GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

[Anonymous]

Prosecutor gigolo billed 24 hrs in one day lolz

Felony (no lunch? No sleep? No rest?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor gigolo billed 24 hrs in one day lolz

Felony (no lunch? No sleep? No rest?)

That's not a felony, jeez. It's just too-minimal billing description.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

And none of this absolves Trump, even if true (HUGE "if").

[Anonymous]

On Threads:

Via Ryan Goodman

Fani Willis responds to allegations.

1. She hired 3 special counsels. All were paid same hourly rate, including Nathan Wade. [Others were a white man and a white woman.]

2. Wade was previously hired by a Republican official [in a different county] and paid twice the rate.

Willis points to racial discrimination in criticisms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On Threads:

Via Ryan Goodman

Fani Willis responds to allegations.

1. She hired 3 special counsels. All were paid same hourly rate, including Nathan Wade. [Others were a white man and a white woman.]

2. Wade was previously hired by a Republican official [in a different county] and paid twice the rate.

Willis points to racial discrimination in criticisms.

Questions for dear Fani -

Were you also sleeping with and going on extravagant vacations with the white man and white woman?
Did you also pay the white man and white woman nearly $700,000 thus far?
Did you also not seek approval as is required by law to hire the white man and white woman?
Do the white woman and white man have zero experience prosecuting felony trials like Nathan Wade?
Why do you feel the need to defend yourself by playing the race card?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

[Anonymous]

Trump wins again

Ugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

... who happens to be the one to approve the compensation. Huge conflict of interest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.