Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Democrats politicized the court

Excuse me when did that happen?

And was it before or after Reagan appointed the un-American hatchet man famous for the Saturday Night Massacre?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

+1 Yep. But the younger posters here don't get it.

Shove it with the ageism. At 40 I’m still “younger” than the 55 year olds and I have been talking about this since I was a teenager.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

+1 Yep. But the younger posters here don't get it.

Shove it with the ageism. At 40 I’m still “younger” than the 55 year olds and I have been talking about this since I was a teenager.

Sorry, but you weren't present 50 yrs ago

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

When did democrats politicize the court?

Dem states should ignore the court, just like red states have continuously done. If that specific gun regulation in NY is not permitted, try another version and let it work it’s way to the courts. Then write a slightly different one, and so on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

When did democrats politicize the court?

Dem states should ignore the court, just like red states have continuously done. If that specific gun regulation in NY is not permitted, try another version and let it work it’s way to the courts. Then write a slightly different one, and so on.

Substantive due process, roe v wade, interpreting the commerce clause to allow the massive growth of the administrative state, etc. These are all areas where the court gave up on any sort of actual legal analysis and just started issuing political sections with no legitimate justification. Conservatives have been developing originalism as a principled alternative. Liberal justices have no theory of interpretation, just a naked results oriented approach. And now they no longer have the votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:30 years from today someone will change the world. And it will be because their mother’s abortion appointment was canceled.

Doubtful. Unwanted, unloved people rarely amount to much. More crime, misery and a dying planet because there are simply too many of us as it is.

[Anonymous]

22 years from today a mass shooter will change the world and mow down a synagogue. And it will be because we forced his mother to stop her cancer treatments because she was pregnant, and thus medically murdered her so he could be born and because we have accepted that guns can’t be regulated so men with small members can buy large guns. Viva hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:30 years from today someone will change the world. And it will be because their mother’s abortion appointment was canceled.

Doubtful. Unwanted, unloved people rarely amount to much. More crime, misery and a dying planet because there are simply too many of us as it is.

What about Albert Einstein?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

If the Dema were as dirty and unethical as the Reps, they can simply stack the court. Which I would be fully in support of at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

When did democrats politicize the court?

Dem states should ignore the court, just like red states have continuously done. If that specific gun regulation in NY is not permitted, try another version and let it work it’s way to the courts. Then write a slightly different one, and so on.

Substantive due process, roe v wade, interpreting the commerce clause to allow the massive growth of the administrative state, etc. These are all areas where the court gave up on any sort of actual legal analysis and just started issuing political sections with no legitimate justification. Conservatives have been developing originalism as a principled alternative. Liberal justices have no theory of interpretation, just a naked results oriented approach. And now they no longer have the votes.

Originalism is the greatest farce I’ve ever seen. There is nothing principled or even historically accurate about it. The framers would have never tolerated the state interfering with their most precious property (that is - their wives and kids) in the way Texas et al have done. If you have no right to keep the state out of the body of your wife, who cares about your house or your papers? Especially when it’s the PAPISTS they fled from in Europe that are doing it?! (England’s bloody religious battles would have been living memory for them). Nope nope nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

When did democrats politicize the court?

Dem states should ignore the court, just like red states have continuously done. If that specific gun regulation in NY is not permitted, try another version and let it work it’s way to the courts. Then write a slightly different one, and so on.

Substantive due process, roe v wade, interpreting the commerce clause to allow the massive growth of the administrative state, etc. These are all areas where the court gave up on any sort of actual legal analysis and just started issuing political sections with no legitimate justification. Conservatives have been developing originalism as a principled alternative. Liberal justices have no theory of interpretation, just a naked results oriented approach. And now they no longer have the votes.

Originalism is the greatest farce I’ve ever seen. There is nothing principled or even historically accurate about it. The framers would have never tolerated the state interfering with their most precious property (that is - their wives and kids) in the way Texas et al have done. If you have no right to keep the state out of the body of your wife, who cares about your house or your papers? Especially when it’s the PAPISTS they fled from in Europe that are doing it?! (England’s bloody religious battles would have been living memory for them). Nope nope nope.

Why was abortion illegal at the time then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

When did democrats politicize the court?

Dem states should ignore the court, just like red states have continuously done. If that specific gun regulation in NY is not permitted, try another version and let it work it’s way to the courts. Then write a slightly different one, and so on.

Substantive due process, roe v wade, interpreting the commerce clause to allow the massive growth of the administrative state, etc. These are all areas where the court gave up on any sort of actual legal analysis and just started issuing political sections with no legitimate justification. Conservatives have been developing originalism as a principled alternative. Liberal justices have no theory of interpretation, just a naked results oriented approach. And now they no longer have the votes.

Originalism is the greatest farce I’ve ever seen. There is nothing principled or even historically accurate about it. The framers would have never tolerated the state interfering with their most precious property (that is - their wives and kids) in the way Texas et al have done. If you have no right to keep the state out of the body of your wife, who cares about your house or your papers? Especially when it’s the PAPISTS they fled from in Europe that are doing it?! (England’s bloody religious battles would have been living memory for them). Nope nope nope.

Why was abortion illegal at the time then?

It wasn’t illegal. You have been subjected to disinformation. Laws against abortion in the United States did not get imposed until the mid-19th century.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don’t have a vagina or a medical degree your vote shouldn’t count for womens health issues. Further, womens health issues shouldn’t be up for a vote at all. Period.

If you don’t have a penis you cannot judge the actions of a man. Word.

No, because I don’t have male anatomy I can’t judge someone who develops prostate cancer for how he chooses to manage it. It’s a situation that will never apply to me and I don’t know any of the scientific or personal/emotional context, so why would I think MY opinion mattered? If my husband, Heaven forbid, ever gets prostate cancer, the choice of how to treat it will be his choice because it’s his body and he gets to decide what happens to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Banning abortion is tie result of decades of methodical planning by conservatives. The Supreme Court is solidly conservative and will remain so for a generation. Win or lose at the ballot, conservative court will force conservative policies on the nation, just as the formerly liberal court did in the second half of the 1900s. Democrats politicized the court and now conservatives are beating them at their own game. There is nothing democrats can do about it, except adjust to their new reality. These are the facts.

When did democrats politicize the court?

Dem states should ignore the court, just like red states have continuously done. If that specific gun regulation in NY is not permitted, try another version and let it work it’s way to the courts. Then write a slightly different one, and so on.

Substantive due process, roe v wade, interpreting the commerce clause to allow the massive growth of the administrative state, etc. These are all areas where the court gave up on any sort of actual legal analysis and just started issuing political sections with no legitimate justification. Conservatives have been developing originalism as a principled alternative. Liberal justices have no theory of interpretation, just a naked results oriented approach. And now they no longer have the votes.

Originalism is the greatest farce I’ve ever seen. There is nothing principled or even historically accurate about it. The framers would have never tolerated the state interfering with their most precious property (that is - their wives and kids) in the way Texas et al have done. If you have no right to keep the state out of the body of your wife, who cares about your house or your papers? Especially when it’s the PAPISTS they fled from in Europe that are doing it?! (England’s bloody religious battles would have been living memory for them). Nope nope nope.

Why was abortion illegal at the time then?

It wasn’t illegal. You have been subjected to disinformation. Laws against abortion in the United States did not get imposed until the mid-19th century.

Your head is going to explode when you learn when the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the left was against slut shaming? But somehow it becomes okay and viral worthy to out a then underage teenager’s sex life and abortion.

No one said she was a slut. She’s a filthy hypocrite. Much worse.

To be fair, Ivanka's abortion would still be legal in states with an incest exception.

Yes, Trump is gross about his daughter, but incest is never a joke. It is a horrifying form of abuse that ruins a person’s entire life.

— daughter of an incest survivor