War with Iran

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: Iraqi’s using bulldozers in an attempt to storm the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad this morning!

lol…seem to be going well.


Maybe we can have a good old fashion hostage crisis! Trump is a yellow face clown.


Run Forrest, Run!



What's the point moron? No one with an IQ over 70 thinks that the Iranians have a superior military. Any cheering about military "wins" is like cheering for the Harlem Globetrotters beating the Washington Generals as winning an NBA championship. The US should win. They should be able to sink ships. People cheering as if this is a surprise are morons. It's one thing to be able to dunk on someone. It's another to do it for no reason and then gloat as if it's an achievement.

However... China, Korea, Viet Nam, Laos, Cambodia, Iraq, Afghanistan. That superior firepower literally was useless. All it did was kill millions of civilians and 100s of thousands of American soldiers. Every single time the outcome was a loss. Except for Korea, which has technically been at war for over 75 years now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


Define “success” in this case. Does it look like Venezuela or something different?


Success (at this point) = regime deposed, minimal civilian casualties or US military casualties, and a stable regime pit in place that allows the people of Iran the freedom, dignity and prosperity they deserve.

You disagree?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


Define “success” in this case. Does it look like Venezuela or something different?


Success (at this point) = regime deposed, minimal civilian casualties or US military casualties, and a stable regime pit in place that allows the people of Iran the freedom, dignity and prosperity they deserve.

You disagree?


Can I also get a unicorn?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


Define “success” in this case. Does it look like Venezuela or something different?


Success (at this point) = regime deposed, minimal civilian casualties or US military casualties, and a stable regime pit in place that allows the people of Iran the freedom, dignity and prosperity they deserve.

You disagree?


Can I also get a unicorn?


Post your address and I'll mail you a Hitachi Magicwand.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


Define “success” in this case. Does it look like Venezuela or something different?


Success (at this point) = regime deposed, minimal civilian casualties or US military casualties, and a stable regime pit in place that allows the people of Iran the freedom, dignity and prosperity they deserve.

You disagree?


Can I also get a unicorn?


Awww, a cooler-than-thou cynic. Cute, but inapposite.

I don’t think this will happen, but I certainly hope it does. You? Whose side are you on, exactly?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


Define “success” in this case. Does it look like Venezuela or something different?


Success (at this point) = regime deposed, minimal civilian casualties or US military casualties, and a stable regime pit in place that allows the people of Iran the freedom, dignity and prosperity they deserve.

You disagree?


DP...the bigger point is...do you actually think it will turn out like this?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:








Yes, no doubt the Iranian diaspora is overjoyed.


Isn't a lot of the diaspora from the families who were tight with the Shah? The ones who would like the crown prince back?
Kinds of like white Russians (displaces countesses and such) after the Russian Revolution and fascists in South America.


Correct. See also Cubans in Miami.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


Define “success” in this case. Does it look like Venezuela or something different?


Success (at this point) = regime deposed, minimal civilian casualties or US military casualties, and a stable regime pit in place that allows the people of Iran the freedom, dignity and prosperity they deserve.

You disagree?


Now tell me how often has a ‘stable regime’ that affords its civilians freedom, dignity and prosperity been put in place after another country has deposed of the previous regime.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


We're only 2 days into it, we've only taken out a few dozen of their leaders, they have layers and successors - and 99.99% of the regime change work is going to have to come from the Iranian people themselves.


True. And what cowards to tell a bunch of Iranians to go die fighting for a war that the US doesn't even intend on actually winning. This was supposed to be a quick Venezuela-style "win" to make an attempt to claim some achievement before the March primaries. Unfortunately for Chump, it's probably going to be pretty bad at the polls for the AIPAC/Chump candidates. The question is, will the markets tank tomorrow? And will gas prices spike in two days before the polls open?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hey left wingers: it’s ok to respect the feelings of the diaspora.


I was the original diaspora commenter - I respect their feelings. I’m also glad Khameini is dead.

Just don’t expect me to take those videos as proof that everyone is dancing in the streets and pro Trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


Define “success” in this case. Does it look like Venezuela or something different?


Success (at this point) = regime deposed, minimal civilian casualties or US military casualties, and a stable regime pit in place that allows the people of Iran the freedom, dignity and prosperity they deserve.

You disagree?


DP...the bigger point is...do you actually think it will turn out like this?


No. I’ve consistently said that I oppose this action (bc Trump, bc long term risks, bc Constitution, etc.).

But it’s done. And I find it revolting that people here are actually rooting for failure, which would be bad for both the US and the Iranian people.

Also politically unwise, since if the average American independent read half the crap on here, they’d pick up their pitchforks and torches. They might not like Trump, but they hate traitors more.

Lack of decency and patriotism is the cancer of the far left and it’s on full display in this thread.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


It ahs been barely 24 hours. There is no winning or losing at this juncture.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


Define “success” in this case. Does it look like Venezuela or something different?


Success (at this point) = regime deposed, minimal civilian casualties or US military casualties, and a stable regime pit in place that allows the people of Iran the freedom, dignity and prosperity they deserve.


I’m the pp. That all sounds good to me except that the regime has not been deposed. And who exactly is going to “put a stable regime in place”?
You disagree?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


Define “success” in this case. Does it look like Venezuela or something different?


Success (at this point) = regime deposed, minimal civilian casualties or US military casualties, and a stable regime pit in place that allows the people of Iran the freedom, dignity and prosperity they deserve.

You disagree?


Now tell me how often has a ‘stable regime’ that affords its civilians freedom, dignity and prosperity been put in place after another country has deposed of the previous regime.


A handful. But that’s not my point: I don’t think this is likely to succeed, but I hope it does.

Most of the nutters here agree on the first part, but actually hope that this fails.

That’s fundamentally unpatriotic, evil, and politically suicidal. So gross.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.


Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.

And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.

You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.


Define “success” in this case. Does it look like Venezuela or something different?


Success (at this point) = regime deposed, minimal civilian casualties or US military casualties, and a stable regime pit in place that allows the people of Iran the freedom, dignity and prosperity they deserve.

You disagree?


DP...the bigger point is...do you actually think it will turn out like this?


No. I’ve consistently said that I oppose this action (bc Trump, bc long term risks, bc Constitution, etc.).

But it’s done. And I find it revolting that people here are actually rooting for failure, which would be bad for both the US and the Iranian people.

Also politically unwise, since if the average American independent read half the crap on here, they’d pick up their pitchforks and torches. They might not like Trump, but they hate traitors more.

Lack of decency and patriotism is the cancer of the far left and it’s on full display in this thread.



No one is "rooting for failure" - but let's be real, we saw what happened in Vietnam, Korea, Iraq and Afghanistan. It isn't realistic to suggest lobbing a few bombs and taking out the head, when there are millions of troops and leadership ready to carry the mantle, is going to get the job done. And we know this administration is totally inept, ergo...
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: