Is Tucker Carlson a Russian agent?

[Anonymous]

This thread is group think in full force. We should be able to ask the question of whether some of these things are false flags or not without being called a “traitor”.

After all, the current Ukrainian regime and its Western support is no stranger to false flags — check out this study from the University of Ottawa.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2658245

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, Russia invaded a democratic country and is now probably committing atrocities,.and this is what the major anchor on FOX News has to say? Smh.

No. This is the problem with people like Joe Walsh. He crap tweets and people believe him. It is totally false.

No, it isn't. This is the problem with FOX viewers, they're disconnected from reality.

The people disconnected from reality are those who believe tweets from Joe Walsh.
The tweet he put out attributing a quote to Carlson is totally false. It is fake news.
And, even though it has been reported.... it is still up. Twitter has chosen to leave a false quote up with no warning label or anything.

And, you folks think Twitter is not biased.

The tweet was a paraphrase, everyone gets that, and everyone agrees it's accurate. When you're the only person in your lonely world gnashing your teeth about how big bad Joe Walsh and "biased" Twitter are mistreating the Putin-sympathizing Tucker, who has directed his army to murder, rape, and torture an entire country, then it's time to check your grip on reality.

No - it was no "paraphrase." It was an outright lie. And, many people believed it. All you have to do is check the replies on the tweet.
And, since when is it "Putin-sympathizing" to be against having a hot war with Russia?
Because, much of what the left has attributed to Carlson as having said - he DIDN'T.
He is against the US getting involved with this war. He has a perspective. That does not make him a "Putin puppet."

No, it's a paraphrase, and everyone agrees with it. Because it's accurate.
And, it's Putin-sympathizing when you're "confused", like Tucker is, why anyone would be aupporting Ukraine, who were invaded without provocation.

I'll say it again: A country is being murdered, raped, and tortured, and Tucker stated he us "confused" why people would take their side. And you're defending him. You're really debasing yourself.

Citation needed for your claim in bold.

Watch his show. He is cheering the dead Ukrainians! Typical republican.

Oh, FFS.
You have clearly never watched his show. Comments like yours are why we take NOTHING the left claims at face value.
When you have to lie to make a point, we know your claims are FOS.

[Anonymous]

He said he was on Russia’s side… why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He said he was on Russia’s side… why?

Citation. TIA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He said he was on Russia’s side… why?

Citation. TIA.

“Cite it for me to refuse to read it so I can maintain the fiction that Tuckyo Rose is ‘just asking questions.’ If I have to think about it really, I’m going to feel lower than dirt for how I’ve framed the world, so any work you put it finding sources and crafting a cogent argument will be for nothing.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is group think in full force. We should be able to ask the question of whether some of these things are false flags or not without being called a “traitor”.

After all, the current Ukrainian regime and its Western support is no stranger to false flags — check out this study from the University of Ottawa.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2658245

Group think? What can be more “group think” than almost the entire remaining Russian population thinking they are fighting Nazis is Ukraine?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is group think in full force. We should be able to ask the question of whether some of these things are false flags or not without being called a “traitor”.

After all, the current Ukrainian regime and its Western support is no stranger to false flags — check out this study from the University of Ottawa.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2658245

Group think? What can be more “group think” than almost the entire remaining Russian population thinking they are fighting Nazis is Ukraine?

One can wholeheartedly believe that the Russian empire’s pretext for this war and the war and everything that goes along with it is wrong and a tragedy, while also being skeptical of our own empire’s actions in this geopolitical conflict and our empire’s own motivations given our history. After all, we are a country that has invaded many countries on false pretexts while using propaganda to justify it — WMD’s for example, and to make matters worse our leadership then used this as further pretext to pass laws like the Patriot Act to domestically spy on US citizens without a warrant and to use billions in our tax dollars to do it. So we as Americans have a right to be skeptical of the official narrative during geopolitical conflicts without automatically being a “traitor” or a “Russian apologist”. That’s just dangerous language to automatically call fellow Americans that and it’s that kind of mentality they leads to Patriot Act 2.0 and many other pitfalls. We are a nation where dissent and criticism is welcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is group think in full force. We should be able to ask the question of whether some of these things are false flags or not without being called a “traitor”.

After all, the current Ukrainian regime and its Western support is no stranger to false flags — check out this study from the University of Ottawa.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2658245

Group think? What can be more “group think” than almost the entire remaining Russian population thinking they are fighting Nazis is Ukraine?

One can wholeheartedly believe that the Russian empire’s pretext for this war and the war and everything that goes along with it is wrong and a tragedy, while also being skeptical of our own empire’s actions in this geopolitical conflict and our empire’s own motivations given our history. After all, we are a country that has invaded many countries on false pretexts while using propaganda to justify it — WMD’s for example, and to make matters worse our leadership then used this as further pretext to pass laws like the Patriot Act to domestically spy on US citizens without a warrant and to use billions in our tax dollars to do it. So we as Americans have a right to be skeptical of the official narrative during geopolitical conflicts without automatically being a “traitor” or a “Russian apologist”. That’s just dangerous language to automatically call fellow Americans that and it’s that kind of mentality they leads to Patriot Act 2.0 and many other pitfalls. We are a nation where dissent and criticism is welcome.

Fox News, their viewers and Tucker were all for the invasion of Iraq and the fake WMD. I fact they propagated all the fake information. Now these same people including you believe and parrot Russian propaganda while attacking the sitting President of the US and American. Why because you want to under this country for trump and the republicans. You have chosen Putin and trump over US. So yes you are a disloyal traitor. I would not use Russia apologist but Russian propagandist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, Russia invaded a democratic country and is now probably committing atrocities,.and this is what the major anchor on FOX News has to say? Smh.

No. This is the problem with people like Joe Walsh. He crap tweets and people believe him. It is totally false.

No, it isn't. This is the problem with FOX viewers, they're disconnected from reality.

The people disconnected from reality are those who believe tweets from Joe Walsh.
The tweet he put out attributing a quote to Carlson is totally false. It is fake news.
And, even though it has been reported.... it is still up. Twitter has chosen to leave a false quote up with no warning label or anything.

And, you folks think Twitter is not biased.

The tweet was a paraphrase, everyone gets that, and everyone agrees it's accurate. When you're the only person in your lonely world gnashing your teeth about how big bad Joe Walsh and "biased" Twitter are mistreating the Putin-sympathizing Tucker, who has directed his army to murder, rape, and torture an entire country, then it's time to check your grip on reality.

No - it was no "paraphrase." It was an outright lie. And, many people believed it. All you have to do is check the replies on the tweet.
And, since when is it "Putin-sympathizing" to be against having a hot war with Russia?
Because, much of what the left has attributed to Carlson as having said - he DIDN'T.
He is against the US getting involved with this war. He has a perspective. That does not make him a "Putin puppet."

No, it's a paraphrase, and everyone agrees with it. Because it's accurate.
And, it's Putin-sympathizing when you're "confused", like Tucker is, why anyone would be aupporting Ukraine, who were invaded without provocation.

I'll say it again: A country is being murdered, raped, and tortured, and Tucker stated he us "confused" why people would take their side. And you're defending him. You're really debasing yourself.

Citation needed for your claim in bold.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, Russia invaded a democratic country and is now probably committing atrocities,.and this is what the major anchor on FOX News has to say? Smh.

No. This is the problem with people like Joe Walsh. He crap tweets and people believe him. It is totally false.

No, it isn't. This is the problem with FOX viewers, they're disconnected from reality.

The people disconnected from reality are those who believe tweets from Joe Walsh.
The tweet he put out attributing a quote to Carlson is totally false. It is fake news.
And, even though it has been reported.... it is still up. Twitter has chosen to leave a false quote up with no warning label or anything.

And, you folks think Twitter is not biased.

The tweet was a paraphrase, everyone gets that, and everyone agrees it's accurate. When you're the only person in your lonely world gnashing your teeth about how big bad Joe Walsh and "biased" Twitter are mistreating the Putin-sympathizing Tucker, who has directed his army to murder, rape, and torture an entire country, then it's time to check your grip on reality.

No - it was no "paraphrase." It was an outright lie. And, many people believed it. All you have to do is check the replies on the tweet.
And, since when is it "Putin-sympathizing" to be against having a hot war with Russia?
Because, much of what the left has attributed to Carlson as having said - he DIDN'T.
He is against the US getting involved with this war. He has a perspective. That does not make him a "Putin puppet."

No, it's a paraphrase, and everyone agrees with it. Because it's accurate.
And, it's Putin-sympathizing when you're "confused", like Tucker is, why anyone would be aupporting Ukraine, who were invaded without provocation.

I'll say it again: A country is being murdered, raped, and tortured, and Tucker stated he us "confused" why people would take their side. And you're defending him. You're really debasing yourself.

Citation needed for your claim in bold.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, Russia invaded a democratic country and is now probably committing atrocities,.and this is what the major anchor on FOX News has to say? Smh.

No. This is the problem with people like Joe Walsh. He crap tweets and people believe him. It is totally false.

No, it isn't. This is the problem with FOX viewers, they're disconnected from reality.

The people disconnected from reality are those who believe tweets from Joe Walsh.
The tweet he put out attributing a quote to Carlson is totally false. It is fake news.
And, even though it has been reported.... it is still up. Twitter has chosen to leave a false quote up with no warning label or anything.

And, you folks think Twitter is not biased.

The tweet was a paraphrase, everyone gets that, and everyone agrees it's accurate. When you're the only person in your lonely world gnashing your teeth about how big bad Joe Walsh and "biased" Twitter are mistreating the Putin-sympathizing Tucker, who has directed his army to murder, rape, and torture an entire country, then it's time to check your grip on reality.

No - it was no "paraphrase." It was an outright lie. And, many people believed it. All you have to do is check the replies on the tweet.
And, since when is it "Putin-sympathizing" to be against having a hot war with Russia?
Because, much of what the left has attributed to Carlson as having said - he DIDN'T.
He is against the US getting involved with this war. He has a perspective. That does not make him a "Putin puppet."

No, it's a paraphrase, and everyone agrees with it. Because it's accurate.
And, it's Putin-sympathizing when you're "confused", like Tucker is, why anyone would be aupporting Ukraine, who were invaded without provocation.

I'll say it again: A country is being murdered, raped, and tortured, and Tucker stated he us "confused" why people would take their side. And you're defending him. You're really debasing yourself.

Citation needed for your claim in bold.

[Anonymous]

"We are a nation where criticism and dissent are welcome. Unless it's criticism of Tucker. That's when criticism becomes groupthink, because Tucker is perfect and can't be criticised."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, Russia invaded a democratic country and is now probably committing atrocities,.and this is what the major anchor on FOX News has to say? Smh.

No. This is the problem with people like Joe Walsh. He crap tweets and people believe him. It is totally false.

No, it isn't. This is the problem with FOX viewers, they're disconnected from reality.

The people disconnected from reality are those who believe tweets from Joe Walsh.
The tweet he put out attributing a quote to Carlson is totally false. It is fake news.
And, even though it has been reported.... it is still up. Twitter has chosen to leave a false quote up with no warning label or anything.

And, you folks think Twitter is not biased.

The tweet was a paraphrase, everyone gets that, and everyone agrees it's accurate. When you're the only person in your lonely world gnashing your teeth about how big bad Joe Walsh and "biased" Twitter are mistreating the Putin-sympathizing Tucker, who has directed his army to murder, rape, and torture an entire country, then it's time to check your grip on reality.

No - it was no "paraphrase." It was an outright lie. And, many people believed it. All you have to do is check the replies on the tweet.
And, since when is it "Putin-sympathizing" to be against having a hot war with Russia?
Because, much of what the left has attributed to Carlson as having said - he DIDN'T.
He is against the US getting involved with this war. He has a perspective. That does not make him a "Putin puppet."

No, it's a paraphrase, and everyone agrees with it. Because it's accurate.
And, it's Putin-sympathizing when you're "confused", like Tucker is, why anyone would be aupporting Ukraine, who were invaded without provocation.

I'll say it again: A country is being murdered, raped, and tortured, and Tucker stated he us "confused" why people would take their side. And you're defending him. You're really debasing yourself.

Citation needed for your claim in bold.

First of all..... that segment is from 2019.
Secondly, one wonders why the clip was cut off so abruptly.......

Carlson eventually walked back the comment about rooting for Russia, saying he was obviously joking and simply mocking the American left's obsession with Moscow, which he doesn't perceive as a serious threat to U.S. interests, especially compared to Beijing.

https://theweek.com/speedreads/880942/fox-news-tucker-carlson-trolls-ukrainerussia-war

[Anonymous]

Have heard Hannity's name for a while. He's pretty unequivocal in what's going on and what needs to happen.

https://rumble.com/vzxo5v-hannity-how-much-more-ukraine-carnage-do-we-need-to-see.html

[Anonymous]

All of your "evidence" that Carlson is on "Russia's side" are ALL clips that were taken long before the invasion by Russia occurred.
He had guests on and was questioning them about what side the US should take, given the past and what is in the best interest of the US.

Posters here have claimed Carlson has made outrageous statements since the invasions, as Russia has shown their brutality and disregard for human life.
Joe Walsh has posted a quote that Carlson NEVER made just to rile up the left. And many believed it to be true.

Please, give evidence that Carlson has said anything that posters HERE claim he has said since the invasion has occurred... specifically:
"A country is being murdered, raped, and tortured, and Tucker stated he us "confused" why people would take their side." (6:42)
"He is cheering the dead Ukrainians!" (7:39)
"He said he was on Russia’s side" (7:56)