|
For folks who don't know, MSDE passed a new policy and will be requiring 300 minutes of math a week in grades K-8 starting in 2027, which is way more than middle schools offer currently, and so will require big changes which will probably mean cuts to electives (possibly down to just one elective per year for middle schoolers), the end of block schedules, etc.
I was trying to figure out where this came from, and it looks like it's being pushed by ExcelinEd, the education group founded by Jeb Bush (he's chairman of the board and puts out press releases under the ExcelinEd name regularly, and other Republicans like Eric Cantor, Bruce Rauner, Susana Martinez, etc are on the board as well.) I don't see any notable advocacy on this from anywhere else. No other state has required this for middle schoolers (Alabama does for K-5) so and they are very excited that Maryland will be the first one. This is their fact sheet on it and if you search the web for mentions of this minimum math requirement, you'll see articles on a variety of websites but they all seem to be written by ExcelinEd staff and they all only ever link to this website when they assert that evidence supports this change. I'm also skeptical that the data they're pushing on this is even real. They say "Students in countries who consistently perform well on international math assessments have an average of 60 minutes per day (300 minutes per week) for math instruction" which, even if true, feels like a "correlation does not equal causation" issue... but they only ever link to this website, which is just a a listing of how many hours per year of math instruction 4th and 8th graders get around the world, and shows only two countries with middle schoolers averaging more than 180 hours a year/5 hours a week of math (more elementary schoolers are, so maybe this is true at the ES level.) In fact, the one article I found where they gave a little more detail ("But in Singapore, Japan, and Finland, students have a better understanding of foundational mathematical concepts as they enter young adulthood. All three of these high-performing countries have one thing in common: They mandate that schools dedicate at least an hour every day to math instruction") mentions 3 countries that, according to the TIMSS data they link, have far fewer annual math hours than the US for 8th graders-- for Finland and Japan just 105 and 111 hours per year! Unless there are other sources they are relying on but not sharing, it feels sloppy bordering on misleading. But even if it is indeed true that middle schoolers do better in math with more minutes per week (which is logical albeit maybe unproven), the question is still "At what cost?" It is hard to see how MCPS middle schools will add an extra 60-100 minutes of math a week without cutting back on electives, which may mean that middle schoolers will only have one elective period and would have to choose between foreign language and instrumental music, both of which are valuable in their own right (and other electives will probably shrink too if they're only an option for kids who want neither foreign language nor music.) Middle school immersion and magnets may be in trouble too, if participating kids would no longer be able to take any extra electives. I am personally very frustrated by this. (And annoyed that it doesn't look to me like it got much or any debate when it passed, probably because it was buried in the same math policy that changed the algebra/HS math pathways and made a bunch of other math changes.) Does anyone know if there are any efforts to lobby MSDE to reverse this requirement for middle school? And does anyone know if MCPS has taken a position on this change, or if we could lobby them to oppose it? |
| This is horrific we do not want this! |
| I think math education badly needs to be overhauled, but piling on minutes without changing the curriculum and methods won’t do anything. |
|
Yeah, this is concerning to me.
Clearly, math proficiency is abysmal, so something should be changed. But is "make math class longer" really the answer? First of all, doesn't this mean districts will need to hire more math teachers? You can't just make all of their classes 33% longer without changing their pay or other responsibilities, right? But rather than just increasing classroom time and crowding out electives, I'd rather see ideas like moving away from ineffective EdTech, focused tutoring, daily homework, etc. BTW, I don't think any association with Jeb Bush should be a reason to discount this. Bad ideas in education are bipartisan. |
| Is there a petition? Terrible idea. Fluency is not strong enough in younger grades. Work on that instead. |
| The continued problem with using other countries as the basis for making changes, is that holistic changes are not made. For example, less standardize testing before HS. Or nationalized K-12 curriculum and teachers training. etc. |
|
OP, kudos to you on your research and digging and the questions you've posed. These are all great points and unfortunately, it looks like no discussion was had because few people pay attention to what happens at the state level when it comes to education.
MCPS actually gets more press coverage than MSDE, even though MSDE is the boss of MCPS. |
So tired of 1st graders identifying which equations are being represented in a word problem when they can't even add fluently. |
It's not just an idea; it is happening I believe as of 2027-2028. -NP |
You are correct that it is a policy that passed and so it's currently on the books that schools will have to start offering the 60 minutes a day or 300 minutes a week of math in grades K-8 starting in 2027-2028 (the year after next, so when this year's 4th, 5th, and 6th graders are in middle school, and then for all grades below that as well.). But I don't think that means there's no chance of reversing it. It's a huge change that got very little attention, is unproven and novel, and has major negative consequences. I think it's worth someone starting a petition to MSDE as well as parents making efforts to press MCPS to lobby MSDE to roll it back. |
| They don’t need more time, they need a traditional curriculum. |
They need to teach them basics like math facts first. |
What major negative consequences? The policy has yet to be implemented so you can only speculate that there will be negative consequences. And the only one offered on this thread is potential cut in number of electives in the middle school which is not at all given as there are many ways to integrate this into curriculum while keeping two electives. The county has 36% math proficiency rate, lower than surrounding counties and quite frankly embarrassing. Math curriculum is so much watered down - elementary school kids are beating number bonds to death while their peers around the world are mastering real math concepts; middle school math is often covered so superficially that nothing sticks. And of all the education battles that we are facing these days, you chose to fight for less math. Thank you for bringing this to my attention so that I can throw my support behind it. I can care less what group and what former politicians are pushing for it. The county needs a major change in how it approaches math. We are approaching the point, if not already there, where the only way for a MCPS graduate to have decent math SAT score and a chance for college admission will be to supplement math education with AoPS or RSM. |
| Mykids would be a 3rd grader & 6th grader in 2027-2028. I have no ideas how many minutes of math they receive currently each day in class in ES. I still have no ideas what MS curriculum are even though I hear of terms of block schedule or electives all the time. Does taking more or less MS electives matter or what? For HS credit graduation or going to specific academic path? With all these recent changes in mcps boudary study and regional programs, my head are already confused to keep up. I am following this thread to learn more about it. |
|
Wait what? "will be requiring 300 minutes of math a week [an hour a day] in grades K-8 starting in 2027, which is way more than middle schools offer currently"
Why aren't middle schools offering an hour a day of math? Students in middle school are there from 8:15-3:00. That is 6 hours and 45 minutes. Why can't math be an hour a day? What also would be better would be to have actual math textbooks with WORKED EXAMPLES, direct instruction and workbooks like every other country that is highly ranked in math. |