Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An FBI investigation serves 2 purposes:

1. Provide cover for certain moderate senators to vote yes.

2. Give the White House time to consider the possible benefits of a withdrawal.

3. Give the democrats time to find more women.

Correction , pay and/or find more false accusers willing to be a martar for liberalism

Evidence that Ford is a false accuser who was paid?

Likely was a reference to Swetnick, whose story crumbled within hours.

nope, her story is credible. The smear of her background that happened right away has already crumbled.

I know Swetnick. She mentioned she had horrible stories about mutual acquaintances in Chevy Chase...3 years ago to me.

Thank you for sticking up for her. I’m tired of the smear jobs.

I am so sorry for what happened to Swetnick. I believe her. I am so sorry. If you talk to her again, please tell her, REAL PEOPLE are sorry for what happened. And REAL PEOPLE admire her bravery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't it be smart for Kavanaugh to step down now? The FBI information could lead to stuff that could jeopardize his current position.

Only he knows. But I suspect so. He clearly doesn’t want an FBI investigation. If he’s going to withdraw, he better do it soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what comes out in the FBI report, no Dems will vote for BK anyways.

Who really thinks that this BS calling for a FBI investigation will change anything.

So if the FBI clears him, then it will be we can’t vote for him cuz abortion, gun laws, etc.. it will then be another set off issues.

How exactly would the FBI “clear” him? Not turning up anything new would surprise no one, and wouldn’t mean that he has been proven innocent.

He's presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. And I know....I know....it's not a trial, but the same principle applies: you can't prove a negative.

SHE has to prove that he's guilty, not the other way around.

Huh? She does not have to prove anything. She just has to be truthful. Even Republicans found her credible.

She sounded emotional and compelling. However, the gaps, inconsistencies and lack of corroboration are overwhelming. She suffers the most traumatic event of her life and can't recall how she got home despite being stranded miles from home in the pre-cell phone age yet specifically remembers she had a single beer? Not credible.

So if she wanted to lie, why wouldn't she just say "I took a bus home?"

Because you could easily show that wasn't true. Serious Q. Why did her attorneys not tell her -- as the NYTimes and numerous emails establish -- that the Senate Jd. Committee offered to come to her in California over a week ago. Ford herself is likely innocent, but her attorney (recommended by Senate Democrats) were playing a delay game in hopes that more bad coverage would push BK to drop out. Telling their client that the Senate wouldn't come to her in CA. Telling the Senate she needed to drive to Washington DC from CA because she wouldnt fly! Suggests like the attorneys were embedded with the Democrats.

Give it up. It wasn't political. He is a slimeball. Pick someone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what comes out in the FBI report, no Dems will vote for BK anyways.

Who really thinks that this BS calling for a FBI investigation will change anything.

So if the FBI clears him, then it will be we can’t vote for him cuz abortion, gun laws, etc.. it will then be another set off issues.

How exactly would the FBI “clear” him? Not turning up anything new would surprise no one, and wouldn’t mean that he has been proven innocent.

He's presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. And I know....I know....it's not a trial, but the same principle applies: you can't prove a negative.

SHE has to prove that he's guilty, not the other way around.

Huh? She does not have to prove anything. She just has to be truthful. Even Republicans found her credible.

She sounded emotional and compelling. However, the gaps, inconsistencies and lack of corroboration are overwhelming. She suffers the most traumatic event of her life and can't recall how she got home despite being stranded miles from home in the pre-cell phone age yet specifically remembers she had a single beer? Not credible.

So if she wanted to lie, why wouldn't she just say "I took a bus home?"

Because you could easily show that wasn't true. Serious Q. Why did her attorneys not tell her -- as the NYTimes and numerous emails establish -- that the Senate Jd. Committee offered to come to her in California over a week ago. Ford herself is likely innocent, but her attorney (recommended by Senate Democrats) were playing a delay game in hopes that more bad coverage would push BK to drop out. Telling their client that the Senate wouldn't come to her in CA. Telling the Senate she needed to drive to Washington DC from CA because she wouldnt fly! Suggests like the attorneys were embedded with the Democrats.

Her lawyers were negotiating on her behalf. You seem to think that they were not representing her interests. It seems like they were, to me.

So they were lying to her and you call that negotiating? We were told that the reason we had to delay yet another week was because Ford was in California and couldn't fly to DC. In response, the Senate Jd. Chair informed -- in MULTIPLE documented emails -- that he would be willing to bring the hearing to her residence in CA. Grassley bent over backwards offering this and yet we learn at the hearing her lawyers never told her of this! And then she said she would have preferred it. Who is really looking out for her interests? Grassley was told she wouldn't fly. Yet again, a falsehood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An FBI investigation serves 2 purposes:

1. Provide cover for certain moderate senators to vote yes.

2. Give the White House time to consider the possible benefits of a withdrawal.

3. Give the democrats time to find more women.

Correction , pay and/or find more false accusers willing to be a martar for liberalism

Evidence that Ford is a false accuser who was paid?

Likely was a reference to Swetnick, whose story crumbled within hours.

nope, her story is credible. The smear of her background that happened right away has already crumbled.

I know Swetnick. She mentioned she had horrible stories about mutual acquaintances in Chevy Chase...3 years ago to me.

Thank you for sticking up for her. I’m tired of the smear jobs.

I am so sorry for what happened to Swetnick. I believe her. I am so sorry. If you talk to her again, please tell her, REAL PEOPLE are sorry for what happened. And REAL PEOPLE admire her bravery.

You might want to contact the FBI with this important corroborating evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what comes out in the FBI report, no Dems will vote for BK anyways.

Who really thinks that this BS calling for a FBI investigation will change anything.

So if the FBI clears him, then it will be we can’t vote for him cuz abortion, gun laws, etc.. it will then be another set off issues.

How exactly would the FBI “clear” him? Not turning up anything new would surprise no one, and wouldn’t mean that he has been proven innocent.

He's presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. And I know....I know....it's not a trial, but the same principle applies: you can't prove a negative.

SHE has to prove that he's guilty, not the other way around.

Huh? She does not have to prove anything. She just has to be truthful. Even Republicans found her credible.

She sounded emotional and compelling. However, the gaps, inconsistencies and lack of corroboration are overwhelming. She suffers the most traumatic event of her life and can't recall how she got home despite being stranded miles from home in the pre-cell phone age yet specifically remembers she had a single beer? Not credible.

So if she wanted to lie, why wouldn't she just say "I took a bus home?"

Because you could easily show that wasn't true. Serious Q. Why did her attorneys not tell her -- as the NYTimes and numerous emails establish -- that the Senate Jd. Committee offered to come to her in California over a week ago. Ford herself is likely innocent, but her attorney (recommended by Senate Democrats) were playing a delay game in hopes that more bad coverage would push BK to drop out. Telling their client that the Senate wouldn't come to her in CA. Telling the Senate she needed to drive to Washington DC from CA because she wouldnt fly! Suggests like the attorneys were embedded with the Democrats.

Give it up. It wasn't political. He is a slimeball. Pick someone else.

You didn't address any of the specific facts showing that her legal team is working with Senate Democrats to try and delay. Address my specific points. I'll address any specific questions or claims of evidence you bring too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Wouldn't it be smart for Kavanaugh to step down now? The FBI information could lead to stuff that could jeopardize his current position.


Only he knows. But I suspect so. He clearly doesn’t want an FBI investigation. If he’s going to withdraw, he better do it soon.

+1 I posted the question about what happens if the FBI finds out that he perjured himself? Can a sitting SJ go to jail for perjury? What is the ABA disbars him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what comes out in the FBI report, no Dems will vote for BK anyways.

Who really thinks that this BS calling for a FBI investigation will change anything.

So if the FBI clears him, then it will be we can’t vote for him cuz abortion, gun laws, etc.. it will then be another set off issues.

How exactly would the FBI “clear” him? Not turning up anything new would surprise no one, and wouldn’t mean that he has been proven innocent.

He's presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. And I know....I know....it's not a trial, but the same principle applies: you can't prove a negative.

SHE has to prove that he's guilty, not the other way around.

Huh? She does not have to prove anything. She just has to be truthful. Even Republicans found her credible.

So are you saying that an allegation, even if the person making it sounds credible, is sufficient to ruin someone’s career? Do you realize what that opens the door for? She essentially has no corroborating evidence, and the people she identified as being in a position to support her accusation either denied knowledge or outright refuted it. I can’t understand how so many are willing to destroy this guy (or anyone) over an unsubstantiated allegation. I guess I do understand - you hate his politics and/or the person who nominated him.

Credible allegations are why Paterno, Cosby and Larry Nassar have destroyed careers and they ARE IN JAIL. They are why Matt Lauer's and Harvey Weinstein's careers are over.
YES THIS IS HOW IT WORKS.

OMG what is the solution???
don't rape people, that is the solution.

By arguing this you are saying we should let Paterno, Cosby, Nassar, Lauer and Weinstein off the hook. Is that what you want? Is Kavanaugh THAT big a deal to you?
Hell no

All those you cite above were convicted because there was signicant, often unrefiutable evidence against them, as well as the corroborating and credibl testimony of multiple witnesses. That’s not the case with Kavanaugh.

When they were ACCUSED the evidence was only the statements of the victims. GOP made sure up until now there were only party people like graham who would swim across with the Potomac with Kavanaugh on his back to get him confirmed.

And thank GOD Ford got decent lawyers who are able to hold their own with the GOP senate judiciary committee members. THANK GOD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't it be smart for Kavanaugh to step down now? The FBI information could lead to stuff that could jeopardize his current position.

I really think it’s dangerous for his mental stability if he doesn’t.

Oh FFS. He is perfectly stable and you know it.
Now if you want to talk about Dr Ford’s mental stability......

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what comes out in the FBI report, no Dems will vote for BK anyways.

Who really thinks that this BS calling for a FBI investigation will change anything.

So if the FBI clears him, then it will be we can’t vote for him cuz abortion, gun laws, etc.. it will then be another set off issues.

How exactly would the FBI “clear” him? Not turning up anything new would surprise no one, and wouldn’t mean that he has been proven innocent.

He's presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. And I know....I know....it's not a trial, but the same principle applies: you can't prove a negative.

SHE has to prove that he's guilty, not the other way around.

Huh? She does not have to prove anything. She just has to be truthful. Even Republicans found her credible.

She sounded emotional and compelling. However, the gaps, inconsistencies and lack of corroboration are overwhelming. She suffers the most traumatic event of her life and can't recall how she got home despite being stranded miles from home in the pre-cell phone age yet specifically remembers she had a single beer? Not credible.

So if she wanted to lie, why wouldn't she just say "I took a bus home?"

Because you could easily show that wasn't true. Serious Q. Why did her attorneys not tell her -- as the NYTimes and numerous emails establish -- that the Senate Jd. Committee offered to come to her in California over a week ago. Ford herself is likely innocent, but her attorney (recommended by Senate Democrats) were playing a delay game in hopes that more bad coverage would push BK to drop out. Telling their client that the Senate wouldn't come to her in CA. Telling the Senate she needed to drive to Washington DC from CA because she wouldnt fly! Suggests like the attorneys were embedded with the Democrats.

Her lawyers were negotiating on her behalf. You seem to think that they were not representing her interests. It seems like they were, to me.

So they were lying to her and you call that negotiating? We were told that the reason we had to delay yet another week was because Ford was in California and couldn't fly to DC. In response, the Senate Jd. Chair informed -- in MULTIPLE documented emails -- that he would be willing to bring the hearing to her residence in CA. Grassley bent over backwards offering this and yet we learn at the hearing her lawyers never told her of this! And then she said she would have preferred it. Who is really looking out for her interests? Grassley was told she wouldn't fly. Yet again, a falsehood.

+1 The Democrats AND her attorneys have used Ford as a weapon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't it be smart for Kavanaugh to step down now? The FBI information could lead to stuff that could jeopardize his current position.

Prediction. Kavanaugh will end up ruining his own life due to his arrogant belief he’s an untouchable. He’ll have plenty of time to watch Game of Thrones schooling himself on shifting allegiances in politics.

Sorry Brett, they didn’t teach this know how at your prestigious Yale nor at the corner store where you bought all those ‘skis. You’re most certainly out in every chess move I could imagine. Your next best move, save your current position. You don’t have the leverage to go nuclear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An FBI investigation serves 2 purposes:

1. Provide cover for certain moderate senators to vote yes.

2. Give the White House time to consider the possible benefits of a withdrawal.

3. Give the democrats time to find more women.

Correction , pay and/or find more false accusers willing to be a martar for liberalism

Evidence that Ford is a false accuser who was paid?

Likely was a reference to Swetnick, whose story crumbled within hours.

nope, her story is credible. The smear of her background that happened right away has already crumbled.

I know Swetnick. She mentioned she had horrible stories about mutual acquaintances in Chevy Chase...3 years ago to me.

Thank you for sticking up for her. I’m tired of the smear jobs.

I am so sorry for what happened to Swetnick. I believe her. I am so sorry. If you talk to her again, please tell her, REAL PEOPLE are sorry for what happened. And REAL PEOPLE admire her bravery.

You might want to contact the FBI with this important corroborating evidence.

Who do I call? Just the DC office?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Wouldn't it be smart for Kavanaugh to step down now? The FBI information could lead to stuff that could jeopardize his current position.


Only he knows. But I suspect so. He clearly doesn’t want an FBI investigation. If he’s going to withdraw, he better do it soon.

+1 I posted the question about what happens if the FBI finds out that he perjured himself? Can a sitting SJ go to jail for perjury? What is the ABA disbars him?

They won’t so it’s not a worthy of question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what comes out in the FBI report, no Dems will vote for BK anyways.

Who really thinks that this BS calling for a FBI investigation will change anything.

So if the FBI clears him, then it will be we can’t vote for him cuz abortion, gun laws, etc.. it will then be another set off issues.

How exactly would the FBI “clear” him? Not turning up anything new would surprise no one, and wouldn’t mean that he has been proven innocent.

He's presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. And I know....I know....it's not a trial, but the same principle applies: you can't prove a negative.

SHE has to prove that he's guilty, not the other way around.

Huh? She does not have to prove anything. She just has to be truthful. Even Republicans found her credible.

She sounded emotional and compelling. However, the gaps, inconsistencies and lack of corroboration are overwhelming. She suffers the most traumatic event of her life and can't recall how she got home despite being stranded miles from home in the pre-cell phone age yet specifically remembers she had a single beer? Not credible.

So if she wanted to lie, why wouldn't she just say "I took a bus home?"

Because you could easily show that wasn't true. Serious Q. Why did her attorneys not tell her -- as the NYTimes and numerous emails establish -- that the Senate Jd. Committee offered to come to her in California over a week ago. Ford herself is likely innocent, but her attorney (recommended by Senate Democrats) were playing a delay game in hopes that more bad coverage would push BK to drop out. Telling their client that the Senate wouldn't come to her in CA. Telling the Senate she needed to drive to Washington DC from CA because she wouldnt fly! Suggests like the attorneys were embedded with the Democrats.

Her lawyers were negotiating on her behalf. You seem to think that they were not representing her interests. It seems like they were, to me.

So they were lying to her and you call that negotiating? We were told that the reason we had to delay yet another week was because Ford was in California and couldn't fly to DC. In response, the Senate Jd. Chair informed -- in MULTIPLE documented emails -- that he would be willing to bring the hearing to her residence in CA. Grassley bent over backwards offering this and yet we learn at the hearing her lawyers never told her of this! And then she said she would have preferred it. Who is really looking out for her interests? Grassley was told she wouldn't fly. Yet again, a falsehood.

+1 The Democrats AND her attorneys have used Ford as a weapon.

How quickly you forget that Whelan immediately cooked up the failed "mistaken identity" thing right away. Her lawyers PROTECTED HER and bless them for that. He lied his ASS OFF at that hearing. He is toast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An FBI investigation serves 2 purposes:

1. Provide cover for certain moderate senators to vote yes.

2. Give the White House time to consider the possible benefits of a withdrawal.

3. Give the democrats time to find more women.

Correction , pay and/or find more false accusers willing to be a martar for liberalism

Evidence that Ford is a false accuser who was paid?

Likely was a reference to Swetnick, whose story crumbled within hours.

nope, her story is credible. The smear of her background that happened right away has already crumbled.

I know Swetnick. She mentioned she had horrible stories about mutual acquaintances in Chevy Chase...3 years ago to me.

Thank you for sticking up for her. I’m tired of the smear jobs.

I am so sorry for what happened to Swetnick. I believe her. I am so sorry. If you talk to her again, please tell her, REAL PEOPLE are sorry for what happened. And REAL PEOPLE admire her bravery.

You might want to contact the FBI with this important corroborating evidence.

Who do I call? Just the DC office?

Call Avenatti. Then he can trot you out in front of cameras too.