Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who thinks the nuclear weapons angle was leaked to WaPo by Trump so that whatever is released tomorrow will seem less urgent in comparison. something seems off about all this. in any event, i will sleep a lot better if it's NOT about nuclear weapons.

It’s about nuclear weapons.

Any of our resident Trump apologists want to please explain why Trump would want to have documents on nuclear weapons?

How do you know that’s what he has? Because a leaker told the WaPo? I’m a bit more skeptical I guess than most - I like to see hard evidence.

Ah, the impossible to meet standard. The DOJ isn’t about to let you see the hard evidence, namely, top secret documents because you are a skeptic. Ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love the smell of Trumper’s sweet salty tears in the morning.

Trumper tears should be a coffee brand.

Cofeve!

Omg yes. TM

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Riddle me this... why did Merrick Garland approve this search warrant but not for the Unibomber?

https://www.foxnews.com/media/merrick-garland-recommend-approval-ag-search-warrant-unabombers-cabin-former-fbi-official

Sounds like Garland was making sure the search warrant was air tight, foreseeing that something like this might happen

Lawyers defending Unabomber suspect Theodore Kaczynski accused FBI agents Friday of lying to convince a judge last year to permit them to search Kaczynski’s Montana cabin.
The charge prompted a prosecutor to angrily reply that agents needed to move quickly to protect public safety.

With Kaczynski seated at the defense table, the former UC Berkeley math professor’s lawyers cited several instances when they say agents either lied or misled U.S. District Judge Charles Lovell of Montana last April when they persuaded him to issue the search warrant.

Defense lawyers Quin Denvir and Judy Clarke made the comments in an effort to convince U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell, the Sacramento judge who is presiding over Kaczynski’s case, to throw out the guts of the prosecution’s case--evidence seized from the cabin.

Prosecutors acknowledge there may have been misstatements in the massive search warrant affidavit, and that some passages may have been unclear.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-05-24-mn-62140-story.html

[Anonymous]

What’s missing in s add lol this? A straightforward denial by Trump that he removed any classified documents from the WH.

[Anonymous]

Honestly, if I’m the judge here, everyone is in my flipping office this morning. Your client wants it out, let’s put it out.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

For everyone saying that the padlock on the room with the beach umbrellas was sufficient…

[Anonymous]

So much deflection, whataboutism, outright lying, and weird contortions Trumpists have to resort to support their cult leader! Life would be so simple for them if they accept reality.

Sad!

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

It's so clear this is how this is going to play out. Trump will say "hey, I want them released...but my counsel is telling me 'no' for reasons XYZ".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for the FBI to raid a certain Chicago home looking for the 30 million documents promised to be digitized.

This is such a galactically stupid post. So much so that I imagine it'll be worked into this weekend's talking points.

It's already been out there. I saw it on Facebook on Wednesday.
His failure to digitize the documents is not illegal because he had all of the right permissions to take them.

Oh! if you saw it on Facebook then it must be true!

[Anonymous]

Isn't the DOJ motion just one channel for release? I thought news organizations had done the same earlier this week. Does Trump have veto rights over them as well?

[Anonymous]

Motion filed to release the underlying affidavit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Republicans: This warrant is a farce! Show it to us!

DOJ: Okay.

Republicans: Wait, no, not like that!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for the FBI to raid a certain Chicago home looking for the 30 million documents promised to be digitized.

This is such a galactically stupid post. So much so that I imagine it'll be worked into this weekend's talking points.

It's already been out there. I saw it on Facebook on Wednesday.
His failure to digitize the documents is not illegal because he had all of the right permissions to take them.

Oh! if you saw it on Facebook then it must be true!

Yes, PP saw the latest dumb whataboutism talking point on Facebook, and PP isn’t saying it’s true.