have a point if not for the dismal reading test scores year after year that reflect poor teaching.

Ahh yes, it’s all the teachers fault. Parents have no responsibility for their own kids, my bad.

Newsflash, most of the kids at the bottom have home issues, single parent, no to low income, trauma, learning disabilities, and even a loving parent may be working 2 jobs to put food on the table. They don’t have the luxury of tutors or even a hour to work with them. Some parents can no longer help with homework by grade 2. That is why having a class size of 15-20 for the bottom of the class would work so much better. Get a para, really work with them. Stop leaving them in mixed classes of 30 kids struggling and fake it until they make it.

How is that a newsflash? It’s definitely not. Actually super sad that people continue to have children they know they cannot support (and I don’t mean financially). Parenting is a lot more than birthing a kid and then throwing them to the school systems to do the heavy lifting for you and then be shocked we schools don’t have the resources to help your kid.

Naw, I think the shock comes when you realize that some schools actually do have the resources to help kids, but they all happen to be located in rich, white neighborhoods.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BCC is not a W. If you’re referring to the wealthier mcps clusters, then you would say “W schools and BCC,” or something like that.

You figured out what the W really stands for! Not the name on the school or Wheaton and Watkins Mill would be Ws.

People always said W was for wealth and white. I don't honestly know but that sounds about right.

Yes it stands for white and wealthy, but BCC was never included because it drew kids from Silver Spring thus it had "too many" Black and Brown kids for their liking.
Same reason Churchill and Whitman didn't consider Wootton to be part of the W because the school is located in Rockville. The mindset was W schools had to be in Chevy Chase, Bethesda and Potomac. Wootton fought hard to be included and for a while, it would not be out of ordinary for some Wootton parents to claim that the school is in Potomac.
Unfortunately that's the story of the W's

^^Wow! Someone who actually knows the history of the Ws.

-another W alum

And today Wootton is located in North Potomac.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if there was a way to just get a list of all MCPS schools rather than having to look up one at a time.

Use this page: https://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/SchoolsList/Index?l=15

OK, fine. Here they are

School Total Earned Points
Whitman 83.6
Churchill 82.8
Wootton 80.4
BCC 76.2
Walter Johnson 76
Richard Montgomery 70.4
Poolesville 69.7
Sherwood 68.8
Northwest 68
Clarksburg 66.9
Damascus 66.3
Quince Orchard 65.7
Rockville 65.3
Einstein 63.9
Blair 63.2
Magruder 62.1
Wheaton 61.6
Springbrook 61.6
Blake 61.1
Paint Branch 59.2
Seneca Valley 58.3
Northwood 55.8
Gaithersburg 53
Watkins Mill 52.2
Kennedy 49.2

Pretty close to the reverse of a FARMS rate-sorted list. So neither surprising nor meaningful.

+1 Almost to the exact order of lowest to highest FARMS. I mean, you could've just listed the FARMs rate and not bother looking at MSDE.

I think the FARMS rate is highly correlated with English Language Learners. There are several different metrics that take a hit because of ELLs. When this new rating system came out I was pretty disgusted, because it’s effectively useless the way it is set-up. Pull all data for ELLs into their own category for 4 years after arriving in US. Leave the main categories with only data from kids who speak English, so those comparisons are more meaningful.

But then you would know exactly how many undocumented students are in your schools being funded by MoCo taxpayers instead of their home countries. Dems cannot let you know that.

A) Not all ELLs are undocumented;

B) Every single At a Glance document for every single school in MCPS shows you the number of kids receiving ESOL services;

C) The report card does the same thing.

And no one is so simple to think that they are. But it is undeniable that MCPS has had a large and growing undocumented population for years, and that the population places a tremendous strain on resources. Don't try to negate people's concerns with simplistic arguments.

So long as there are immigrant children of any sort, MCPS will (and legally must) educate them.

Perhaps those who don't want immigrants can work to help keep other countries in better shape so there are fewer refugees of all sorts.

Not the PP but I have no issue with educating immigrants. This is a very transient area. The issue comes down to integrating classes and the whole PC version of keeping kids mixed in color, sex, and abilities. MCPS needs to let this go because no one is learning this way. The top reading groups never meet and the bottom groups meet more but not enough for them to ever catch up.

In 1st grade if there are 100 kids and 4 classes in an ES and right now MCPS has 4 classes of 25 kids each of varying levels and pulling off in groups.

Why not put the bottom 20 in one class with a teacher and a para.
Put the two middle classes with 25 kids and they share a para
Top class has 30 kids and no para

Change them for math levels in afternoon - similar levels.

I just don't understand the mixed groupings at all. The kids struggling are embarrassed and act out, don't care, or are too quiet. The kids that are smarter never meet in their groups, are always bored, can act out, and many times are used by exhausted teachers, as mini helpers to other kids struggling - embarrassing both. There is rarely ever full education going on. Just groups and busy work. I have volunteered in enough classes in ES before and after common/integrated classrooms to see that it is a failure.

I don’t think you’ve volunteered in that many classrooms if you think this is the solution. You have a way oversimplified view of children and learning. I fully believe in cohorting older students, but no, you don’t do what you’ve proposed with six year olds.

DP

What is your age limit?

MCPS does mixed ability for all ages until high school except for in Math.

Are you okay with cohorting (is that a made-up MCPS word?) 3rd graders? I am. Some third graders read very well and some don’t. As long as the groups are fluid, it’s fine.

Instead, my 3rd grader is stuck in a class where her reading group barely ever meets. The teacher is too busy working with the kids who are below level. SO MUCH wasted time.

Put yourself in the shoes of a parent whose kid of in the bottom group and as a result feels that at 7 they have already failed in life. Would you still advocate for this attach that stigmatizes kids so young?

.

It isn't the kids that do this. It is parents like you. If you really wanted to help your child you would want them in smaller environment with kids similar to him with extra teacher and para support so they can actually improve and learn and get up to the grade standards quickly.

What you want to do is throw the struggling kids in with everyone so not to stigmatize them, but yet you are stunting them. Protecting them by making them look average but keep them far below average because they aren't getting enough help. And they see kids in their class succeeding easily. They see them barely in groups, getting done their busy work in 5 minutes what takes them the entire group break to do and if not, they see the teacher ask smart Joey to help them learn the work which is so humiliating. Joey rolls his eyes because he just wants to read his book at his desk. So instead they usually just quickly get done the work, throw it in the bin and not learn anything. Teacher is too overwhelmed to look over and realize how much kid is struggling. And each year kids like this slip through the cracks over and over again, but at least they weren't stigmatized. We just teach them to expect less, work average, and get more.

I agree with this 100%

Mixing the kids helps No one and wastes so much time.

There have been so many actual studies done on this, but okay...some random DCUM poster says it wastes time,so it must be true! It really comes down to teacher preference. Teachers know how their students work together in the classroom better than anyone else and understand what works and what doesn't. It's up to them how they do small groups because they understand what unique needs their students have. There is no blanket, uniform, correct answer here..but DCUM gonna DCUM.

You might have a point if not for the dismal reading test scores year after year that reflect poor teaching.

Ahh yes, it’s all the teachers fault. Parents have no responsibility for their own kids, my bad.

Newsflash, most of the kids at the bottom have home issues, single parent, no to low income, trauma, learning disabilities, and even a loving parent may be working 2 jobs to put food on the table. They don’t have the luxury of tutors or even a hour to work with them. Some parents can no longer help with homework by grade 2. That is why having a class size of 15-20 for the bottom of the class would work so much better. Get a para, really work with them. Stop leaving them in mixed classes of 30 kids struggling and fake it until they make it.

How is that a newsflash? It’s definitely not. Actually super sad that people continue to have children they know they cannot support (and I don’t mean financially). Parenting is a lot more than birthing a kid and then throwing them to the school systems to do the heavy lifting for you and then be shocked we schools don’t have the resources to help your kid.

Naw, I think the shock comes when you realize that some schools actually do have the resources to help kids, but they all happen to be located in rich, white neighborhoods.

Naw. How many rich, white neighborhoods are left in Montgomery County?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if there was a way to just get a list of all MCPS schools rather than having to look up one at a time.

Use this page: https://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/SchoolsList/Index?l=15

OK, fine. Here they are

School Total Earned Points
Whitman 83.6
Churchill 82.8
Wootton 80.4
BCC 76.2
Walter Johnson 76
Richard Montgomery 70.4
Poolesville 69.7
Sherwood 68.8
Northwest 68
Clarksburg 66.9
Damascus 66.3
Quince Orchard 65.7
Rockville 65.3
Einstein 63.9
Blair 63.2
Magruder 62.1
Wheaton 61.6
Springbrook 61.6
Blake 61.1
Paint Branch 59.2
Seneca Valley 58.3
Northwood 55.8
Gaithersburg 53
Watkins Mill 52.2
Kennedy 49.2

Pretty close to the reverse of a FARMS rate-sorted list. So neither surprising nor meaningful.

+1 Almost to the exact order of lowest to highest FARMS. I mean, you could've just listed the FARMs rate and not bother looking at MSDE.

I think the FARMS rate is highly correlated with English Language Learners. There are several different metrics that take a hit because of ELLs. When this new rating system came out I was pretty disgusted, because it’s effectively useless the way it is set-up. Pull all data for ELLs into their own category for 4 years after arriving in US. Leave the main categories with only data from kids who speak English, so those comparisons are more meaningful.

But then you would know exactly how many undocumented students are in your schools being funded by MoCo taxpayers instead of their home countries. Dems cannot let you know that.

A) Not all ELLs are undocumented;

B) Every single At a Glance document for every single school in MCPS shows you the number of kids receiving ESOL services;

C) The report card does the same thing.

And no one is so simple to think that they are. But it is undeniable that MCPS has had a large and growing undocumented population for years, and that the population places a tremendous strain on resources. Don't try to negate people's concerns with simplistic arguments.

So long as there are immigrant children of any sort, MCPS will (and legally must) educate them.

Perhaps those who don't want immigrants can work to help keep other countries in better shape so there are fewer refugees of all sorts.

Not the PP but I have no issue with educating immigrants. This is a very transient area. The issue comes down to integrating classes and the whole PC version of keeping kids mixed in color, sex, and abilities. MCPS needs to let this go because no one is learning this way. The top reading groups never meet and the bottom groups meet more but not enough for them to ever catch up.

In 1st grade if there are 100 kids and 4 classes in an ES and right now MCPS has 4 classes of 25 kids each of varying levels and pulling off in groups.

Why not put the bottom 20 in one class with a teacher and a para.
Put the two middle classes with 25 kids and they share a para
Top class has 30 kids and no para

Change them for math levels in afternoon - similar levels.

I just don't understand the mixed groupings at all. The kids struggling are embarrassed and act out, don't care, or are too quiet. The kids that are smarter never meet in their groups, are always bored, can act out, and many times are used by exhausted teachers, as mini helpers to other kids struggling - embarrassing both. There is rarely ever full education going on. Just groups and busy work. I have volunteered in enough classes in ES before and after common/integrated classrooms to see that it is a failure.

I don’t think you’ve volunteered in that many classrooms if you think this is the solution. You have a way oversimplified view of children and learning. I fully believe in cohorting older students, but no, you don’t do what you’ve proposed with six year olds.

DP

What is your age limit?

MCPS does mixed ability for all ages until high school except for in Math.

Are you okay with cohorting (is that a made-up MCPS word?) 3rd graders? I am. Some third graders read very well and some don’t. As long as the groups are fluid, it’s fine.

Instead, my 3rd grader is stuck in a class where her reading group barely ever meets. The teacher is too busy working with the kids who are below level. SO MUCH wasted time.

Put yourself in the shoes of a parent whose kid of in the bottom group and as a result feels that at 7 they have already failed in life. Would you still advocate for this attach that stigmatizes kids so young?

.

It isn't the kids that do this. It is parents like you. If you really wanted to help your child you would want them in smaller environment with kids similar to him with extra teacher and para support so they can actually improve and learn and get up to the grade standards quickly.

What you want to do is throw the struggling kids in with everyone so not to stigmatize them, but yet you are stunting them. Protecting them by making them look average but keep them far below average because they aren't getting enough help. And they see kids in their class succeeding easily. They see them barely in groups, getting done their busy work in 5 minutes what takes them the entire group break to do and if not, they see the teacher ask smart Joey to help them learn the work which is so humiliating. Joey rolls his eyes because he just wants to read his book at his desk. So instead they usually just quickly get done the work, throw it in the bin and not learn anything. Teacher is too overwhelmed to look over and realize how much kid is struggling. And each year kids like this slip through the cracks over and over again, but at least they weren't stigmatized. We just teach them to expect less, work average, and get more.

I agree with this 100%

Mixing the kids helps No one and wastes so much time.

There have been so many actual studies done on this, but okay...some random DCUM poster says it wastes time,so it must be true! It really comes down to teacher preference. Teachers know how their students work together in the classroom better than anyone else and understand what works and what doesn't. It's up to them how they do small groups because they understand what unique needs their students have. There is no blanket, uniform, correct answer here..but DCUM gonna DCUM.

You might have a point if not for the dismal reading test scores year after year that reflect poor teaching.

Ahh yes, it’s all the teachers fault. Parents have no responsibility for their own kids, my bad.

Newsflash, most of the kids at the bottom have home issues, single parent, no to low income, trauma, learning disabilities, and even a loving parent may be working 2 jobs to put food on the table. They don’t have the luxury of tutors or even a hour to work with them. Some parents can no longer help with homework by grade 2. That is why having a class size of 15-20 for the bottom of the class would work so much better. Get a para, really work with them. Stop leaving them in mixed classes of 30 kids struggling and fake it until they make it.

This!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if there was a way to just get a list of all MCPS schools rather than having to look up one at a time.

Use this page: https://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/SchoolsList/Index?l=15

OK, fine. Here they are

School Total Earned Points
Whitman 83.6
Churchill 82.8
Wootton 80.4
BCC 76.2
Walter Johnson 76
Richard Montgomery 70.4
Poolesville 69.7
Sherwood 68.8
Northwest 68
Clarksburg 66.9
Damascus 66.3
Quince Orchard 65.7
Rockville 65.3
Einstein 63.9
Blair 63.2
Magruder 62.1
Wheaton 61.6
Springbrook 61.6
Blake 61.1
Paint Branch 59.2
Seneca Valley 58.3
Northwood 55.8
Gaithersburg 53
Watkins Mill 52.2
Kennedy 49.2

Pretty close to the reverse of a FARMS rate-sorted list. So neither surprising nor meaningful.

+1 Almost to the exact order of lowest to highest FARMS. I mean, you could've just listed the FARMs rate and not bother looking at MSDE.

I think the FARMS rate is highly correlated with English Language Learners. There are several different metrics that take a hit because of ELLs. When this new rating system came out I was pretty disgusted, because it’s effectively useless the way it is set-up. Pull all data for ELLs into their own category for 4 years after arriving in US. Leave the main categories with only data from kids who speak English, so those comparisons are more meaningful.

But then you would know exactly how many undocumented students are in your schools being funded by MoCo taxpayers instead of their home countries. Dems cannot let you know that.

A) Not all ELLs are undocumented;

B) Every single At a Glance document for every single school in MCPS shows you the number of kids receiving ESOL services;

C) The report card does the same thing.

And no one is so simple to think that they are. But it is undeniable that MCPS has had a large and growing undocumented population for years, and that the population places a tremendous strain on resources. Don't try to negate people's concerns with simplistic arguments.

So long as there are immigrant children of any sort, MCPS will (and legally must) educate them.

Perhaps those who don't want immigrants can work to help keep other countries in better shape so there are fewer refugees of all sorts.

Not the PP but I have no issue with educating immigrants. This is a very transient area. The issue comes down to integrating classes and the whole PC version of keeping kids mixed in color, sex, and abilities. MCPS needs to let this go because no one is learning this way. The top reading groups never meet and the bottom groups meet more but not enough for them to ever catch up.

In 1st grade if there are 100 kids and 4 classes in an ES and right now MCPS has 4 classes of 25 kids each of varying levels and pulling off in groups.

Why not put the bottom 20 in one class with a teacher and a para.
Put the two middle classes with 25 kids and they share a para
Top class has 30 kids and no para

Change them for math levels in afternoon - similar levels.

I just don't understand the mixed groupings at all. The kids struggling are embarrassed and act out, don't care, or are too quiet. The kids that are smarter never meet in their groups, are always bored, can act out, and many times are used by exhausted teachers, as mini helpers to other kids struggling - embarrassing both. There is rarely ever full education going on. Just groups and busy work. I have volunteered in enough classes in ES before and after common/integrated classrooms to see that it is a failure.

I don’t think you’ve volunteered in that many classrooms if you think this is the solution. You have a way oversimplified view of children and learning. I fully believe in cohorting older students, but no, you don’t do what you’ve proposed with six year olds.

DP

What is your age limit?

MCPS does mixed ability for all ages until high school except for in Math.

Are you okay with cohorting (is that a made-up MCPS word?) 3rd graders? I am. Some third graders read very well and some don’t. As long as the groups are fluid, it’s fine.

Instead, my 3rd grader is stuck in a class where her reading group barely ever meets. The teacher is too busy working with the kids who are below level. SO MUCH wasted time.

Put yourself in the shoes of a parent whose kid of in the bottom group and as a result feels that at 7 they have already failed in life. Would you still advocate for this attach that stigmatizes kids so young?

.

It isn't the kids that do this. It is parents like you. If you really wanted to help your child you would want them in smaller environment with kids similar to him with extra teacher and para support so they can actually improve and learn and get up to the grade standards quickly.

What you want to do is throw the struggling kids in with everyone so not to stigmatize them, but yet you are stunting them. Protecting them by making them look average but keep them far below average because they aren't getting enough help. And they see kids in their class succeeding easily. They see them barely in groups, getting done their busy work in 5 minutes what takes them the entire group break to do and if not, they see the teacher ask smart Joey to help them learn the work which is so humiliating. Joey rolls his eyes because he just wants to read his book at his desk. So instead they usually just quickly get done the work, throw it in the bin and not learn anything. Teacher is too overwhelmed to look over and realize how much kid is struggling. And each year kids like this slip through the cracks over and over again, but at least they weren't stigmatized. We just teach them to expect less, work average, and get more.

I agree with this 100%

Mixing the kids helps No one and wastes so much time.

There have been so many actual studies done on this, but okay...some random DCUM poster says it wastes time,so it must be true! It really comes down to teacher preference. Teachers know how their students work together in the classroom better than anyone else and understand what works and what doesn't. It's up to them how they do small groups because they understand what unique needs their students have. There is no blanket, uniform, correct answer here..but DCUM gonna DCUM.

You might have a point if not for the dismal reading test scores year after year that reflect poor teaching.

Ahh yes, it’s all the teachers fault. Parents have no responsibility for their own kids, my bad.

Newsflash, most of the kids at the bottom have home issues, single parent, no to low income, trauma, learning disabilities, and even a loving parent may be working 2 jobs to put food on the table. They don’t have the luxury of tutors or even a hour to work with them. Some parents can no longer help with homework by grade 2. That is why having a class size of 15-20 for the bottom of the class would work so much better. Get a para, really work with them. Stop leaving them in mixed classes of 30 kids struggling and fake it until they make it.

This!!

Except to do this the on level classes would have to get bigger and bigger or there would be more of them which would result in more and more portable classrooms. I do agree about giving all the classes, especially K-2 a co-teacher or Para.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if there was a way to just get a list of all MCPS schools rather than having to look up one at a time.

Use this page: https://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/SchoolsList/Index?l=15

OK, fine. Here they are

School Total Earned Points
Whitman 83.6
Churchill 82.8
Wootton 80.4
BCC 76.2
Walter Johnson 76
Richard Montgomery 70.4
Poolesville 69.7
Sherwood 68.8
Northwest 68
Clarksburg 66.9
Damascus 66.3
Quince Orchard 65.7
Rockville 65.3
Einstein 63.9
Blair 63.2
Magruder 62.1
Wheaton 61.6
Springbrook 61.6
Blake 61.1
Paint Branch 59.2
Seneca Valley 58.3
Northwood 55.8
Gaithersburg 53
Watkins Mill 52.2
Kennedy 49.2

Pretty close to the reverse of a FARMS rate-sorted list. So neither surprising nor meaningful.

+1 Almost to the exact order of lowest to highest FARMS. I mean, you could've just listed the FARMs rate and not bother looking at MSDE.

I think the FARMS rate is highly correlated with English Language Learners. There are several different metrics that take a hit because of ELLs. When this new rating system came out I was pretty disgusted, because it’s effectively useless the way it is set-up. Pull all data for ELLs into their own category for 4 years after arriving in US. Leave the main categories with only data from kids who speak English, so those comparisons are more meaningful.

But then you would know exactly how many undocumented students are in your schools being funded by MoCo taxpayers instead of their home countries. Dems cannot let you know that.

A) Not all ELLs are undocumented;

B) Every single At a Glance document for every single school in MCPS shows you the number of kids receiving ESOL services;

C) The report card does the same thing.

And no one is so simple to think that they are. But it is undeniable that MCPS has had a large and growing undocumented population for years, and that the population places a tremendous strain on resources. Don't try to negate people's concerns with simplistic arguments.

So long as there are immigrant children of any sort, MCPS will (and legally must) educate them.

Perhaps those who don't want immigrants can work to help keep other countries in better shape so there are fewer refugees of all sorts.

Not the PP but I have no issue with educating immigrants. This is a very transient area. The issue comes down to integrating classes and the whole PC version of keeping kids mixed in color, sex, and abilities. MCPS needs to let this go because no one is learning this way. The top reading groups never meet and the bottom groups meet more but not enough for them to ever catch up.

In 1st grade if there are 100 kids and 4 classes in an ES and right now MCPS has 4 classes of 25 kids each of varying levels and pulling off in groups.

Why not put the bottom 20 in one class with a teacher and a para.
Put the two middle classes with 25 kids and they share a para
Top class has 30 kids and no para

Change them for math levels in afternoon - similar levels.

I just don't understand the mixed groupings at all. The kids struggling are embarrassed and act out, don't care, or are too quiet. The kids that are smarter never meet in their groups, are always bored, can act out, and many times are used by exhausted teachers, as mini helpers to other kids struggling - embarrassing both. There is rarely ever full education going on. Just groups and busy work. I have volunteered in enough classes in ES before and after common/integrated classrooms to see that it is a failure.

I don’t think you’ve volunteered in that many classrooms if you think this is the solution. You have a way oversimplified view of children and learning. I fully believe in cohorting older students, but no, you don’t do what you’ve proposed with six year olds.

DP

What is your age limit?

MCPS does mixed ability for all ages until high school except for in Math.

Are you okay with cohorting (is that a made-up MCPS word?) 3rd graders? I am. Some third graders read very well and some don’t. As long as the groups are fluid, it’s fine.

Instead, my 3rd grader is stuck in a class where her reading group barely ever meets. The teacher is too busy working with the kids who are below level. SO MUCH wasted time.

Put yourself in the shoes of a parent whose kid of in the bottom group and as a result feels that at 7 they have already failed in life. Would you still advocate for this attach that stigmatizes kids so young?

.

It isn't the kids that do this. It is parents like you. If you really wanted to help your child you would want them in smaller environment with kids similar to him with extra teacher and para support so they can actually improve and learn and get up to the grade standards quickly.

What you want to do is throw the struggling kids in with everyone so not to stigmatize them, but yet you are stunting them. Protecting them by making them look average but keep them far below average because they aren't getting enough help. And they see kids in their class succeeding easily. They see them barely in groups, getting done their busy work in 5 minutes what takes them the entire group break to do and if not, they see the teacher ask smart Joey to help them learn the work which is so humiliating. Joey rolls his eyes because he just wants to read his book at his desk. So instead they usually just quickly get done the work, throw it in the bin and not learn anything. Teacher is too overwhelmed to look over and realize how much kid is struggling. And each year kids like this slip through the cracks over and over again, but at least they weren't stigmatized. We just teach them to expect less, work average, and get more.

I agree with this 100%

Mixing the kids helps No one and wastes so much time.

There have been so many actual studies done on this, but okay...some random DCUM poster says it wastes time,so it must be true! It really comes down to teacher preference. Teachers know how their students work together in the classroom better than anyone else and understand what works and what doesn't. It's up to them how they do small groups because they understand what unique needs their students have. There is no blanket, uniform, correct answer here..but DCUM gonna DCUM.

You might have a point if not for the dismal reading test scores year after year that reflect poor teaching.

Ahh yes, it’s all the teachers fault. Parents have no responsibility for their own kids, my bad.

Newsflash, most of the kids at the bottom have home issues, single parent, no to low income, trauma, learning disabilities, and even a loving parent may be working 2 jobs to put food on the table. They don’t have the luxury of tutors or even a hour to work with them. Some parents can no longer help with homework by grade 2. That is why having a class size of 15-20 for the bottom of the class would work so much better. Get a para, really work with them. Stop leaving them in mixed classes of 30 kids struggling and fake it until they make it.

How is that a newsflash? It’s definitely not. Actually super sad that people continue to have children they know they cannot support (and I don’t mean financially). Parenting is a lot more than birthing a kid and then throwing them to the school systems to do the heavy lifting for you and then be shocked we schools don’t have the resources to help your kid.

Naw, I think the shock comes when you realize that some schools actually do have the resources to help kids, but they all happen to be located in rich, white neighborhoods.

Naw. How many rich, white neighborhoods are left in Montgomery County?

Spend some time in Bethesda and Potomac. You’ll see plenty.