Why D1 if the school is only so so?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:University of Richmond --

Women's sports: Basketball, Track/X-Country, Field Hockey, Golf, Lacrosse, Soccer, Swimming, Tennis

That's, in order, 13, 18, 12, 6, 12, 14, 14 and 8 That's 97 total allowed for the women's sports played at the school. At $70k per that would be $6,890,000. But, the stated expense for women's athletics was

How about you stop trying to find outliners and stick with the regular public schools. You’re trying to make a point by cherry-picking.

The point is that once you are out of the Power5 -- your outliers are the schools that offer the full number of soccer scholarships for their women's teams. But -- you do get a ton of fake participation numbers. Golly there are 120 women on crew, and 110 women running cross country and track.

Show me the stats that prove what’s you’re saying because I haven’t seen what your saying.

Not assumptions - stats

Go look. It hard. Colleges have to report their numbers. They are public. Wait — aren’t you the expert on this? Don’t you know where the numbers are reported? An expert would obviously know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:University of Richmond --

Women's sports: Basketball, Track/X-Country, Field Hockey, Golf, Lacrosse, Soccer, Swimming, Tennis

That's, in order, 13, 18, 12, 6, 12, 14, 14 and 8 That's 97 total allowed for the women's sports played at the school. At $70k per that would be $6,890,000. But, the stated expense for women's athletics was

How about you stop trying to find outliners and stick with the regular public schools. You’re trying to make a point by cherry-picking.

The point is that once you are out of the Power5 -- your outliers are the schools that offer the full number of soccer scholarships for their women's teams. But -- you do get a ton of fake participation numbers. Golly there are 120 women on crew, and 110 women running cross country and track.

Show me the stats that prove what’s you’re saying because I haven’t seen what your saying.

Not assumptions - stats

Go look. It hard. Colleges have to report their numbers. They are public. Wait — aren’t you the expert on this? Don’t you know where the numbers are reported? An expert would obviously know.

Wait - don’t you know that this thread is read by 100 people. Your don’t really think it’s just you and I posting….do ya?

You’re obsessed with power 5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:University of Richmond --

Women's sports: Basketball, Track/X-Country, Field Hockey, Golf, Lacrosse, Soccer, Swimming, Tennis

That's, in order, 13, 18, 12, 6, 12, 14, 14 and 8 That's 97 total allowed for the women's sports played at the school. At $70k per that would be $6,890,000. But, the stated expense for women's athletics was

How about you stop trying to find outliners and stick with the regular public schools. You’re trying to make a point by cherry-picking.

The point is that once you are out of the Power5 -- your outliers are the schools that offer the full number of soccer scholarships for their women's teams. But -- you do get a ton of fake participation numbers. Golly there are 120 women on crew, and 110 women running cross country and track.

Show me the stats that prove what’s you’re saying because I haven’t seen what your saying.

Not assumptions - stats

Go look. It hard. Colleges have to report their numbers. They are public. Wait — aren’t you the expert on this? Don’t you know where the numbers are reported? An expert would obviously know.

Wait - don’t you know that this thread is read by 100 people. Your don’t really think it’s just you and I posting….do ya?

You’re obsessed with power 5

Come on professor, do tell. Obviously you know, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:University of Richmond --

Women's sports: Basketball, Track/X-Country, Field Hockey, Golf, Lacrosse, Soccer, Swimming, Tennis

That's, in order, 13, 18, 12, 6, 12, 14, 14 and 8 That's 97 total allowed for the women's sports played at the school. At $70k per that would be $6,890,000. But, the stated expense for women's athletics was

How about you stop trying to find outliners and stick with the regular public schools. You’re trying to make a point by cherry-picking.

The point is that once you are out of the Power5 -- your outliers are the schools that offer the full number of soccer scholarships for their women's teams. But -- you do get a ton of fake participation numbers. Golly there are 120 women on crew, and 110 women running cross country and track.

Show me the stats that prove what’s you’re saying because I haven’t seen what your saying.

Not assumptions - stats

Go look. It hard. Colleges have to report their numbers. They are public. Wait — aren’t you the expert on this? Don’t you know where the numbers are reported? An expert would obviously know.

Wait - don’t you know that this thread is read by 100 people. Your don’t really think it’s just you and I posting….do ya?

You’re obsessed with power 5

Come on professor, do tell. Obviously you know, right?

I’ve been around the block once or twice.

Here’s something you may find interesting. A lot of kids that go Power 5 get substantial less athletic money than kids that go non- Power 5.

Should I tell you why or can you guess?

[Anonymous]

Come on - you know where to look right? Or are you just blowing smoke?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Come on - you know where to look right? Or are you just blowing smoke?

Blowing smoke about what

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Girls: 14 full
Typical roster size: 30

I’ll make up some numbers -

About 4 full ride players (10’remaining)

The remaining 10 scholarships are broken down into 3/4, 1/2, 1/3, etc. among the remaining 25 players

So, find the school where your kid will be the top recruit if you want the money.

Yes, very true. Think of CC as a second chance to apply to UVA or W&M or Tech.

NoVA community college baby. Here we come. Full ride.

You joke….but I’ll take it

To avoid loans the smartest thing is 2 years at Nova CC and then transferring into any of the big VA state universities for the last 2 years. Also easier to get in them coming out if senior year HS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Girls: 14 full
Typical roster size: 30

I’ll make up some numbers -

About 4 full ride players (10’remaining)

The remaining 10 scholarships are broken down into 3/4, 1/2, 1/3, etc. among the remaining 25 players

So, find the school where your kid will be the top recruit if you want the money.

Yes, very true. Think of CC as a second chance to apply to UVA or W&M or Tech.

NoVA community college baby. Here we come. Full ride.

You joke….but I’ll take it

To avoid loans the smartest thing is 2 years at Nova CC and then transferring into any of the big VA state universities for the last 2 years. Also easier to get in them coming out if senior year HS.

Yes, very true. Think of CC as a second chance to apply to UVA or W&M or Tech

[Anonymous]

Lol..ok sure. Uva recruits lots of players from nova cc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lol..ok sure. Uva recruits lots of players from nova cc.

That was in reference to saving $ since nobody is getting $ from colleges, particularly on the boys’ side and the quality of schools is low.

Follow along.

[Anonymous]

Anyone that is concerned about saving money is not playing overpriced deluxe youth soccer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone that is concerned about saving money is not playing overpriced deluxe youth soccer.

There are people that think soccer will pay for their kids’ college tuition. A ridiculous amount of them. They forget how much they are spending on soccer each year.

I know tons of middle class people spending a sh@t ton on soccer and very worried about how to pay college tuition for their kids. $25-65k/year 1 kid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol..ok sure. Uva recruits lots of players from nova cc.

That was in reference to saving $ since nobody is getting $ from colleges, particularly on the boys’ side and the quality of schools is low.

Follow along.

Don’t listen to this guy. He’s inexperienced. A large number of girls on my kids team went to school on fulls rides. Mostly athletic money. Mostly non-Power 5.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lol..ok sure. Uva recruits lots of players from nova cc.

Playing soccer for university that is phenomenal academically should be placed into the "Dream" box. Nothing wrong with chasing it, but a mistake if you don't have other options.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone that is concerned about saving money is not playing overpriced deluxe youth soccer.

There are people that think soccer will pay for their kids’ college tuition. A ridiculous amount of them. They forget how much they are spending on soccer each year.

I know tons of middle class people spending a sh@t ton on soccer and very worried about how to pay college tuition for their kids. $25-65k/year 1 kid.

Spent about 60,000 on soccer. Kid got a full ride worth 200,000.