NYT expose on The Tell by Amy Griffin

Anonymous
Anyone read today’s NYT article attempting to blow up Amy Griffin’s grift? Always had a funny feeling about her and this book.

Anonymous
Can you post a gift link?
Anonymous
I had assumed that by now Oprah would have been better about sniffing out a fake story.
Anonymous
In a nutshell, can you describe the book and why it’s controversial? Your subject title intrigued me.
Anonymous
I read the article. I was completely unaware of her and her book. Although she graduated from UVA the same year as me—I guess I’ve been living under a rock.

The whole thing sounds completely ridiculous, though, and I feel bad for the accused teacher. Can’t these billionaires just enjoy their bounty quietly somewhere. So many of them are hell bent on destroying regular people’s lives.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:In a nutshell, can you describe the book and why it’s controversial? Your subject title intrigued me.


I'm not OP but I did read the book. In a nutshull, the author took psychadelics in therapy and through that experience claims to have uncovered long-repressed memories of her being SAed when she was in high school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In a nutshell, can you describe the book and why it’s controversial? Your subject title intrigued me.


I'm not OP but I did read the book. In a nutshull, the author took psychadelics in therapy and through that experience claims to have uncovered long-repressed memories of her being SAed when she was in high school.


Oh wait, slight correction, it started when she was in middle school. It's been a while since I read the book!

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In a nutshell, can you describe the book and why it’s controversial? Your subject title intrigued me.


I'm not OP but I did read the book. In a nutshull, the author took psychadelics in therapy and through that experience claims to have uncovered long-repressed memories of her being SAed when she was in high school.


Thank you I never read the book but I remember hearing about it!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In a nutshell, can you describe the book and why it’s controversial? Your subject title intrigued me.


I'm not OP but I did read the book. In a nutshull, the author took psychadelics in therapy and through that experience claims to have uncovered long-repressed memories of her being SAed when she was in high school.


I think it was middle school, but was it true. That's what I don't get.

And she's a billionaire why make it up.

I guess I'm confused is it a grift or what is the expose about.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In a nutshell, can you describe the book and why it’s controversial? Your subject title intrigued me.


I'm not OP but I did read the book. In a nutshull, the author took psychadelics in therapy and through that experience claims to have uncovered long-repressed memories of her being SAed when she was in high school.


I think it was middle school, but was it true. That's what I don't get.

And she's a billionaire why make it up.

I guess I'm confused is it a grift or what is the expose about.


If she’s a billionaire, why write a book about it? Deal with it privately.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:In a nutshell, can you describe the book and why it’s controversial? Your subject title intrigued me.

The author went from a wealthy, privileged childhood to an even more wealthy and privileged adulthood. She wondered what made her feel like she had to be perfect all the time. Her husband had a significant financial stake in a business that was promoting the use of psychedelic drugs by patients in therapy. She felt like there was some dark reason behind her quest for perfection, so she decided to try drug assisted psychotherapy. Under the influence of the drugs she either hallucinated or recovered actual memories of repeated violent sexual abuse at the hands of one of her middle school teachers. Despite a heavy saturation of celebrities promoting her book and her whole hometown being aware of the book, no one has corroborated her account and zero other victims have come forward, which was very unexpected since the assaults recounted in her book were brazen and sexual offenders with easy access to kids tend to have multiple victims. There is one classmate of hers who had a rather traumatic childhood and suffered remarkably similar sexual assaults, but at the hands of a completely different teacher. The classmate didn’t need psychedelics to remember the details of her attacks. The attorney for the author says that the Times even trying to fact check the author’s account is an unacceptable attack on a victim of sexual assault.
Anonymous
The nyt article ends rather abruptly.

This was a quote

“Book publishers are not investigators,” said Whitney Frick, Ms. Griffin’s editor at the Dial Press, an imprint of Penguin Random House. “This is Amy’s story. We trust her, and all of our authors, that they are recounting their memories truthfully.”


But I thought after some scandals regarding made up memoirs this changed.

Why didn't the NYT interview psych experts who could talk about the likely veracity of recovered memories in general? Or if memory repression can be so complete?
Anonymous
Did she name the teacher in the book?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Did she name the teacher in the book?


No, but she named him in the book proposal. The NY Times did not name him.
post reply Forum Index » The DCUM Book Club
Message Quick Reply
Go to: