Some men are only dating women in mid 40s. The divorced men in my circle are not looking for women who can still have children. They are done. They are dating 45 year old women. I have a 49 year old relative who is dating a 48 year old man with a 6 pack. He is done having children. Both of them have children in high school. |
Lol are you saying IMF economists are cheaters lol |
Very high percentage have pretty frivolous lifestyle on travels, it's a common knowledge |
This is true. I am the son of an IMF economist who didn’t miss and opportunity to cheat on my mom. And he is a narcissist too. He is a great dad did and still does everything for his kids, but he is a horrible husband… |
|
Mid 40s woman and divorced. What I have noticed dating now is the tables have completely turned. When I was in my 20s, I remember my brother saying you better hurry up and get married because your stock is going down because you’re getting older. Guess what now in my 40s it is the opposite of the way it used to be and men are the ones who have more problems dating than women. I have more attention and more power in my 40s than I ever had when I was younger because I was insecure and felt like men had all the power even though I was beautiful and didn’t realize it. Now I basically have my pic of the litter and no I won’t even talk to somebody if they’re under 6 feet because I don’t need to.
Also, I could care less about money, and I always could care less about money because I have my own. |
+1. Different poster here and you’ve described me exactly with the same age and the same height and the same preferences. I settled before and I’m certainly not going to do it now. |
That’s ridiculous. It highly depends on the woman because I can get plenty of men who are over 6 feet. |
+1 |
I beg to differ because women like this, including me we’re strong enough to get out of bad ones and now know what red flags to really truly avoid and what’s worth staying for and what’s worth leaving for. |
Another mid 40s woman here: I'm 5'8, with hills 5'11. I did date and really fell badly into a man who was 5'10-5'11 (he stated 6' on profile but I could never wear hills and not mount over him, so I guess he lied a little). It really depends how shorter man looks like: if he's just thin and not muscular, it gives me a sense that he's "smaller" than myself. If a man is bulky (not fat, but just muscular, has wide shoulders and is confident), then I still feel like he's bigger and is "protected" and can be cuddled by him in bed. This is sexual, nothing I can do about it. The 5'11 guy I really fell into was bulky and very strong. I also liked how we could do it standing, since we were the same level at pelvic area with each other.... I dated after him 6'3 and 6'2 guys, and didn't fall so much into them . Sex was great with both, but just not as much connection intellectually and spiritually. Connection and personality can make up for height somewhat, but only if I feel like a shorter man is till "bigger" than myself in the bedroom. |
Also World Bank economists. Male and female economists... |
Exactly. I’m sure the OP screens for ugliness and beauty. Imagine trying to shame women for having physical preferences when dating, like you are above it all. Please. |
Interesting so that is why my married professor who was an often interviewed economist on tv would be all over me in class. |
|
I have no problem with 5’9. Even 5’7. What I have an issue with is if someone says they’re 5’8 or 5’9 when they are actually 5’5. If you’re a short king, be a short king.
Let’s turn the tables. I’m 120 lbs. I display that I have an athletic build, I include full body pictures, and if someone asks, I say I’m 120 lbs because it’s true. Im not pretending to be 100 lbs. Most guys probably wouldn’t take issue if I were 130 lbs if I accurately represented myself. They would take issue if I said I was 120 lbs but was actually 160 lbs and used 10 year old pictures. |
44. |