Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

*RICH* >> definitely not right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Agree or disagree, this is really well put: "We deserve better than the lie that our children are the enemy of our success and happiness."

It is disgusting to read people, especially women, wed motherhood to lack of professional success.

Not a lie and not well put. The kids we have are not our enemy. The cells that were aborted were not an enemy, but did stand in the way of the success of some women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Let’s reflect on the fact that all that happened is power is returned to the people through their states!

Different strokes for different folks.

You can have abortion on demand in California or Massachusetts. We can respectfully restrict it here in the Deep South.

We all win.

Right, because poor women in the south can easily pop over to California. They’ll just take the shifts off work, book the plane ticket for them and their children, and pay for a hotel room. Then they’ll pay for the procedure in cash. Right? All so simple! And what about women who find out that their fetus is incompatible with life at the 20 week anatomy scan? They should put their own health and their sanity on the back burner so you can pretend you’re saving someone? Your feelings do not supersede anyone else’s right to obtain medical care. Period.

We now have 4D scans that are used for glamour photos of the baby. Our technology has far surpassed the 20 week scan, to the point where fetal surgery can be done to correct a lot of defects in utero.

I had a baby last year. The doctor specifically told me that they were looking for defects that could not be fixed. You can’t do a thing for a child who has missing or malformed organs. There are many women who find out at the anatomy scan that their child will not survive, no matter the medical intervention. I know some of them. They don’t deserve to be put through legal hell in what is certainly the worst week of their life. You are a terrible person.

I understand BUT they can do these scans much earlier now. They wait until 20 weeks for convenience. By 12 weeks, all organs are already there. There are genetic tests that can be done as early as 6-8 weeks. The states will further refine the laws.

This is good for Democrats as states use the popular vote, not electoral. So if you don’t like a governor, etc, you can vote them out via the popular vote. That’s why Virginia is usually decided by Fairfax and Loudoun.

There are no definitive tests at week 6 or 8. Please spare us this bs. The earliest reliable test is a CVS, done at weeks 10.5 (earliest possible) to week 12, and then you wait 7-10 days for the results. I should know: I live in NYC, had kids later in life and did it with all my pregnancies. One had a trisomy, and we repeated the test at week 14 to be sure. My abortion was not possible until the end of the 14th week, despite me being on top of timelines and having top insurance and access to some of the best prenatal specialists in the world. Most women are not as fortunate and don’t find out until later in their pregnancies.

+1000. I also had a CVS procedure at 12 weeks. Baby was fine but I would have terminated if severe abnormalities were detected. I was born before Roe was passed. In the 70s my family used to donate items to a nearby disabled children’s home. Those places were full of children who could not talk, walk or feed themselves. It was a life of parked wheelchairs in hallways with little human interaction for those children. That’s the kind of place desperate parents had to turn to if a severely disabled child was born to them. Our social safety net has only decreased since then. This is the world we are returning to. I know there is this fantasy that all unwanted babies will be given loving homes but that is not based in reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the left was against slut shaming? But somehow it becomes okay and viral worthy to out a then underage teenager’s sex life and abortion.

No one said she was a slut. She’s a filthy hypocrite. Much worse.

To be fair, Ivanka's abortion would still be legal in states with an incest exception.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Agree or disagree, this is really well put: "We deserve better than the lie that our children are the enemy of our success and happiness."

It is disgusting to read people, especially women, wed motherhood to lack of professional success.

For this to even be a valid opinion then they need to START with providing adequate paid maternity leave, subsidized childcare, and professional protection for mothers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Let’s reflect on the fact that all that happened is power is returned to the people through their states!

Different strokes for different folks.

You can have abortion on demand in California or Massachusetts. We can respectfully restrict it here in the Deep South.

We all win.

Right, because poor women in the south can easily pop over to California. They’ll just take the shifts off work, book the plane ticket for them and their children, and pay for a hotel room. Then they’ll pay for the procedure in cash. Right? All so simple! And what about women who find out that their fetus is incompatible with life at the 20 week anatomy scan? They should put their own health and their sanity on the back burner so you can pretend you’re saving someone? Your feelings do not supersede anyone else’s right to obtain medical care. Period.

We now have 4D scans that are used for glamour photos of the baby. Our technology has far surpassed the 20 week scan, to the point where fetal surgery can be done to correct a lot of defects in utero.

I had a baby last year. The doctor specifically told me that they were looking for defects that could not be fixed. You can’t do a thing for a child who has missing or malformed organs. There are many women who find out at the anatomy scan that their child will not survive, no matter the medical intervention. I know some of them. They don’t deserve to be put through legal hell in what is certainly the worst week of their life. You are a terrible person.

I understand BUT they can do these scans much earlier now. They wait until 20 weeks for convenience. By 12 weeks, all organs are already there. There are genetic tests that can be done as early as 6-8 weeks. The states will further refine the laws.

This is good for Democrats as states use the popular vote, not electoral. So if you don’t like a governor, etc, you can vote them out via the popular vote. That’s why Virginia is usually decided by Fairfax and Loudoun.

There are no definitive tests at week 6 or 8. Please spare us this bs. The earliest reliable test is a CVS, done at weeks 10.5 (earliest possible) to week 12, and then you wait 7-10 days for the results. I should know: I live in NYC, had kids later in life and did it with all my pregnancies. One had a trisomy, and we repeated the test at week 14 to be sure. My abortion was not possible until the end of the 14th week, despite me being on top of timelines and having top insurance and access to some of the best prenatal specialists in the world. Most women are not as fortunate and don’t find out until later in their pregnancies.

+1000. I also had a CVS procedure at 12 weeks. Baby was fine but I would have terminated if severe abnormalities were detected. I was born before Roe was passed. In the 70s my family used to donate items to a nearby disabled children’s home. Those places were full of children who could not talk, walk or feed themselves. It was a life of parked wheelchairs in hallways with little human interaction for those children. That’s the kind of place desperate parents had to turn to if a severely disabled child was born to them. Our social safety net has only decreased since then. This is the world we are returning to. I know there is this fantasy that all unwanted babies will be given loving homes but that is not based in reality.

Exactly.

What is going to happen to all of these severely disabled kids who will end up as wards of the state?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooh, this is too good. Lauren Santo Domingo outs Ivanka on Twitter. I am so happy she is still getting the shun from NYC.

Violating a friend's medical privacy for social media likes is "too good" and makes you "happy"? You and this woman are classless trash. And I say that as someone who despises Ivanka and her closeted husband.

Friends are not bound to medical privacy. I guess she should have known better, shouldn't she.

Your post is a bit right isn't it, when you're then trying to "out" her husband.

Not unless PP somehow **knows** this about Jared

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooh, this is too good. Lauren Santo Domingo outs Ivanka on Twitter. I am so happy she is still getting the shun from NYC.

Violating a friend's medical privacy for social media likes is "too good" and makes you "happy"? You and this woman are classless trash. And I say that as someone who despises Ivanka and her closeted husband.

She was part of a regime that violated and erased the fundamental rights of every woman in this country. She doesn’t get to keep her secrets.

+1. F**k complicit nazi Barbie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought the left was against slut shaming? But somehow it becomes okay and viral worthy to out a then underage teenager’s sex life and abortion.

You’re telling on yourself if you think reporting that someone had an abortion is “slut-shaming” them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ooh, this is too good. Lauren Santo Domingo outs Ivanka on Twitter. I am so happy she is still getting the shun from NYC.

It was deleted but it looked like this:
[twitter]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWHgNZaUAAECF5n?format=jpg&name=large[/twitter]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ooh, this is too good. Lauren Santo Domingo outs Ivanka on Twitter. I am so happy she is still getting the shun from NYC.

Ugh actually like this:

[Anonymous]

Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the left was against slut shaming? But somehow it becomes okay and viral worthy to out a then underage teenager’s sex life and abortion.

You’re telling on yourself if you think reporting that someone had an abortion is “slut-shaming” them.

YOU wouldn't be so gleeful about these comments if you didn't realize it was about something negative concerning Ivanka. Youre a part of the shaming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

+1 Yep. But the younger posters here don't get it.

[Anonymous]

Democrats politicized the court

Excuse me when did that happen?