Gaza War, Part 3

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:so- there are lunatics on the left.

There are far more racists who say they feel for the Palestinians but "jewish lives are sacred" and these people dont even realize that this is a racist thing to say. Herzl himself regarded the zionist project as a colonial project, you cannot consider yourself truly German and also indigenous to a Middle East your ancestors fled during the reign of Tiberius . These european jews felt that they were being forced out of Europe, so that whole argument falls apart. I agree with Miriam Margolyes's statement. The actions of Israelis- all of the ones who are jewish agree that not one loaf of bread should enter Gaza, 69 percent of Israelis/30 percent are Arab Israelis/ agree with a Middle Ages style blockade- dont jibe with the judaism that I have encountered in my life with its emphasis on empathy and healing the world.


Herzl was an extremist. Actually, many Jews were opposed to him in Europe and didn’t feel forced out of Europe in the 1800s and felt his idea of leaving Europe for Palestine was anti Semitic. They felt culturally and linguistically European and that going to create a colonial settlement in the Middle East would be doing what the anti Semites want.

His movement didn’t gain traction till after WW2/ the Holocaust . That’s when most Jews finally saw the need for Israel , but initially Jews were opposed to Herzls idea about creating an Israel in the Holy Land. They thought Jews were better off in every Middle Eastern country instead of just one .


Interesting. I've always thought the Zionist claim on Palestine due to being "the true indigenous people," based on having ancestors who lived there 2,000 years ago, was incredibly weak. If I were to demand some of "my" ancestral land in Ireland back because Oliver Cromwell stole it almost 400 years ago, I don't think I'd get very far.



The “Zionist” (a term that is incredibly anti-Semitic) claim is not that our right to Israel comes from anyone who lived there 2000 years ago.

Our claim is that the Jewish people have a history of residence in the area that is currently considered to be Israel (as well as the West Bank and Gaza) that stretches back thousands of years. Additionally, outside of periods where the land was under the control of invading nations (Romans, Turks, British, and most recently the Palestinians), the Jewish people have been the governing body of the land. They have a very strong claim, which is why they are recognized as the leaders of modern Israel, not Hamas.


Zionism is an acquisitive, expansionist, imperialist, racist, selfish, colonial, and genocidal ideology. Judaism is a religion. Stop trying to hijack the term "antisemitism" to justify the evil and supremacist philosophy of Zionism. That is in itself antisemitic. Judaism is not Zionism, and antisemitism is not anti-Zionism. You stain Judaism when you associate it with Zionism.

MANY people, including today's Palestinians, have a history of residence in what is currently considered to be Israel. Every one of us has a history of residence in Africa, which is where our species originated. Does that mean we can take over Ethiopia and evict the current indigenous people? Many of us have a history of residence in what is now Israel, as our ancestors lived in that land on their journey out of Africa. It was the first land traversed by ancient humans as they exited Africa. UN Resolution 181 was a terrible mistake. It should have been mitigated by UN Resolution 194, but Zionists, true to their overweening cultural narcissism, believe they can pick and choose which international laws suit them.

The land currently called Israel has been continuously inhabited by humans for possibly more than 100,000 years. It was certainly inhabited tens of thousands of years before Judaism was even invented. It has been conquered and re-conquered repeatedly. Why should one group that lived there 2,000 years ago and then left and mingled with other populations suddenly be given the region? If we were to apply that precedent the world over, there would be absolute chaos.

Do you ever stop to think of the rights of Palestinians, or do you consider them so ethnically inferior that they can simply be evicted or exterminated for the convenience of Zionists? Do you want to murder them all so you can build new settlements in Gaza or the West Bank before their bodies are cold? Many Palestinians are the descendants of people who lived in the region millennia before Judaism was invented. Some are descendants of Jews and had ancestors that converted to Islam or Christianity. In what world should THESE people suddenly lose their rights to invading hordes who had been absent for thousands of years and were as much native to Poland or Russia as to Palestine? During the Nakba, thousands of Palestinians were murdered, raped, and had their land and belongings stolen by Zionist invaders, and about three-quarters of a million of them were evicted from their homes, driven across borders, and murdered if they tried to revisit their homes. This is an absolutely despicable blot on human history. Israel should be doing what Germany does. It should admit it conducted genocide during the Nakba and is continuing to do so now and then redress the atrocities of its past. That is the way forward for all of us as we collectively come to terms with our primitive and bloodthirsty history and attempt to reinvent ourselves as ethical and equitable.

There is breathtaking irony in your attempts to weaponize "antisemitism" to allow the genocide of indigenous Palestinians. Breathtaking.


First, it is clear you do not understand the history of Israel.

Certainly there have been many different populations that called Israel home - the Egyptians, Romans, Turks, British, and Palestinians have all, at different times, emigrated into Israel, however the one constant over thousands of years has been that Jewish people. Unlike these invaders, who were historically drawn by the regions’ economic and environmental prosperity and the Jewish people’s hospitality, Jewish people have been consistently present in the region, and considered to be the sole native population, up until the last decade or so in which Iran and Palestinian Allie’s have spread the lie that Jews only entered Israel in the 1940s. This is not true, the Jewish identify was the primary, dominant culture in the region going back to thousands of years before the birth of Jesus, and were never fully removed from the area, as other cultures invaded, faded, were replaced, and shifted.

Of course I consider the right of Palestinians. As does Israel. Many Palestinians live in Israel with the same rights as any other Israeli, serve in the IDF, and support the current mission. The removal of Hamas is in the best interest of all innocent Palestinians. If you support Palestinians and Palestine, you should be strongly supporting Israel in its current mission, as their intentions and the intentions of innocent Palestinians are the same.

What many are misrepresenting as supporting Palestinians is actually supporting Hamas - calling for a ceasefire before Hamas is removed from power over the Palestinian people, calling for the reimplementation of the previous corrupt Humanitarian aid program so Hamas can continue to siphon off aid and sell it to support their war plans, etc… None of that is moving towards a better world where the Palestinian people. The reality you people refuse to accept is that the Palestinian people are far better off right now then they were on 10/6, and the reason for that is solely because Israel has intervened and is currently hard at work removing their oppressive Hamas overlords.


No one considers Jews the sole native population of the region. That’s your own personal wet dream.


Really? Tell that to the history books. Jewish people have had a long history in the region that goes back thousands of years without cessation, having lived in the region through many changes in the political leadership of the region. This was acknowledged back in the 1940s, and is one of the common lies of Hamas supporters, who are more then happy to ignore this history and pretend that Jewish people just suddenly appeared in Israel in the 1940s! Yes, there has been a large number of Jewish people who have since immigrated to Israel - because unlike Christianity and Islam which are dominant religions in dozens of nations, Judaism has one single nation that it holds on to precariously - but that does not take away the well established history of Jewish influence in the region.

It is also skewed by straight up anti-semites to imply that anyone who brings up this history is relying solely on the Torah and references to a Jewish state to establish this history, which is simply untrue. You see it all over this thread “OMG it’s the God literally gave Israel to the Jews poster!” Recognize that phrase? It’s basically thrown at every Israel supporter in this thread.

Yes, references in the Torah - as well as the Bible and other religious texts - certainly can help identify certain historical context to Israel - it is unarguable that there was a nation located generally in the region of Jerusalem that was politically and culturally Jewish that dates back thousands of years. We can also say, with relative certainty, that despite the region falling under Roman rule, at the time of Jesus there remained a significant Jewish population that held considerable social and economic power in the region.

But those notes have nothing to do with the decades of research demonstrating that, unlike the Hamas supporters would like you to think, Jews never all left Israel and have consistently remained a notable cultural group located within the area that comprises modern Israel, without the long period of exile that these folks Want you to imagine.

Don’t want to take my word for it?

https://bje.org.au/knowledge-centre/israel/history/historical-presence/

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/28/opinion/jewish-history-israel.html



One promoter of Palestinian terror I spoke to in college was only interested in these facts when I told him that Karl Marx did a census.


I said, “Here is what one of the greatest thinkers of the 19th century—some feel he is the greatest thinker of the 19th century—said in describing Jerusalem at that time.” After reading the passage from the Daily Tribune about the “4,000 Mussulmans, 8,000 Jews” of Jerusalem I added: “I am sure that our Soviet colleagues will immediately recognize that I am quoting Karl Marx.”

The Soviet delegate—plainly a crude apparatchik—jumped up and shouted, “Forgery! This is a forgery! Karl Marx never wrote this!” In response, I took up the volume from which I was quoting and asked that it be noted that I was using the official Moscow Foreign Languages Publishing House edition of Marx’s writings on colonialism, adding: “I am sure that our Soviet colleague is not suggesting that the official Soviet publishing house is falsifying the texts of Karl Marx.” The room exploded with laughter, although several attendees were less than amused.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:so- there are lunatics on the left.

There are far more racists who say they feel for the Palestinians but "jewish lives are sacred" and these people dont even realize that this is a racist thing to say. Herzl himself regarded the zionist project as a colonial project, you cannot consider yourself truly German and also indigenous to a Middle East your ancestors fled during the reign of Tiberius . These european jews felt that they were being forced out of Europe, so that whole argument falls apart. I agree with Miriam Margolyes's statement. The actions of Israelis- all of the ones who are jewish agree that not one loaf of bread should enter Gaza, 69 percent of Israelis/30 percent are Arab Israelis/ agree with a Middle Ages style blockade- dont jibe with the judaism that I have encountered in my life with its emphasis on empathy and healing the world.


Herzl was an extremist. Actually, many Jews were opposed to him in Europe and didn’t feel forced out of Europe in the 1800s and felt his idea of leaving Europe for Palestine was anti Semitic. They felt culturally and linguistically European and that going to create a colonial settlement in the Middle East would be doing what the anti Semites want.

His movement didn’t gain traction till after WW2/ the Holocaust . That’s when most Jews finally saw the need for Israel , but initially Jews were opposed to Herzls idea about creating an Israel in the Holy Land. They thought Jews were better off in every Middle Eastern country instead of just one .


Interesting. I've always thought the Zionist claim on Palestine due to being "the true indigenous people," based on having ancestors who lived there 2,000 years ago, was incredibly weak. If I were to demand some of "my" ancestral land in Ireland back because Oliver Cromwell stole it almost 400 years ago, I don't think I'd get very far.



The “Zionist” (a term that is incredibly anti-Semitic) claim is not that our right to Israel comes from anyone who lived there 2000 years ago.

Our claim is that the Jewish people have a history of residence in the area that is currently considered to be Israel (as well as the West Bank and Gaza) that stretches back thousands of years. Additionally, outside of periods where the land was under the control of invading nations (Romans, Turks, British, and most recently the Palestinians), the Jewish people have been the governing body of the land. They have a very strong claim, which is why they are recognized as the leaders of modern Israel, not Hamas.


Zionism is an acquisitive, expansionist, imperialist, racist, selfish, colonial, and genocidal ideology. Judaism is a religion. Stop trying to hijack the term "antisemitism" to justify the evil and supremacist philosophy of Zionism. That is in itself antisemitic. Judaism is not Zionism, and antisemitism is not anti-Zionism. You stain Judaism when you associate it with Zionism.

MANY people, including today's Palestinians, have a history of residence in what is currently considered to be Israel. Every one of us has a history of residence in Africa, which is where our species originated. Does that mean we can take over Ethiopia and evict the current indigenous people? Many of us have a history of residence in what is now Israel, as our ancestors lived in that land on their journey out of Africa. It was the first land traversed by ancient humans as they exited Africa. UN Resolution 181 was a terrible mistake. It should have been mitigated by UN Resolution 194, but Zionists, true to their overweening cultural narcissism, believe they can pick and choose which international laws suit them.

The land currently called Israel has been continuously inhabited by humans for possibly more than 100,000 years. It was certainly inhabited tens of thousands of years before Judaism was even invented. It has been conquered and re-conquered repeatedly. Why should one group that lived there 2,000 years ago and then left and mingled with other populations suddenly be given the region? If we were to apply that precedent the world over, there would be absolute chaos.

Do you ever stop to think of the rights of Palestinians, or do you consider them so ethnically inferior that they can simply be evicted or exterminated for the convenience of Zionists? Do you want to murder them all so you can build new settlements in Gaza or the West Bank before their bodies are cold? Many Palestinians are the descendants of people who lived in the region millennia before Judaism was invented. Some are descendants of Jews and had ancestors that converted to Islam or Christianity. In what world should THESE people suddenly lose their rights to invading hordes who had been absent for thousands of years and were as much native to Poland or Russia as to Palestine? During the Nakba, thousands of Palestinians were murdered, raped, and had their land and belongings stolen by Zionist invaders, and about three-quarters of a million of them were evicted from their homes, driven across borders, and murdered if they tried to revisit their homes. This is an absolutely despicable blot on human history. Israel should be doing what Germany does. It should admit it conducted genocide during the Nakba and is continuing to do so now and then redress the atrocities of its past. That is the way forward for all of us as we collectively come to terms with our primitive and bloodthirsty history and attempt to reinvent ourselves as ethical and equitable.

There is breathtaking irony in your attempts to weaponize "antisemitism" to allow the genocide of indigenous Palestinians. Breathtaking.


First, it is clear you do not understand the history of Israel.

Certainly there have been many different populations that called Israel home - the Egyptians, Romans, Turks, British, and Palestinians have all, at different times, emigrated into Israel, however the one constant over thousands of years has been that Jewish people. Unlike these invaders, who were historically drawn by the regions’ economic and environmental prosperity and the Jewish people’s hospitality, Jewish people have been consistently present in the region, and considered to be the sole native population, up until the last decade or so in which Iran and Palestinian Allie’s have spread the lie that Jews only entered Israel in the 1940s. This is not true, the Jewish identify was the primary, dominant culture in the region going back to thousands of years before the birth of Jesus, and were never fully removed from the area, as other cultures invaded, faded, were replaced, and shifted.

Of course I consider the right of Palestinians. As does Israel. Many Palestinians live in Israel with the same rights as any other Israeli, serve in the IDF, and support the current mission. The removal of Hamas is in the best interest of all innocent Palestinians. If you support Palestinians and Palestine, you should be strongly supporting Israel in its current mission, as their intentions and the intentions of innocent Palestinians are the same.

What many are misrepresenting as supporting Palestinians is actually supporting Hamas - calling for a ceasefire before Hamas is removed from power over the Palestinian people, calling for the reimplementation of the previous corrupt Humanitarian aid program so Hamas can continue to siphon off aid and sell it to support their war plans, etc… None of that is moving towards a better world where the Palestinian people. The reality you people refuse to accept is that the Palestinian people are far better off right now then they were on 10/6, and the reason for that is solely because Israel has intervened and is currently hard at work removing their oppressive Hamas overlords.


No one considers Jews the sole native population of the region. That’s your own personal wet dream.


Different poster. It's in the bible. Once again every has different standards for Jews than other minority groups.


Who cares about what’s in the Bible?


There is also copious archeological evidence.

Everyone loves ranting about indigenous peoples, especially from their living rooms, built on indigenous land. Except, when the indigenous people are Jews.


I can't believe I am engaging again, but these claims overlook the key fact that the genetic markers that tie Jews to the region ALSO tie the Palestinians. They are both descended from the ancient Canaanites. I guess you think that all those who follow Islam are outsiders to the region? but this is just not true.


All of the ancient graveyards in Palestine Bury toward Jerusalem not Mecca which means they were Jewish till fairly recently in history . Israel even destroys these graveyards because I guess destroying Jewish graves is just what you do when you’re a Jewish state. Centuries of Ottoman Muslim and British Christian rulers didn’t desecrate Jewish graves but the Jewish state does


Hamas didn’t destroy churches in Gaza, IDF did.
Under Hamas rule, the number of Christians in Gaza has dropped by 99%.


Gaza needs to be recognized for what it is a Ghetto. Specifically designed to isolate the Muslim Palestinians from the Christians. The reason being that prior to resettlement of Jews after WWII the largest land owner in Jerusalem was the Christian churches. Can’t justify killing the Christians so separate then from the Muslims and solve that problem. As for who was there first, well go back to the census prior to resettlement. Anyone who was resettled there from Europe and the years that have since followed should not have more rights than families that were there prior to that time regardless of religious beliefs. We don’t have to have a ridiculous argument over who was there first all the way back to Moses.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:so- there are lunatics on the left.

There are far more racists who say they feel for the Palestinians but "jewish lives are sacred" and these people dont even realize that this is a racist thing to say. Herzl himself regarded the zionist project as a colonial project, you cannot consider yourself truly German and also indigenous to a Middle East your ancestors fled during the reign of Tiberius . These european jews felt that they were being forced out of Europe, so that whole argument falls apart. I agree with Miriam Margolyes's statement. The actions of Israelis- all of the ones who are jewish agree that not one loaf of bread should enter Gaza, 69 percent of Israelis/30 percent are Arab Israelis/ agree with a Middle Ages style blockade- dont jibe with the judaism that I have encountered in my life with its emphasis on empathy and healing the world.


Herzl was an extremist. Actually, many Jews were opposed to him in Europe and didn’t feel forced out of Europe in the 1800s and felt his idea of leaving Europe for Palestine was anti Semitic. They felt culturally and linguistically European and that going to create a colonial settlement in the Middle East would be doing what the anti Semites want.

His movement didn’t gain traction till after WW2/ the Holocaust . That’s when most Jews finally saw the need for Israel , but initially Jews were opposed to Herzls idea about creating an Israel in the Holy Land. They thought Jews were better off in every Middle Eastern country instead of just one .


Interesting. I've always thought the Zionist claim on Palestine due to being "the true indigenous people," based on having ancestors who lived there 2,000 years ago, was incredibly weak. If I were to demand some of "my" ancestral land in Ireland back because Oliver Cromwell stole it almost 400 years ago, I don't think I'd get very far.



The “Zionist” (a term that is incredibly anti-Semitic) claim is not that our right to Israel comes from anyone who lived there 2000 years ago.

Our claim is that the Jewish people have a history of residence in the area that is currently considered to be Israel (as well as the West Bank and Gaza) that stretches back thousands of years. Additionally, outside of periods where the land was under the control of invading nations (Romans, Turks, British, and most recently the Palestinians), the Jewish people have been the governing body of the land. They have a very strong claim, which is why they are recognized as the leaders of modern Israel, not Hamas.


Zionism is an acquisitive, expansionist, imperialist, racist, selfish, colonial, and genocidal ideology. Judaism is a religion. Stop trying to hijack the term "antisemitism" to justify the evil and supremacist philosophy of Zionism. That is in itself antisemitic. Judaism is not Zionism, and antisemitism is not anti-Zionism. You stain Judaism when you associate it with Zionism.

MANY people, including today's Palestinians, have a history of residence in what is currently considered to be Israel. Every one of us has a history of residence in Africa, which is where our species originated. Does that mean we can take over Ethiopia and evict the current indigenous people? Many of us have a history of residence in what is now Israel, as our ancestors lived in that land on their journey out of Africa. It was the first land traversed by ancient humans as they exited Africa. UN Resolution 181 was a terrible mistake. It should have been mitigated by UN Resolution 194, but Zionists, true to their overweening cultural narcissism, believe they can pick and choose which international laws suit them.

The land currently called Israel has been continuously inhabited by humans for possibly more than 100,000 years. It was certainly inhabited tens of thousands of years before Judaism was even invented. It has been conquered and re-conquered repeatedly. Why should one group that lived there 2,000 years ago and then left and mingled with other populations suddenly be given the region? If we were to apply that precedent the world over, there would be absolute chaos.

Do you ever stop to think of the rights of Palestinians, or do you consider them so ethnically inferior that they can simply be evicted or exterminated for the convenience of Zionists? Do you want to murder them all so you can build new settlements in Gaza or the West Bank before their bodies are cold? Many Palestinians are the descendants of people who lived in the region millennia before Judaism was invented. Some are descendants of Jews and had ancestors that converted to Islam or Christianity. In what world should THESE people suddenly lose their rights to invading hordes who had been absent for thousands of years and were as much native to Poland or Russia as to Palestine? During the Nakba, thousands of Palestinians were murdered, raped, and had their land and belongings stolen by Zionist invaders, and about three-quarters of a million of them were evicted from their homes, driven across borders, and murdered if they tried to revisit their homes. This is an absolutely despicable blot on human history. Israel should be doing what Germany does. It should admit it conducted genocide during the Nakba and is continuing to do so now and then redress the atrocities of its past. That is the way forward for all of us as we collectively come to terms with our primitive and bloodthirsty history and attempt to reinvent ourselves as ethical and equitable.

There is breathtaking irony in your attempts to weaponize "antisemitism" to allow the genocide of indigenous Palestinians. Breathtaking.


First, it is clear you do not understand the history of Israel.

Certainly there have been many different populations that called Israel home - the Egyptians, Romans, Turks, British, and Palestinians have all, at different times, emigrated into Israel, however the one constant over thousands of years has been that Jewish people. Unlike these invaders, who were historically drawn by the regions’ economic and environmental prosperity and the Jewish people’s hospitality, Jewish people have been consistently present in the region, and considered to be the sole native population, up until the last decade or so in which Iran and Palestinian Allie’s have spread the lie that Jews only entered Israel in the 1940s. This is not true, the Jewish identify was the primary, dominant culture in the region going back to thousands of years before the birth of Jesus, and were never fully removed from the area, as other cultures invaded, faded, were replaced, and shifted.

Of course I consider the right of Palestinians. As does Israel. Many Palestinians live in Israel with the same rights as any other Israeli, serve in the IDF, and support the current mission. The removal of Hamas is in the best interest of all innocent Palestinians. If you support Palestinians and Palestine, you should be strongly supporting Israel in its current mission, as their intentions and the intentions of innocent Palestinians are the same.

What many are misrepresenting as supporting Palestinians is actually supporting Hamas - calling for a ceasefire before Hamas is removed from power over the Palestinian people, calling for the reimplementation of the previous corrupt Humanitarian aid program so Hamas can continue to siphon off aid and sell it to support their war plans, etc… None of that is moving towards a better world where the Palestinian people. The reality you people refuse to accept is that the Palestinian people are far better off right now then they were on 10/6, and the reason for that is solely because Israel has intervened and is currently hard at work removing their oppressive Hamas overlords.


No one considers Jews the sole native population of the region. That’s your own personal wet dream.


Really? Tell that to the history books. Jewish people have had a long history in the region that goes back thousands of years without cessation, having lived in the region through many changes in the political leadership of the region. This was acknowledged back in the 1940s, and is one of the common lies of Hamas supporters, who are more then happy to ignore this history and pretend that Jewish people just suddenly appeared in Israel in the 1940s! Yes, there has been a large number of Jewish people who have since immigrated to Israel - because unlike Christianity and Islam which are dominant religions in dozens of nations, Judaism has one single nation that it holds on to precariously - but that does not take away the well established history of Jewish influence in the region.

It is also skewed by straight up anti-semites to imply that anyone who brings up this history is relying solely on the Torah and references to a Jewish state to establish this history, which is simply untrue. You see it all over this thread “OMG it’s the God literally gave Israel to the Jews poster!” Recognize that phrase? It’s basically thrown at every Israel supporter in this thread.

Yes, references in the Torah - as well as the Bible and other religious texts - certainly can help identify certain historical context to Israel - it is unarguable that there was a nation located generally in the region of Jerusalem that was politically and culturally Jewish that dates back thousands of years. We can also say, with relative certainty, that despite the region falling under Roman rule, at the time of Jesus there remained a significant Jewish population that held considerable social and economic power in the region.

But those notes have nothing to do with the decades of research demonstrating that, unlike the Hamas supporters would like you to think, Jews never all left Israel and have consistently remained a notable cultural group located within the area that comprises modern Israel, without the long period of exile that these folks Want you to imagine.

Don’t want to take my word for it?

https://bje.org.au/knowledge-centre/israel/history/historical-presence/

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/28/opinion/jewish-history-israel.html



Nice stream of bs but that’s not what you said. You said “Jews are recognized as the sole native population of the region. “ And that’s a lie.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And all they built with all that aid were terror tunnels while they leave their citizens as human shields. You can tell who the good guys are when the Israeli army protects their people in shelters, while the Hamas hides in shelters and lets their people suffer.

Sad state of affairs when you know Hamas will care less about protecting their own civilians than you do.


You can tell who the slow ones are. They didn’t built tunnels because they wanted to. They did it because they had to.

Otherwise, there would be no supplies. Israel has blocked everything from makeup, insulin, to chocolate or desserts into Gaza. They have them on what’s called a Starvation+ diet. Many Gazan kids have never known what a full belly feels like even before this war.

Is it all Israel’s fault? No, Hamas and their wealth grubbing leadership in Qatar are also largely to blame. But that’s exactly why 10/7 happened. Sinwar was able to lead a January 6th esque rebellion by telling his foot soldiers the exiled Hamas is corrupt and so is Israel


Israel needs to search the aid that comes in because too often there are weapons hidden within these trucks and supplies. They allow it in once the verify there are no weapons to kill people with.


There are weapons in chocolate bars , hypertension medication, wheelchairs and insulin?

The weapon or anti weapon defense system is the tunnels. That’s Hamas Iron Dome. Israel should’ve blown up the tunnels and allowed general items in to to Gaza via land and sea import. By cutting Gaza off, the Israelis unintentionally created their own dilemma with the booby trapped tunnels. Sinwars brother was even driving inside one of these tunnels . Hostages have said they had TV’s , full bathroom plumbing, and even saw air conditioning in the tunnels . This isn’t some fly by night project . Israel had to have known all this was going on
Anonymous
What’s that saying? Necessity is the mother of invention.

The tunnels however are the biggest problem . They ensure that Israel won’t be able to successfully annex Gaza ever again because they can’t be sure every underground Hamas bunker , booby trap, or tunnel can be blown up . Israel takes one step forward and seven steps back. Much like the settlements in the West Bank, the full import and export blockade of Gaza led to the creation of an underground tunnel system that harms Israel more than it helps
Anonymous
An expert in the IdF said they didn’t think Hamas would be “smart enough” to create such a vast, extensive tunnel system. Well, no shit. It’s 5 miles wide at its widest point.

Building tunnels throughout the strip ala Manhattan subways is not difficult to any halfway decent engineer. Smuggling concrete, steel, drywall, electrical wiring and other items from Egypt is not difficult . All they need to do is make one Egyptian police /army friend sympathetic to Palestine and that isn’t hard.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Gaza Strip is only about 5 miles wide. Not very fertile for farmland. It’s the worst piece of land (the deserts and kibbutz by Gaza aren’t that great either which is probably why Israel put the Bedouins there) but Hamas were able to urbanize it and use tunnels for imports since there is a sea blockade, international sanctions, and they can’t build ports.

Hamas with no resource or money built some better infrastructure in Gaza than in rural Southern Israel


What does a sea blockade have to do with tunnels? Do they go to Italy?


Bless your heart.

No, but they go to Egypt to get supplies that come from Italy . If all the US ports were closed, the stores would be empty within weeks


You don't have to go by sea to get from Egypt to Gaza.


You still don’t get it .

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:so- there are lunatics on the left.

There are far more racists who say they feel for the Palestinians but "jewish lives are sacred" and these people dont even realize that this is a racist thing to say. Herzl himself regarded the zionist project as a colonial project, you cannot consider yourself truly German and also indigenous to a Middle East your ancestors fled during the reign of Tiberius . These european jews felt that they were being forced out of Europe, so that whole argument falls apart. I agree with Miriam Margolyes's statement. The actions of Israelis- all of the ones who are jewish agree that not one loaf of bread should enter Gaza, 69 percent of Israelis/30 percent are Arab Israelis/ agree with a Middle Ages style blockade- dont jibe with the judaism that I have encountered in my life with its emphasis on empathy and healing the world.


Herzl was an extremist. Actually, many Jews were opposed to him in Europe and didn’t feel forced out of Europe in the 1800s and felt his idea of leaving Europe for Palestine was anti Semitic. They felt culturally and linguistically European and that going to create a colonial settlement in the Middle East would be doing what the anti Semites want.

His movement didn’t gain traction till after WW2/ the Holocaust . That’s when most Jews finally saw the need for Israel , but initially Jews were opposed to Herzls idea about creating an Israel in the Holy Land. They thought Jews were better off in every Middle Eastern country instead of just one .


Interesting. I've always thought the Zionist claim on Palestine due to being "the true indigenous people," based on having ancestors who lived there 2,000 years ago, was incredibly weak. If I were to demand some of "my" ancestral land in Ireland back because Oliver Cromwell stole it almost 400 years ago, I don't think I'd get very far.



The “Zionist” (a term that is incredibly anti-Semitic) claim is not that our right to Israel comes from anyone who lived there 2000 years ago.

Our claim is that the Jewish people have a history of residence in the area that is currently considered to be Israel (as well as the West Bank and Gaza) that stretches back thousands of years. Additionally, outside of periods where the land was under the control of invading nations (Romans, Turks, British, and most recently the Palestinians), the Jewish people have been the governing body of the land. They have a very strong claim, which is why they are recognized as the leaders of modern Israel, not Hamas.


Zionism is an acquisitive, expansionist, imperialist, racist, selfish, colonial, and genocidal ideology. Judaism is a religion. Stop trying to hijack the term "antisemitism" to justify the evil and supremacist philosophy of Zionism. That is in itself antisemitic. Judaism is not Zionism, and antisemitism is not anti-Zionism. You stain Judaism when you associate it with Zionism.

MANY people, including today's Palestinians, have a history of residence in what is currently considered to be Israel. Every one of us has a history of residence in Africa, which is where our species originated. Does that mean we can take over Ethiopia and evict the current indigenous people? Many of us have a history of residence in what is now Israel, as our ancestors lived in that land on their journey out of Africa. It was the first land traversed by ancient humans as they exited Africa. UN Resolution 181 was a terrible mistake. It should have been mitigated by UN Resolution 194, but Zionists, true to their overweening cultural narcissism, believe they can pick and choose which international laws suit them.

The land currently called Israel has been continuously inhabited by humans for possibly more than 100,000 years. It was certainly inhabited tens of thousands of years before Judaism was even invented. It has been conquered and re-conquered repeatedly. Why should one group that lived there 2,000 years ago and then left and mingled with other populations suddenly be given the region? If we were to apply that precedent the world over, there would be absolute chaos.

Do you ever stop to think of the rights of Palestinians, or do you consider them so ethnically inferior that they can simply be evicted or exterminated for the convenience of Zionists? Do you want to murder them all so you can build new settlements in Gaza or the West Bank before their bodies are cold? Many Palestinians are the descendants of people who lived in the region millennia before Judaism was invented. Some are descendants of Jews and had ancestors that converted to Islam or Christianity. In what world should THESE people suddenly lose their rights to invading hordes who had been absent for thousands of years and were as much native to Poland or Russia as to Palestine? During the Nakba, thousands of Palestinians were murdered, raped, and had their land and belongings stolen by Zionist invaders, and about three-quarters of a million of them were evicted from their homes, driven across borders, and murdered if they tried to revisit their homes. This is an absolutely despicable blot on human history. Israel should be doing what Germany does. It should admit it conducted genocide during the Nakba and is continuing to do so now and then redress the atrocities of its past. That is the way forward for all of us as we collectively come to terms with our primitive and bloodthirsty history and attempt to reinvent ourselves as ethical and equitable.

There is breathtaking irony in your attempts to weaponize "antisemitism" to allow the genocide of indigenous Palestinians. Breathtaking.


First, it is clear you do not understand the history of Israel.

Certainly there have been many different populations that called Israel home - the Egyptians, Romans, Turks, British, and Palestinians have all, at different times, emigrated into Israel, however the one constant over thousands of years has been that Jewish people. Unlike these invaders, who were historically drawn by the regions’ economic and environmental prosperity and the Jewish people’s hospitality, Jewish people have been consistently present in the region, and considered to be the sole native population, up until the last decade or so in which Iran and Palestinian Allie’s have spread the lie that Jews only entered Israel in the 1940s. This is not true, the Jewish identify was the primary, dominant culture in the region going back to thousands of years before the birth of Jesus, and were never fully removed from the area, as other cultures invaded, faded, were replaced, and shifted.

Of course I consider the right of Palestinians. As does Israel. Many Palestinians live in Israel with the same rights as any other Israeli, serve in the IDF, and support the current mission. The removal of Hamas is in the best interest of all innocent Palestinians. If you support Palestinians and Palestine, you should be strongly supporting Israel in its current mission, as their intentions and the intentions of innocent Palestinians are the same.

What many are misrepresenting as supporting Palestinians is actually supporting Hamas - calling for a ceasefire before Hamas is removed from power over the Palestinian people, calling for the reimplementation of the previous corrupt Humanitarian aid program so Hamas can continue to siphon off aid and sell it to support their war plans, etc… None of that is moving towards a better world where the Palestinian people. The reality you people refuse to accept is that the Palestinian people are far better off right now then they were on 10/6, and the reason for that is solely because Israel has intervened and is currently hard at work removing their oppressive Hamas overlords.


No one considers Jews the sole native population of the region. That’s your own personal wet dream.


Different poster. It's in the bible. Once again every has different standards for Jews than other minority groups.


A lot of things are "in the bible." Do you think Adam and Eve were real people? Or that God created the Earth in seven days? Or that you can't wear a garment made of two different types of material? One can follow a biblical religion while accepting that the Bible is not historically or scientifically accurate.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:so- there are lunatics on the left.

There are far more racists who say they feel for the Palestinians but "jewish lives are sacred" and these people dont even realize that this is a racist thing to say. Herzl himself regarded the zionist project as a colonial project, you cannot consider yourself truly German and also indigenous to a Middle East your ancestors fled during the reign of Tiberius . These european jews felt that they were being forced out of Europe, so that whole argument falls apart. I agree with Miriam Margolyes's statement. The actions of Israelis- all of the ones who are jewish agree that not one loaf of bread should enter Gaza, 69 percent of Israelis/30 percent are Arab Israelis/ agree with a Middle Ages style blockade- dont jibe with the judaism that I have encountered in my life with its emphasis on empathy and healing the world.


Herzl was an extremist. Actually, many Jews were opposed to him in Europe and didn’t feel forced out of Europe in the 1800s and felt his idea of leaving Europe for Palestine was anti Semitic. They felt culturally and linguistically European and that going to create a colonial settlement in the Middle East would be doing what the anti Semites want.

His movement didn’t gain traction till after WW2/ the Holocaust . That’s when most Jews finally saw the need for Israel , but initially Jews were opposed to Herzls idea about creating an Israel in the Holy Land. They thought Jews were better off in every Middle Eastern country instead of just one .


Interesting. I've always thought the Zionist claim on Palestine due to being "the true indigenous people," based on having ancestors who lived there 2,000 years ago, was incredibly weak. If I were to demand some of "my" ancestral land in Ireland back because Oliver Cromwell stole it almost 400 years ago, I don't think I'd get very far.



The “Zionist” (a term that is incredibly anti-Semitic) claim is not that our right to Israel comes from anyone who lived there 2000 years ago.

Our claim is that the Jewish people have a history of residence in the area that is currently considered to be Israel (as well as the West Bank and Gaza) that stretches back thousands of years. Additionally, outside of periods where the land was under the control of invading nations (Romans, Turks, British, and most recently the Palestinians), the Jewish people have been the governing body of the land. They have a very strong claim, which is why they are recognized as the leaders of modern Israel, not Hamas.


Zionism is an acquisitive, expansionist, imperialist, racist, selfish, colonial, and genocidal ideology. Judaism is a religion. Stop trying to hijack the term "antisemitism" to justify the evil and supremacist philosophy of Zionism. That is in itself antisemitic. Judaism is not Zionism, and antisemitism is not anti-Zionism. You stain Judaism when you associate it with Zionism.

MANY people, including today's Palestinians, have a history of residence in what is currently considered to be Israel. Every one of us has a history of residence in Africa, which is where our species originated. Does that mean we can take over Ethiopia and evict the current indigenous people? Many of us have a history of residence in what is now Israel, as our ancestors lived in that land on their journey out of Africa. It was the first land traversed by ancient humans as they exited Africa. UN Resolution 181 was a terrible mistake. It should have been mitigated by UN Resolution 194, but Zionists, true to their overweening cultural narcissism, believe they can pick and choose which international laws suit them.

The land currently called Israel has been continuously inhabited by humans for possibly more than 100,000 years. It was certainly inhabited tens of thousands of years before Judaism was even invented. It has been conquered and re-conquered repeatedly. Why should one group that lived there 2,000 years ago and then left and mingled with other populations suddenly be given the region? If we were to apply that precedent the world over, there would be absolute chaos.

Do you ever stop to think of the rights of Palestinians, or do you consider them so ethnically inferior that they can simply be evicted or exterminated for the convenience of Zionists? Do you want to murder them all so you can build new settlements in Gaza or the West Bank before their bodies are cold? Many Palestinians are the descendants of people who lived in the region millennia before Judaism was invented. Some are descendants of Jews and had ancestors that converted to Islam or Christianity. In what world should THESE people suddenly lose their rights to invading hordes who had been absent for thousands of years and were as much native to Poland or Russia as to Palestine? During the Nakba, thousands of Palestinians were murdered, raped, and had their land and belongings stolen by Zionist invaders, and about three-quarters of a million of them were evicted from their homes, driven across borders, and murdered if they tried to revisit their homes. This is an absolutely despicable blot on human history. Israel should be doing what Germany does. It should admit it conducted genocide during the Nakba and is continuing to do so now and then redress the atrocities of its past. That is the way forward for all of us as we collectively come to terms with our primitive and bloodthirsty history and attempt to reinvent ourselves as ethical and equitable.

There is breathtaking irony in your attempts to weaponize "antisemitism" to allow the genocide of indigenous Palestinians. Breathtaking.


First, it is clear you do not understand the history of Israel.

Certainly there have been many different populations that called Israel home - the Egyptians, Romans, Turks, British, and Palestinians have all, at different times, emigrated into Israel, however the one constant over thousands of years has been that Jewish people. Unlike these invaders, who were historically drawn by the regions’ economic and environmental prosperity and the Jewish people’s hospitality, Jewish people have been consistently present in the region, and considered to be the sole native population, up until the last decade or so in which Iran and Palestinian Allie’s have spread the lie that Jews only entered Israel in the 1940s. This is not true, the Jewish identify was the primary, dominant culture in the region going back to thousands of years before the birth of Jesus, and were never fully removed from the area, as other cultures invaded, faded, were replaced, and shifted.

Of course I consider the right of Palestinians. As does Israel. Many Palestinians live in Israel with the same rights as any other Israeli, serve in the IDF, and support the current mission. The removal of Hamas is in the best interest of all innocent Palestinians. If you support Palestinians and Palestine, you should be strongly supporting Israel in its current mission, as their intentions and the intentions of innocent Palestinians are the same.

What many are misrepresenting as supporting Palestinians is actually supporting Hamas - calling for a ceasefire before Hamas is removed from power over the Palestinian people, calling for the reimplementation of the previous corrupt Humanitarian aid program so Hamas can continue to siphon off aid and sell it to support their war plans, etc… None of that is moving towards a better world where the Palestinian people. The reality you people refuse to accept is that the Palestinian people are far better off right now then they were on 10/6, and the reason for that is solely because Israel has intervened and is currently hard at work removing their oppressive Hamas overlords.


No one considers Jews the sole native population of the region. That’s your own personal wet dream.


Really? Tell that to the history books. Jewish people have had a long history in the region that goes back thousands of years without cessation, having lived in the region through many changes in the political leadership of the region. This was acknowledged back in the 1940s, and is one of the common lies of Hamas supporters, who are more then happy to ignore this history and pretend that Jewish people just suddenly appeared in Israel in the 1940s! Yes, there has been a large number of Jewish people who have since immigrated to Israel - because unlike Christianity and Islam which are dominant religions in dozens of nations, Judaism has one single nation that it holds on to precariously - but that does not take away the well established history of Jewish influence in the region.

It is also skewed by straight up anti-semites to imply that anyone who brings up this history is relying solely on the Torah and references to a Jewish state to establish this history, which is simply untrue. You see it all over this thread “OMG it’s the God literally gave Israel to the Jews poster!” Recognize that phrase? It’s basically thrown at every Israel supporter in this thread.

Yes, references in the Torah - as well as the Bible and other religious texts - certainly can help identify certain historical context to Israel - it is unarguable that there was a nation located generally in the region of Jerusalem that was politically and culturally Jewish that dates back thousands of years. We can also say, with relative certainty, that despite the region falling under Roman rule, at the time of Jesus there remained a significant Jewish population that held considerable social and economic power in the region.

But those notes have nothing to do with the decades of research demonstrating that, unlike the Hamas supporters would like you to think, Jews never all left Israel and have consistently remained a notable cultural group located within the area that comprises modern Israel, without the long period of exile that these folks Want you to imagine.

Don’t want to take my word for it?

https://bje.org.au/knowledge-centre/israel/history/historical-presence/

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/28/opinion/jewish-history-israel.html



Nobody is disputing that Jews lived in the area in ancient times. However, to claim this somehow entitles Jewish people of today to return and evict others who have lived there for 2,000 years longer doesn't pass the credibility test. It's like claiming a naked king is dressed in the finest robes, which works until someone points out the obvious and announces that "the king has no clothes." Many kingdoms have risen and fallen over the centuries, but nobody in their right mind should try to reclaim land some of their ancestors may have lived on many centuries ago. Note that Canaan had been inhabited for thousands of years before Judaism was even invented.

Some claim Judaism began in about 1800 BCE with God's covenant with Abraham. There is no evidence that Abraham ever existed, and this story is almost certainly mythological. Others believe that Judaism began somewhere between the 12th and 11th centuries BCE as an offshoot of the polytheistic Caananite religion, which had El as its supreme god but worshipped other deities, such as Astarte and Baal. Judaism began as Yahwaism around this time and its followers worshipped Yahweh, the god of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah. There is little agreement as to whether Yahwah was El, a son of El, or something else entirely, but Yahwaism began as monolatristic and only really evolved into monotheism toward the end of the Babylonian captivity in around 538 BCE. At that time, some Jews returned to Judah but most remained in Babylon. Later still, others traveled to Judah with Ezra. Throughout all this, tribes of different religions assimilated one another through conquest. Many Jews than left the region during and shortly after the Jewish-Roman wars, which took place between 66 and 135 CE.

If we date the start of Judaism to the 12th century BCE, Jews lived in Canaan/Palestine/Israel from as early as 1200 BCE to, say, 135 CE, a period of 1335 years. Jews were not a homogenous unit throughout this time. Their religion evolved, they mingled with people of other religions (often by conquest), some moved to other areas voluntarily before the Jewish-Roman wars, and they descended from the same stock as other groups in the region. After they left the region, they mingled with people in North Africa and Europe. Now, in 2024, this land has been occupied for at least 10,000 years. No slight intended to Jews, but evicting Palestinians whose families have lived continuously in the area for 10,000 years and giving their land to people who may have had some ancestors that lived there, albeit for a shorter time, is ... obviously very unfair to the Palestinians.




Anonymous
And if you're really all about ancestral lands, then guess what, Armenians lived in Artsakh for centuries, but that didn't keep Israel from supplying Azeris with top notch weapons to help them expel the natives.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And if you're really all about ancestral lands, then guess what, Armenians lived in Artsakh for centuries, but that didn't keep Israel from supplying Azeris with top notch weapons to help them expel the natives.


DP.

I agree that claims to ancestral lands are unworkable.

Which is why Palestinians have no claim to Israel, since they last inhabited it > 80 years ago.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And if you're really all about ancestral lands, then guess what, Armenians lived in Artsakh for centuries, but that didn't keep Israel from supplying Azeris with top notch weapons to help them expel the natives.


DP.

I agree that claims to ancestral lands are unworkable.

Which is why Palestinians have no claim to Israel, since they last inhabited it > 80 years ago.


You can hear the hand-rubbing through the internet.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:so- there are lunatics on the left.

There are far more racists who say they feel for the Palestinians but "jewish lives are sacred" and these people dont even realize that this is a racist thing to say. Herzl himself regarded the zionist project as a colonial project, you cannot consider yourself truly German and also indigenous to a Middle East your ancestors fled during the reign of Tiberius . These european jews felt that they were being forced out of Europe, so that whole argument falls apart. I agree with Miriam Margolyes's statement. The actions of Israelis- all of the ones who are jewish agree that not one loaf of bread should enter Gaza, 69 percent of Israelis/30 percent are Arab Israelis/ agree with a Middle Ages style blockade- dont jibe with the judaism that I have encountered in my life with its emphasis on empathy and healing the world.


Herzl was an extremist. Actually, many Jews were opposed to him in Europe and didn’t feel forced out of Europe in the 1800s and felt his idea of leaving Europe for Palestine was anti Semitic. They felt culturally and linguistically European and that going to create a colonial settlement in the Middle East would be doing what the anti Semites want.

His movement didn’t gain traction till after WW2/ the Holocaust . That’s when most Jews finally saw the need for Israel , but initially Jews were opposed to Herzls idea about creating an Israel in the Holy Land. They thought Jews were better off in every Middle Eastern country instead of just one .


Interesting. I've always thought the Zionist claim on Palestine due to being "the true indigenous people," based on having ancestors who lived there 2,000 years ago, was incredibly weak. If I were to demand some of "my" ancestral land in Ireland back because Oliver Cromwell stole it almost 400 years ago, I don't think I'd get very far.



The “Zionist” (a term that is incredibly anti-Semitic) claim is not that our right to Israel comes from anyone who lived there 2000 years ago.

Our claim is that the Jewish people have a history of residence in the area that is currently considered to be Israel (as well as the West Bank and Gaza) that stretches back thousands of years. Additionally, outside of periods where the land was under the control of invading nations (Romans, Turks, British, and most recently the Palestinians), the Jewish people have been the governing body of the land. They have a very strong claim, which is why they are recognized as the leaders of modern Israel, not Hamas.


Zionism is an acquisitive, expansionist, imperialist, racist, selfish, colonial, and genocidal ideology. Judaism is a religion. Stop trying to hijack the term "antisemitism" to justify the evil and supremacist philosophy of Zionism. That is in itself antisemitic. Judaism is not Zionism, and antisemitism is not anti-Zionism. You stain Judaism when you associate it with Zionism.

MANY people, including today's Palestinians, have a history of residence in what is currently considered to be Israel. Every one of us has a history of residence in Africa, which is where our species originated. Does that mean we can take over Ethiopia and evict the current indigenous people? Many of us have a history of residence in what is now Israel, as our ancestors lived in that land on their journey out of Africa. It was the first land traversed by ancient humans as they exited Africa. UN Resolution 181 was a terrible mistake. It should have been mitigated by UN Resolution 194, but Zionists, true to their overweening cultural narcissism, believe they can pick and choose which international laws suit them.

The land currently called Israel has been continuously inhabited by humans for possibly more than 100,000 years. It was certainly inhabited tens of thousands of years before Judaism was even invented. It has been conquered and re-conquered repeatedly. Why should one group that lived there 2,000 years ago and then left and mingled with other populations suddenly be given the region? If we were to apply that precedent the world over, there would be absolute chaos.

Do you ever stop to think of the rights of Palestinians, or do you consider them so ethnically inferior that they can simply be evicted or exterminated for the convenience of Zionists? Do you want to murder them all so you can build new settlements in Gaza or the West Bank before their bodies are cold? Many Palestinians are the descendants of people who lived in the region millennia before Judaism was invented. Some are descendants of Jews and had ancestors that converted to Islam or Christianity. In what world should THESE people suddenly lose their rights to invading hordes who had been absent for thousands of years and were as much native to Poland or Russia as to Palestine? During the Nakba, thousands of Palestinians were murdered, raped, and had their land and belongings stolen by Zionist invaders, and about three-quarters of a million of them were evicted from their homes, driven across borders, and murdered if they tried to revisit their homes. This is an absolutely despicable blot on human history. Israel should be doing what Germany does. It should admit it conducted genocide during the Nakba and is continuing to do so now and then redress the atrocities of its past. That is the way forward for all of us as we collectively come to terms with our primitive and bloodthirsty history and attempt to reinvent ourselves as ethical and equitable.

There is breathtaking irony in your attempts to weaponize "antisemitism" to allow the genocide of indigenous Palestinians. Breathtaking.


First, it is clear you do not understand the history of Israel.

Certainly there have been many different populations that called Israel home - the Egyptians, Romans, Turks, British, and Palestinians have all, at different times, emigrated into Israel, however the one constant over thousands of years has been that Jewish people. Unlike these invaders, who were historically drawn by the regions’ economic and environmental prosperity and the Jewish people’s hospitality, Jewish people have been consistently present in the region, and considered to be the sole native population, up until the last decade or so in which Iran and Palestinian Allie’s have spread the lie that Jews only entered Israel in the 1940s. This is not true, the Jewish identify was the primary, dominant culture in the region going back to thousands of years before the birth of Jesus, and were never fully removed from the area, as other cultures invaded, faded, were replaced, and shifted.

Of course I consider the right of Palestinians. As does Israel. Many Palestinians live in Israel with the same rights as any other Israeli, serve in the IDF, and support the current mission. The removal of Hamas is in the best interest of all innocent Palestinians. If you support Palestinians and Palestine, you should be strongly supporting Israel in its current mission, as their intentions and the intentions of innocent Palestinians are the same.

What many are misrepresenting as supporting Palestinians is actually supporting Hamas - calling for a ceasefire before Hamas is removed from power over the Palestinian people, calling for the reimplementation of the previous corrupt Humanitarian aid program so Hamas can continue to siphon off aid and sell it to support their war plans, etc… None of that is moving towards a better world where the Palestinian people. The reality you people refuse to accept is that the Palestinian people are far better off right now then they were on 10/6, and the reason for that is solely because Israel has intervened and is currently hard at work removing their oppressive Hamas overlords.


No one considers Jews the sole native population of the region. That’s your own personal wet dream.


Different poster. It's in the bible. Once again every has different standards for Jews than other minority groups.


the Bible? the book I read as part of my English lit course in 9th grade (at Catholic school run by nuns mind you) wtf authority does that have? do we also have to listen to the vedas, the creation myths of the Shawnee know? anansi the offing spider? Zues & Kronos? this isn't a rick riordan book its real life and noone should care about what was written in a book 1000s of years ago. I say this a s areligious person who prayed everyday but that has nothing to do with geopolitical realities and what's happening today. Should we also be marrying widows off to their brothers in law? Stoning adulterers? Stoning Anderson Cooper- that is what the Bible says to do. you cant pick and choose-it's either the word of god or its not.
Anonymous
Arrest them all and charge them with obstruction of passage. Levy large fines.
Drivers should sue the damn city for not removing these imbeciles promptly.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And if you're really all about ancestral lands, then guess what, Armenians lived in Artsakh for centuries, but that didn't keep Israel from supplying Azeris with top notch weapons to help them expel the natives.


DP.

I agree that claims to ancestral lands are unworkable.

Which is why Palestinians have no claim to Israel, since they last inhabited it > 80 years ago.


Actually, under UN Resolution 194, they do. They can either return to their homes or receive compensation. And in the case of Palestinians, we're not talking only about "ancestral lands," as in the lands of their ancestors. We're talking about their OWN lands, where they lived as young children and from which their parents and grandparents were evicted (or murdered) by Zionist terrorists (like the Irgun and Alexandroni Brigade) and the IDF. Also, it's under 80 years for many of those evicted during the Nakba. 80 years is very different from 2,000 years.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: