I guess what I said was not fully true, but they are not recommending masks at all in areas with low levels of community risk. Several news articles have also pointed out that this applies to schools and childcare centers, although the CDC website is mostly not updated except for this. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/covid-by-county.html |
I'm a parent, but this is my understanding too. That actually makes our decision to let our toddler go maskless easier now that our center has gone mask optional. If there had been different quarantine procedures associated with mask/no mask, it might have given us pause, but even the masked toddlers are considered maskless when it comes to applying quarantines. So I'm glad we now have the option not to participate in the charade! |
I guess the question is, how much of a charade is quarantine, when there is no contact tracing in the community? Do we know how common it is for kids or teachers to test positive after an exposure at daycare or preschool, and is it more common to test positive after a known exposure than just randomly, since there are so many unknown exposures? |
All of it is a charade. Most people catch COVID at home. It’s a highly contagious respiratory disease that almost everyone will be exposed to. |
Quarantine never made sense after there was a moderate number of cases in the community. It particularly never made sense for young kids, given the high incidence of asymptomatic cases. Quarantines are a ridiculously blunt instrument that do far more harm than good. Other kids in the classroom rarely test positive after an exposure. |
100% this. Notify parents when there's a case and allow them to keep their kids home for a few days if they want, but quarantines harm kids and families and they are really inappropriate at this stage in the pandemic. Keep sick kids home, let healthy kids go to school. |
Our MoCo daycare went mask optional earlier this week, which I was not expecting. I have never been comfortable with the guidance to mask kids in this age group, and don't see the usefulness in a group care setting where the kids primarily wearing cloth and are also eating and napping close together unmasked. But apparently I'm in the minority as my 3yo has been only one of two in their class to not wear a mask the last few days. DC even asked about it this morning. I guess I'll see how it goes the next week or two but if no one else is going to unmask their kids and my DC is uncommittable with it I'm not sure what we'll do.
I do wish the CDC would update their childcare webpage on this. |
Same at our daycare - it seems like a lot of folks are still masking their kids. I think DD can tell she is in the minority, but that doesn't seem to make her uncomfortable. There was already a boy not wearing one in her class before masks were optional for everyone (maybe special needs). DD seems very happy to not wear a mask, so we won't be masking her as long as we don't have to. |
The problem for the CDC is that quarantines are really their only way to coerce vaccinations, since mandates are hard to get through. Sure, there’s no pediatric vaccine to mandate right now, but once they acknowledge unvaccinated kids don’t need to quarantine they’re not going to be able to bring it back. |
IN DC (I can't speak to MD or VA) you can end a quarantine (for being a close contact) after testing negative on Day 5 - but days 6-10 when you return you should be in mask. so a young child whose never worn a mask might have a hard time keeping a mask on. 3s or 4s who are used to this will just pop a mask on and come on back. IN DC you can end isolation (after being positive for covid) with a negative antigen test on Day 5, return on day 6 BUT you must wear a mask when you return for days 6-10. So, yes, masks will still be around even when nobody is routinely wearing them with a Mask Optional policy. AND in DC indoor mask mandate will be tied to the CDC Community Levels - when DC returns to HIGH then the indoor mask mandate comes back. |
Our preschool just informed us that they will be insisting on masking until the under 5s are vaccine eligible, due to parental paranoia. |
Omg where is this? |
Yeah I think this is one of those things that has become so hard to undo once started. The original directive to not mask under 2 for safety reasons never should have evolved into you-must-mask-at-age-2. I’d like to think the people responsible for this would have paused had they known how long this would go on. Maybe not. Many areas never adopted toddler masking to begin with but those that did just can’t seem to let it go. |
Exactly. It's clear it's not about public health. It's like it's become part of some parents/preschools' identity. It struck me when we were visiting open houses for preschools that the way they talked about masking, they didn't talk about following public health guidance, they didn't say they'd stop masking when it was no longer recommended. They just said "we require masks, don't worry the children wear them better than adults! You should expect we'll require masks next year." |
Yes. I feel like I'm always mentioning that the WHO, UNICEF, the European CDC all recommend against masking children 5 and under but it's just an echo chamber for those who agree with me. 2+ is the norm here and many people aren't prepared to question it -- either you're pro-mask or you're anti-mask. I HOPE that if we can just get centers to drop toddler masking, by the time next winter rolls around and cases surge, perhaps there will be less of an appetite for it. I'm okay with masking older children through surges but not toddlers and preschoolers. |