So you’re admitting that rich people are lazy and work very little? Thank you for confirming what I already knew. |
I’m guessing you work in either tech or finance at an executive level. That salary is extremely rare from a W2 income |
What? At 28 I was dating and living a bohemiam life moving from city to city. I had no idea how much freaking $$$$ I would need for a very basic lifestyle of reasonable commute, decent schools, and kids in boring SFH. |
Just because you couldn’t manage to grow up doesn’t mean everyone else can’t. You do understand that this nomadic lifestyle where you wait until your like 35 to procreate isn’t making urban women any happier, correct? |
DP: It sure made me happy to have a nomadic, fun life in my 20s in different cities throughout the world. I love caring for my kids now, and having had a steady job and living a fairly sedate domestic life in my late 30s and 40s, but I wouldn't give up my 20s and all I experienced then for anything. I think the timing was perfect for me--personally, financially--and I'm a better parent for it. I have lots of rich memories which I get to enjoy many times over rather than waiting to do those things when I'm retired. |
This reminds me that a big part of the divide can be how soon you got married and had kids. Big difference in your early 40s between a couple with kids in middle school who bought a house 15 years ago and a couple in the thick of the hugely expensive nanny-or-double-daycare years squished into a condo because neither of them ever wanted a house until five years ago. |
I agree with what you’re saying, but I thought you were going to talk about the divide between parents/families that had kid(s) too young and never recovered financially or socially. I know too many folks who ended up with a kid at 24 or earlier and just can’t catch a break. |
I was saving money, I just had no idea how much things cost when I entered the next phase. My parents house is worth $70k. Today. |
They still do, just not here. |
+1, this is totally fair. I am one of those women who got married and had kids later in life (late 30s), and even though many of my friends had kids before me, I didn't fully understand how much things cost (houses in a good school district, or if not, private school; FT nanny, etc.) Now I do get it and am shifting my career accordingly (left Feds for private sector job). |
Same. I'm 40 and I've seen this go both ways. I have a few friends who remained active in their faith and they married and had kids young. They have been stay at home moms since college, so no child care costs. One married a police officer, and they bought their first home at ~ 23 and traded up twice. They live in a nice home now. Their kids are older teenagers now, and she just recently started a career because she can. I don't think they have a ton of money saved for their kids' college or retirement, but they have a pretty nice house with a pretty small mortgage, and he'll have a police pension. They're planning various fun trips over the next decade because they'll be empty nesters by ~45. On the other hand, most of my law school friends had kids in their late thirties, but we've all been saving since we graduated law school at 25yo. I still bought a house in my twenties, and because I had kids later, I was in a financial position to superfund their college funds. I don't get to take all the great trips in my 40s that my friend who had her kids really young will take because I have toddlers who don't travel well. I don't think either approach is superior. There are pros and cons. Sometimes I wish I had kids younger just so I could maximize my time on earth with them. |
PP here and I’ve definitely seen that with extended family in other parts of the country but not a lot in DC. |
Wow, do you really get bitter you can't just go and charter a jet? |
DH and I deliberately chose to be in group 2. The most important thing to us is to have time with the kids while they are growing up, to ensure that they are equipped to make the right decisions. We could have chosen group 3, but leaving then with a full-time nanny just scared me to death. |
+1 Yeah, on average it makes the most financial sense to have your kids late. You invest your extra capital early on, it grows and you're at your highest earning when the kids come and your nest egg is already growing well. Of course some people have life setbacks or don't plan well or whatever and this doesn't work out, but most often there are more financial benefits to waiting to have kids than having them early. Of course, fertility issues may arise, but that's a relatively low percent of people. There may be other reasons to have kids earlier (e.g., energy levels for kids and grandkids)--but finances usually aren't one of them. |