GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nathan Wade attended "John Marshall School of Law" in Atlanta ranked #171 out of 178.

Plenty of good PI lawyers who graduated from the worst law school in the country.

He apparently is not one of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of the revelations change the case against Trump and his compadres.

However, big fanny and her boyfriend caused significant damage to the prosecutions' case, not to mention hiring a small time PI lawyer to handle the RICO case against the former POTUS.

This controversy has delayed the trial date to 2015 - after the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of the revelations change the case against Trump and his compadres.

However, big fanny and her boyfriend caused significant damage to the prosecutions' case, not to mention hiring a small time PI lawyer to handle the RICO case against the former POTUS.

This controversy has delayed the trial date to 2015 - after the election.

It was never going to happy before the election anyway. Frankly 2025 is optimistic. Maybe they do jury selection in 2025.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of the revelations change the case against Trump and his compadres.

However, big fanny and her boyfriend caused significant damage to the prosecutions' case, not to mention hiring a small time PI lawyer to handle the RICO case against the former POTUS.

This controversy has delayed the trial date to 2015 - after the election.

Turn your brain on. Who else would agree to prosecute the former and potentially current president?

You're so busy name calling that you can't even think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds unethical to hire your relatively inexperienced boyfriend to head a major prosecution of a former POTUS, but I'm not sure it's illegal. They are not married, so he is not a relative, which would be nepotism. She may have had trouble finding someone she trusted to take the position.
But optics...
It she's the cause of his divorce...
It has no bearing on the evidence against Trump, which is massive, but again, optics...
If they are romantically involved, she will have to dismiss him. There may be ethics rules in her workplace that prohibit workplace relationships??
However, the garbage that he's paying for vacations with her using his salary, well, huh? How else is he going to pay for vacations? I pay for vacations with my salary. I assume he earns his salary. There is no allegation that he doesn't. He can spend it as he wants.

Here is more information about why it may well have been not only unethical, but illegal for her to hire him.....

The bombshell public filing alleged that special prosecutor Nathan Wade, a private attorney, paid for lavish vacations he took with Willis using the Fulton County funds his law firm received. County records show that Wade, who has played a prominent role in the election interference case, has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees since January 2022. The DA authorizes his compensation.

Roman’s lawyer, Ashleigh Merchant, said she reviewed the case file in Wade’s ongoing divorce proceedings at the Superior Court Clerk’s Office and made copies of certain documents. But the case file was later improperly sealed because no court hearing was held as required by law, the motion said.

The motion said the checks sent to Wade from Fulton County and his subsequent purchase of vacations for Willis could amount to honest services fraud, a federal crime in which a vendor gives kickbacks to an employer. It is also possible this could be prosecuted under the federal racketeering statute, the motion said

Willis and Wade, the motion contends, “have been engaged in an improper, clandestine personal relationship during the pendency of this case, which has resulted in the special prosecutor, and, in turn, the district attorney, profiting significantly from this prosecution at the expense of the taxpayers.”

A problem with Wade’s appointment is that it was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law, the motion said. The motion also questions Wade’s credentials, contending he has never prosecuted a felony case. (Wade was an assistant solicitor for Cobb County in 1999. The office handles misdemeanor cases.)

https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-filing-alleges-improper-relationship-between-fulton-da-top-trump-prosecutor/A2N2OWCM7FFWJBQH2ORAK2BKMQ/

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of the revelations change the case against Trump and his compadres.

However, big fanny and her boyfriend caused significant damage to the prosecutions' case, not to mention hiring a small time PI lawyer to handle the RICO case against the former POTUS.

This controversy has delayed the trial date to 2015 - after the election.

Turn your brain on. Who else would agree to prosecute the former and potentially current president?

You're so busy name calling that you can't even think.

I found at least 10 GA attorneys with experience prosecuting RICO cases as well as complex felony cases in 3 minutes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of the revelations change the case against Trump and his compadres.

However, big fanny and her boyfriend caused significant damage to the prosecutions' case, not to mention hiring a small time PI lawyer to handle the RICO case against the former POTUS.

This controversy has delayed the trial date to 2015 - after the election.

Turn your brain on. Who else would agree to prosecute the former and potentially current president?

You're so busy name calling that you can't even think.

I found at least 10 GA attorneys with experience prosecuting RICO cases as well as complex felony cases in 3 minutes.

How many are willing to get SWATTED, receive death threats, and get defamed every day on Fox for the next several years?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of the revelations change the case against Trump and his compadres.

However, big fanny and her boyfriend caused significant damage to the prosecutions' case, not to mention hiring a small time PI lawyer to handle the RICO case against the former POTUS.

This controversy has delayed the trial date to 2015 - after the election.

Turn your brain on. Who else would agree to prosecute the former and potentially current president?

You're so busy name calling that you can't even think.

I found at least 10 GA attorneys with experience prosecuting RICO cases as well as complex felony cases in 3 minutes.

How many are willing to get SWATTED, receive death threats, and get defamed every day on Fox for the next several years?

You mean just like what is happening to Trump lawyers? What goes around comes around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of the revelations change the case against Trump and his compadres.

However, big fanny and her boyfriend caused significant damage to the prosecutions' case, not to mention hiring a small time PI lawyer to handle the RICO case against the former POTUS.

This controversy has delayed the trial date to 2015 - after the election.

Turn your brain on. Who else would agree to prosecute the former and potentially current president?

You're so busy name calling that you can't even think.

I found at least 10 GA attorneys with experience prosecuting RICO cases as well as complex felony cases in 3 minutes.

How many are willing to get SWATTED, receive death threats, and get defamed every day on Fox for the next several years?

You mean just like what is happening to Trump lawyers? What goes around comes around.

Oh look, another MAGA justifying threats of violence.

[Anonymous]

Even if it is all true re Willis/Wade, why would the case be dismissed? How does the misconduct impact the substance of the charges? It is the State of Georgia vs Trump so they can just put in another prosecutor/DA and the case goes on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even if it is all true re Willis/Wade, why would the case be dismissed? How does the misconduct impact the substance of the charges? It is the State of Georgia vs Trump so they can just put in another prosecutor/DA and the case goes on.

Who?

Lawyers are risk averse people by nature and by training. This prosecution is a very risky thing to do. As this thread shows.

[Anonymous]

LOL. She's guilty as sin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Aka

Fani Willis- what I did was wrong, but please ignore it while I prosecute a man for a made up crime….

🤡

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.