Lauren Boebert alleged to have had 2 abortions, worked as an escort

[Anonymous]

She can absolutely file a defamation lawsuit against Muckrakers if this is a false accusation. This would be a big payday for her and lord knows that she & her dirtbag husband need the money.

Let's see if she sues. I bet she won't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ahhhh


The hypocrisy.


It's OK when the left slut shames. Meanwhile, they tell everyone else we to tolerate pornstar teachers and run #metoo campaigns.

So astounding the Dems would stoop this low to slut shame women they don't agree with.

They aren't slut shaming her. They are going after her hypocrisy.

Nope. You people are misogynistic ghouls who find it perfectly acceptable to call her a “trashy trollop” and “Christian skank.” And then have the gall to deny it.
DP

Wow wow wow. Really? Such gaslighting and hypocrisy to have right wingers like you who have a long long long history of misogyny pretending to care and be concerned about this. To whine about things like "slut shaming" when the literal ENTIRETY of conservative culture is based on conforming to norms and attacking those who don't. You've taken up a completely disingenuous and non-believable strategy of faux, performative outrage for no real reason other than to indefensibly mount a lame attempt to defend Lauren Boebert, who, even if this is untrue (and there's a chance elements of it are in fact true), is still an extremely shitty person for a hundred other reasons. Just go sit down and do some self examination, will you?

Sorry, no can do. You’re being called out on your misogyny. It is YOU who needs to sit down and do some self examination. And don’t whine (as usual) when someone makes a negative comment about one of the darlings on the left. You have no more cards to play.

BUUUUULLLL SHITTTTTT. You right wingers don't give a single care about misogyny. THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE FACT!

Take your pathetic faux outrage to the trash heap at the curb where it belongs.

I’ll be trotting out that line the next time you screech about “racism/sexism” when a female Democrat is (correctly) criticized for her idiocy. Looking forward to it! Have a better day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ahhhh


The hypocrisy.


It's OK when the left slut shames. Meanwhile, they tell everyone else we to tolerate pornstar teachers and run #metoo campaigns.

So astounding the Dems would stoop this low to slut shame women they don't agree with.

They aren't slut shaming her. They are going after her hypocrisy.

Nope. You people are misogynistic ghouls who find it perfectly acceptable to call her a “trashy trollop” and “Christian skank.” And then have the gall to deny it.
DP

Wow wow wow. Really? Such gaslighting and hypocrisy to have right wingers like you who have a long long long history of misogyny pretending to care and be concerned about this. To whine about things like "slut shaming" when the literal ENTIRETY of conservative culture is based on conforming to norms and attacking those who don't. You've taken up a completely disingenuous and non-believable strategy of faux, performative outrage for no real reason other than to indefensibly mount a lame attempt to defend Lauren Boebert, who, even if this is untrue (and there's a chance elements of it are in fact true), is still an extremely shitty person for a hundred other reasons. Just go sit down and do some self examination, will you?

Sorry, no can do. You’re being called out on your misogyny. It is YOU who needs to sit down and do some self examination. And don’t whine (as usual) when someone makes a negative comment about one of the darlings on the left. You have no more cards to play.

^ also missed the fact that Muckrakers was co-founded by never-Trumper conservatives. But sure, blame "the left"

^ missed the fact that I’m referring to DCUM’s finest, whose heads explode whenever AOC, Nancy Pelosi, HRC - really any Dem woman at all- are criticized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ahhhh


The hypocrisy.


It's OK when the left slut shames. Meanwhile, they tell everyone else we to tolerate pornstar teachers and run #metoo campaigns.

So astounding the Dems would stoop this low to slut shame women they don't agree with.

They aren't slut shaming her. They are going after her hypocrisy.

Nope. You people are misogynistic ghouls who find it perfectly acceptable to call her a “trashy trollop” and “Christian skank.” And then have the gall to deny it.
DP

Wow wow wow. Really? Such gaslighting and hypocrisy to have right wingers like you who have a long long long history of misogyny pretending to care and be concerned about this. To whine about things like "slut shaming" when the literal ENTIRETY of conservative culture is based on conforming to norms and attacking those who don't. You've taken up a completely disingenuous and non-believable strategy of faux, performative outrage for no real reason other than to indefensibly mount a lame attempt to defend Lauren Boebert, who, even if this is untrue (and there's a chance elements of it are in fact true), is still an extremely shitty person for a hundred other reasons. Just go sit down and do some self examination, will you?

Sorry, no can do. You’re being called out on your misogyny. It is YOU who needs to sit down and do some self examination. And don’t whine (as usual) when someone makes a negative comment about one of the darlings on the left. You have no more cards to play.

I guess the thing is I don't care if THIS is the thing that gets you clutching your pearls.

There's no real pearl clutching. PP is a pathetic, desperate phony, suddenly pretending to care about "misogyny" and "hypocrisy" and "slut shaming" when her side is the leading purveyor of those very things. That's all she has - performative pretense at caring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She can absolutely file a defamation lawsuit against Muckrakers if this is a false accusation. This would be a big payday for her and lord knows that she & her dirtbag husband need the money.

Let's see if she sues. I bet she won't.

She won't. That will open up discovery which would expose even more of her problems.

But let's say that even if she did file a defamation suit and somehow won, it would probably still be no better than the Covington kid who only got a small nuisance settlement and couldn't even get a public admission of wrongdoing or apology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ahhhh


The hypocrisy.


It's OK when the left slut shames. Meanwhile, they tell everyone else we to tolerate pornstar teachers and run #metoo campaigns.

So astounding the Dems would stoop this low to slut shame women they don't agree with.

They aren't slut shaming her. They are going after her hypocrisy.

Nope. You people are misogynistic ghouls who find it perfectly acceptable to call her a “trashy trollop” and “Christian skank.” And then have the gall to deny it.
DP

Wow wow wow. Really? Such gaslighting and hypocrisy to have right wingers like you who have a long long long history of misogyny pretending to care and be concerned about this. To whine about things like "slut shaming" when the literal ENTIRETY of conservative culture is based on conforming to norms and attacking those who don't. You've taken up a completely disingenuous and non-believable strategy of faux, performative outrage for no real reason other than to indefensibly mount a lame attempt to defend Lauren Boebert, who, even if this is untrue (and there's a chance elements of it are in fact true), is still an extremely shitty person for a hundred other reasons. Just go sit down and do some self examination, will you?

Sorry, no can do. You’re being called out on your misogyny. It is YOU who needs to sit down and do some self examination. And don’t whine (as usual) when someone makes a negative comment about one of the darlings on the left. You have no more cards to play.

I guess the thing is I don't care if THIS is the thing that gets you clutching your pearls.

There's no real pearl clutching. PP is a pathetic, desperate phony, suddenly pretending to care about "misogyny" and "hypocrisy" and "slut shaming" when her side is the leading purveyor of those very things. That's all she has - performative pretense at caring.

Wow - that’s some spectacular projection! Bravo!

[Anonymous]

The hypocrisy on this board is amazing... story debunked yet we are approaching 10 plus pages. Meanwhile if I started the same type of thread and replaced LB with AOC the Overlord would delete before it reached page 2.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The hypocrisy on this board is amazing... story debunked yet we are approaching 10 plus pages. Meanwhile if I started the same type of thread and replaced LB with AOC the Overlord would delete before it reached page 2.

Can you show me where the story was definitively debunked?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ahhhh


The hypocrisy.


It's OK when the left slut shames. Meanwhile, they tell everyone else we to tolerate pornstar teachers and run #metoo campaigns.

So astounding the Dems would stoop this low to slut shame women they don't agree with.

They aren't slut shaming her. They are going after her hypocrisy.

Nope. You people are misogynistic ghouls who find it perfectly acceptable to call her a “trashy trollop” and “Christian skank.” And then have the gall to deny it.
DP

Wow wow wow. Really? Such gaslighting and hypocrisy to have right wingers like you who have a long long long history of misogyny pretending to care and be concerned about this. To whine about things like "slut shaming" when the literal ENTIRETY of conservative culture is based on conforming to norms and attacking those who don't. You've taken up a completely disingenuous and non-believable strategy of faux, performative outrage for no real reason other than to indefensibly mount a lame attempt to defend Lauren Boebert, who, even if this is untrue (and there's a chance elements of it are in fact true), is still an extremely shitty person for a hundred other reasons. Just go sit down and do some self examination, will you?

Sorry, no can do. You’re being called out on your misogyny. It is YOU who needs to sit down and do some self examination. And don’t whine (as usual) when someone makes a negative comment about one of the darlings on the left. You have no more cards to play.

BUUUUULLLL SHITTTTTT. You right wingers don't give a single care about misogyny. THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE FACT!

Take your pathetic faux outrage to the trash heap at the curb where it belongs.

I’ll be trotting out that line the next time you screech about “racism/sexism” when a female Democrat is (correctly) criticized for her idiocy. Looking forward to it! Have a better day.

I mean - honestly, that was your response before. We've heard it all from you already. I don't think you have anything new to say, mah buddy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ahhhh


The hypocrisy.


It's OK when the left slut shames. Meanwhile, they tell everyone else we to tolerate pornstar teachers and run #metoo campaigns.

So astounding the Dems would stoop this low to slut shame women they don't agree with.

They aren't slut shaming her. They are going after her hypocrisy.

Nope. You people are misogynistic ghouls who find it perfectly acceptable to call her a “trashy trollop” and “Christian skank.” And then have the gall to deny it.
DP

Wow wow wow. Really? Such gaslighting and hypocrisy to have right wingers like you who have a long long long history of misogyny pretending to care and be concerned about this. To whine about things like "slut shaming" when the literal ENTIRETY of conservative culture is based on conforming to norms and attacking those who don't. You've taken up a completely disingenuous and non-believable strategy of faux, performative outrage for no real reason other than to indefensibly mount a lame attempt to defend Lauren Boebert, who, even if this is untrue (and there's a chance elements of it are in fact true), is still an extremely shitty person for a hundred other reasons. Just go sit down and do some self examination, will you?

Sorry, no can do. You’re being called out on your misogyny. It is YOU who needs to sit down and do some self examination. And don’t whine (as usual) when someone makes a negative comment about one of the darlings on the left. You have no more cards to play.

I guess the thing is I don't care if THIS is the thing that gets you clutching your pearls.

There's no real pearl clutching. PP is a pathetic, desperate phony, suddenly pretending to care about "misogyny" and "hypocrisy" and "slut shaming" when her side is the leading purveyor of those very things. That's all she has - performative pretense at caring.

Again: what's the difference if this is what you think? Pearls clutched. Yes, got it.

But again again - this isn't aimed at us, anyway. It's aimed at R voters. That's who the Cawthorne stuff was aimed at, too. Ds may take an unseemly delight - and, count me among them! - but ultimately we thought she was a garbage person who never should have been in office already. We didn't need her to have been an escort who got lots of abortions to want her gone. We're not the audience, even if we're off int he sidelines hoping that maybe this could be the thing that gets Rs more exercised about her. See what else comes out and what it does to Republicans. Democrats don't matter here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hypocrisy on this board is amazing... story debunked yet we are approaching 10 plus pages. Meanwhile if I started the same type of thread and replaced LB with AOC the Overlord would delete before it reached page 2.

Can you show me where the story was definitively debunked?

No, because the story has not been debunked. This is another example of RWNJs believing what they want to believe, and trying to impose their beliefs on everyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ahhhh


The hypocrisy.


It's OK when the left slut shames. Meanwhile, they tell everyone else we to tolerate pornstar teachers and run #metoo campaigns.

So astounding the Dems would stoop this low to slut shame women they don't agree with.

They aren't slut shaming her. They are going after her hypocrisy.

Nope. You people are misogynistic ghouls who find it perfectly acceptable to call her a “trashy trollop” and “Christian skank.” And then have the gall to deny it.
DP

Wow wow wow. Really? Such gaslighting and hypocrisy to have right wingers like you who have a long long long history of misogyny pretending to care and be concerned about this. To whine about things like "slut shaming" when the literal ENTIRETY of conservative culture is based on conforming to norms and attacking those who don't. You've taken up a completely disingenuous and non-believable strategy of faux, performative outrage for no real reason other than to indefensibly mount a lame attempt to defend Lauren Boebert, who, even if this is untrue (and there's a chance elements of it are in fact true), is still an extremely shitty person for a hundred other reasons. Just go sit down and do some self examination, will you?

Sorry, no can do. You’re being called out on your misogyny. It is YOU who needs to sit down and do some self examination. And don’t whine (as usual) when someone makes a negative comment about one of the darlings on the left. You have no more cards to play.

^ also missed the fact that Muckrakers was co-founded by never-Trumper conservatives. But sure, blame "the left"

^ missed the fact that I’m referring to DCUM’s finest, whose heads explode whenever AOC, Nancy Pelosi, HRC - really any Dem woman at all- are criticized.

When you criticize AOC, Pelosi and HRC you cannot keep yourselves from doing so through a sexist and misogynist lens. No one is using that lens to judge Boebert. Do you think it’s acceptable to pray for the President to die? Sorry, I forget that you’re from the party of “let’s go Brandon,” so you don’t have a rational attachment to the world anymore.

Lauren Boebert married a man who exposed his penis to underage children, a sexual crime. She appears to have been involved with the insurrection. She wished death upon Biden. She claims to stand for family values and forced birth, but it appears that there’s a chance that she herself chooses neither. This is all up for legitimate debate.

And no one believes that you care about misogyny. Not even you.

[Anonymous]

We all know these are crude rumors that respectable journalists are not touching with a ten foot pole until they have solid evidence.

We all know that had the shoe been on the other foot, this thread would be locked by now.

Why is it still up?

Because Boebert is a hypocrite. The current swathe of younger female Democrats may have had abortions and worked as escorts, but they did not campaign to end abortion and do not belong to the sex-repressed party.

This is about moral hypocrisy, not abortion or lifestyle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Repeat if you think it sounds true”. Occupy Democrats. Such standards!

+1
I’ve reported this thread but it’s still up - and my comments calling this out as fake were deleted. Not a Boebert or MTG fan, but no one should have lies like this spread about them. Curious that this garbage is allowed to stand.

Hasn't been disproven. The word of a Trumpster means nothing - just think of all of the things Trump claimed were "fake news" but turned out to be true.

This hyper-liberal site says otherwise.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/liberals-rush-to-spread-bogus-lauren-boebert-escort-and-abortion-rumors

Whoa whoa whoa. This doesn't at all debunk the Muckrakers release. The only so-called "debunking" anyone has tried to do is to point at some photos of drunk Guiliani "stop the steal" star witness Melissa Carone from ExploreTalent.com and say "see, that's Melissa Carone, not Lauren Boebert!" - except Muckrakers never even sent that Melissa Carone picture in the first place. Meanwhile this is *definitely* Boebert, same picture on both the Sugardaddymeet.com site and from Boebert's Exploretalent.com profile.



No glasses and hair dyed blond from the time that the story dates to, but it's definitely Little Miss Shooters Grille

Those jeans and visible thong are so 2001

I think that's a tramp stamp, not a visible thong. To go with the weird collection of tattoos to include a cross ("see, I'm a christian skank!")

Good catch. I'm old enough to remember when those jeans were in style, which explains why my eyesight is so poor. She's serving early 2000's meth head vibes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ahhhh


The hypocrisy.


It's OK when the left slut shames. Meanwhile, they tell everyone else we to tolerate pornstar teachers and run #metoo campaigns.

So astounding the Dems would stoop this low to slut shame women they don't agree with.

The left did NOT release this. This isn't to kill her with Democrats, Democrats hate her, this is Republicans eating their own. I am a liberal and am disgusted that they would do this to her!