SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I guess Lankford wants to be primaried.

MAGA is that what you really want? You want people to be punished for holding officials responsible? Have you forgot out draining the swamp?

[Anonymous]

The Hill
The White House said Monday that its probe into how a journalist was added to a group chat of officials discussing military strikes is closed, as the administration seeks to move past the controversy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Hill
The White House said Monday that its probe into how a journalist was added to a group chat of officials discussing military strikes is closed, as the administration seeks to move past the controversy.

The White House may be “done” but America is not. This was a security breach that could have easily resulted in the death of Americans. Congress had best start earning its paycheck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Hill
The White House said Monday that its probe into how a journalist was added to a group chat of officials discussing military strikes is closed, as the administration seeks to move past the controversy.

Waltz already told them how the journalist was added to his phone: he said the journalist’s phone number was “sucked into his phone.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Hill
The White House said Monday that its probe into how a journalist was added to a group chat of officials discussing military strikes is closed, as the administration seeks to move past the controversy.

Waltz already told them how the journalist was added to his phone: he said the journalist’s phone number was “sucked into his phone.”

LOL

WTF you MAGAs are such dumbsh*ts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I guess Lankford wants to be primaried.

Another republican (committee chair) already called for this. It is called patriotism, and taking your oath of office seriously.

[Anonymous]

Republican Senator on the Armed Services Committee:

“I think they should make sure it never happens again. I wish they’d tell us, ‘It will never happen again.’ It’s the first strike in the early stages of an administration,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Don’t let it ever happen again.”

“I don’t know how many strikes you get. In baseball, you get three. Maybe this is worth two,” he added. “If mistakes like this continue to happen, we’ll deal with them as it happens. My hope and my expectation is that it won’t.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5216365-hegseth-scrutiny-republican-lawmakers/amp/

Translation: Why can’t these people ever dammit they’ve done anything wrong?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Hill
The White House said Monday that its probe into how a journalist was added to a group chat of officials discussing military strikes is closed, as the administration seeks to move past the controversy.

All this does is prove the critics right that Trump doesn’t care about our soldiers or their safety

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So-called “signalgate” is a nothingburger.

What’s the opposite of a nothingburger?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So-called “signalgate” is a nothingburger.

Because MAGA think it's fine to use unsecured channels to talk about secret military ops. But, HRC using an unsecured email? That is a "lock her up" infraction. Right?

Regular Americans think this is worse than anything Hillary did.

"A higher share of adults polled said they thought Signalgate was a serious problem than said the same about then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server in past polls."
https://www.axios.com/2025/03/27/trump-signal-group-chat-yemen-strike-poll

[Anonymous]

Not doubt they had top men looking into it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not doubt they had top men looking into it.

They don’t. They’ve already said they aren’t looking at it at all. Because they don’t care about the airmen they put at risk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not doubt they had top men looking into it.

They don’t. They’ve already said they aren’t looking at it at all. Because they don’t care about the airmen they put at risk.

They are like children playing with toy soldiers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not doubt they had top men looking into it.

BigBa**z is bizzy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not doubt they had top men looking into it.

They don’t. They’ve already said they aren’t looking at it at all. Because they don’t care about the airmen they put at risk.

They are like children playing with toy soldiers.

It’s an unfortunately high stakes video game and we are all just disposable extras.