New GAO report finds RTO didn't improve efficiency or productivity

[Anonymous]

https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-25-107078.pdf

Some key findings -

Benefits: Telework enhances recruitment and retention, reduces costs for workers and employers, saves commuting time, provides flexibility, and supports workers with disabilities.

Retention & Inclusion: Telework helps recruit and retain talent, especially for those with disabilities or caregiving responsibilities.

Cost Savings: Reducing office space and commuter-related expenses can free up resources.

Productivity & Flexibility: Properly managed telework can maintain efficiency while giving employees greater autonomy.

Yet another MAGA myth busted, that remote workers needed to "show up" and whatever other cutesey but false slogans, that being in the office would improve productivity and efficiency. It didn't - and frankly productivity and efficiency never went down in the first place. And in many cases, productivity and efficiency was better where it came to remote work, because there were less distractions, less burnout, better employee health and wellbeing.

The data has been gathered and analyzed, the experts have been heard from. It's time for your crusty old MAGA relatives (and members of Congress) to shut up and stop peddling their imagined nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Facts don’t matter anymore and everyone associated with that report and its release is going to get fired. That’s how this administration rolls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Facts don’t matter anymore and everyone associated with that report and its release is going to get fired. That’s how this administration rolls.

The bolded is exactly what I came here to say. As soon as inconvenient facts emerge, the people behind them get fired. I hope journalists are tracking the story and will follow up on the staff responsible for the report and will report it if they're fired. That's what happened with several intelligence officials who contradicted the Trump admin lie that the Maduro govt was directing the activities of Tren de Aragua gang members in the US.
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/tulsi-gabbard-intelligence-community-firings-b2751179.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Facts don’t matter anymore and everyone associated with that report and its release is going to get fired. That’s how this administration rolls.

I don't understand how Republicans can live with themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Facts don’t matter anymore and everyone associated with that report and its release is going to get fired. That’s how this administration rolls.

The bolded is exactly what I came here to say. As soon as inconvenient facts emerge, the people behind them get fired. I hope journalists are tracking the story and will follow up on the staff responsible for the report and will report it if they're fired. That's what happened with several intelligence officials who contradicted the Trump admin lie that the Maduro govt was directing the activities of Tren de Aragua gang members in the US.
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/tulsi-gabbard-intelligence-community-firings-b2751179.html

Trump has no control over the GAO. It's a congressional agency.

[Anonymous]

I look forward to returning to WFH once this embarrassment is corrected.

[Anonymous]

Those GAO findings are not all plusses for a nan who suggested a disabled relative should die because they cost a lot to keep alive. Hiring and retention of disabled: minus, woke. Caregivers: either should stay home and have more kids or they are cheating taxpayers by combining care with "work."
Office costs: fire them and you need less space.
Commuting: not tax payer problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those GAO findings are not all plusses for a nan who suggested a disabled relative should die because they cost a lot to keep alive. Hiring and retention of disabled: minus, woke. Caregivers: either should stay home and have more kids or they are cheating taxpayers by combining care with "work."
Office costs: fire them and you need less space.
Commuting: not tax payer problem.

You forgot "and employees should shove a broomstick up their asses when they walk around so that they can sweep the floor as they go."

Boy, you're a real piece of work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-25-107078.pdf

Some key findings -

Benefits: Telework enhances recruitment and retention, reduces costs for workers and employers, saves commuting time, provides flexibility, and supports workers with disabilities.

Retention & Inclusion: Telework helps recruit and retain talent, especially for those with disabilities or caregiving responsibilities.

Cost Savings: Reducing office space and commuter-related expenses can free up resources.

Productivity & Flexibility: Properly managed telework can maintain efficiency while giving employees greater autonomy.

Yet another MAGA myth busted, that remote workers needed to "show up" and whatever other cutesey but false slogans, that being in the office would improve productivity and efficiency. It didn't - and frankly productivity and efficiency never went down in the first place. And in many cases, productivity and efficiency was better where it came to remote work, because there were less distractions, less burnout, better employee health and wellbeing.

The data has been gathered and analyzed, the experts have been heard from. It's time for your crusty old MAGA relatives (and members of Congress) to shut up and stop peddling their imagined nonsense.

Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those GAO findings are not all plusses for a nan who suggested a disabled relative should die because they cost a lot to keep alive. Hiring and retention of disabled: minus, woke. Caregivers: either should stay home and have more kids or they are cheating taxpayers by combining care with "work."
Office costs: fire them and you need less space.
Commuting: not tax payer problem.

You forgot "and employees should shove a broomstick up their asses when they walk around so that they can sweep the floor as they go."

Boy, you're a real piece of work.

The man who said his relative should die is the piece of work. If you don't understand what he thinks you have a surprise every day I guess.

https://time.com/7002003/donald-trump-disabled-americans-all-in-the-family/

[Anonymous]

RTO was intended to be a punishment to Feds. Only an idiot would believe it had anything to do with “efficiency” or “productivity”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:RTO was intended to be a punishment to Feds. Only an idiot would believe it had anything to do with “efficiency” or “productivity”.

This. 100%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Facts don’t matter anymore and everyone associated with that report and its release is going to get fired. That’s how this administration rolls.

I don't understand how Republicans can live with themselves.

Hillary was right. They’re deplorable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those GAO findings are not all plusses for a nan who suggested a disabled relative should die because they cost a lot to keep alive. Hiring and retention of disabled: minus, woke. Caregivers: either should stay home and have more kids or they are cheating taxpayers by combining care with "work."
Office costs: fire them and you need less space.
Commuting: not tax payer problem.

You forgot "and employees should shove a broomstick up their asses when they walk around so that they can sweep the floor as they go."

Boy, you're a real piece of work.

The man who said his relative should die is the piece of work. If you don't understand what he thinks you have a surprise every day I guess.

https://time.com/7002003/donald-trump-disabled-americans-all-in-the-family/

Schlump needs to wrap his head around the fact that, given his age and overall condition, he’s probably a year or two away from being in his relative’s shoes.

Karma’s a b*txh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those GAO findings are not all plusses for a nan who suggested a disabled relative should die because they cost a lot to keep alive. Hiring and retention of disabled: minus, woke. Caregivers: either should stay home and have more kids or they are cheating taxpayers by combining care with "work."
Office costs: fire them and you need less space.
Commuting: not tax payer problem.

Wow your summary of caregiving tells me you haven’t taken care of anyone. You are either childless or a terrible parent. If you think one can work while caring for a small child, you’re a moron. Daycares have a small window for being late to get your child. As a commuter, you have probably ran into surprise delays that have set your ETA back 20 minutes. Daycares charge parents by the minute when you’re late. No commute means easier pick ups. Flexible hours means you can shift your work hours so you can take a child to the doctor instead of taking the entire day off. But explaining this to someone who is so alone in life is pointless. Go ahead and be an @ss. We all know you are lonely and sad.