Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious why some people are so eager to rush to judgment on this case and seem so certain of the accused’s motives.

People are judging him for being there. He went looking for trouble and found it.

This.

Exactly. His motive is irrelevant. He participated in a riot.

[Anonymous]

Sadly, he is going to walk. The judge and the jury are way too sympathetic and the prosecution is boxed.

He shouldn't, but I think it will be reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious why some people are so eager to rush to judgment on this case and seem so certain of the accused’s motives.

People are judging him for being there. He went looking for trouble and found it.

This.

Exactly. His motive is irrelevant. He participated in a riot.

If he was not there how many people would have died?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious why some people are so eager to rush to judgment on this case and seem so certain of the accused’s motives.

People are judging him for being there. He went looking for trouble and found it.

This.

Exactly. His motive is irrelevant. He participated in a riot.

So did the 3 victims, but you seem to hold them blameless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His acting coach did their best, but he is so disgustingly unremorseful. Portraying him as this medic, fire extinguishing hero who was cleaning up graffiti is so far from everything reported by anyone but him. They made this up and signed him on for the ASU nursing program. And now he’s fake crying. I hate this.

Curious as to your motive for rushing to judgement on this case?

Justice.

Be more introspective because justice isn’t served by rushing to judgement.

There’s no rushing here. We’ve heard so much about him and what happened. I waited to hear from him, unusual as it is, and see that the defense decided to make him act like Mother Theresa, who would also be guilty if she did what he did. The people he killed cannot speak nor do they have a defense team supported by racists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh, FFS. There was nothing fake about his break down. He is not an actor. What you saw was raw emotion.

He has been treated like crap by the left and the left media and twitter. What you just saw on the stand was not only a result of what happened that night, but the result of the crap he has been through over a year now. He is 18 years old. And, this trial has been a travesty.

This trial should never have happened. Never.

He will be acquitted, as he should be.

That's a shame. If he was, he could claim someone else told him it was unloaded, then he'd get a pass

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious why some people are so eager to rush to judgment on this case and seem so certain of the accused’s motives.

People are judging him for being there. He went looking for trouble and found it.

This.

Exactly. His motive is irrelevant. He participated in a riot.

So did the 3 victims, but you seem to hold them blameless.

Did those people kill anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious why some people are so eager to rush to judgment on this case and seem so certain of the accused’s motives.

People are judging him for being there. He went looking for trouble and found it.

This.

Exactly. His motive is irrelevant. He participated in a riot.

So did the 3 victims, but you seem to hold them blameless.

They saw a kid brandishing a weapon and feared for their safety. His very presence caused the problem.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His acting coach did their best, but he is so disgustingly unremorseful. Portraying him as this medic, fire extinguishing hero who was cleaning up graffiti is so far from everything reported by anyone but him. They made this up and signed him on for the ASU nursing program. And now he’s fake crying. I hate this.

Curious as to your motive for rushing to judgement on this case?

Justice.

Be more introspective because justice isn’t served by rushing to judgement.

There’s no rushing here. We’ve heard so much about him and what happened. I waited to hear from him, unusual as it is, and see that the defense decided to make him act like Mother Theresa, who would also be guilty if she did what he did. The people he killed cannot speak nor do they have a defense team supported by racists.

Racists? Ahhh…..there’s a hint towards your motivation. Keep exploring that thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious why some people are so eager to rush to judgment on this case and seem so certain of the accused’s motives.

People are judging him for being there. He went looking for trouble and found it.

This.

Exactly. His motive is irrelevant. He participated in a riot.

If he was not there how many people would have died?

Zero, since Rittenhouse killed the only 2 people who died that night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious why some people are so eager to rush to judgment on this case and seem so certain of the accused’s motives.

People are judging him for being there. He went looking for trouble and found it.

This.

Exactly. His motive is irrelevant. He participated in a riot.

So did the 3 victims, but you seem to hold them blameless.

I’ve posted nothing of the sort. I’m the “unintelligent” poster from the top. His victims don’t get any sympathy from me. They shouldn’t have been there either, but they’ve received consequences that were not Kyle’s to dispense. He needs to answer for his actions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wether you believe he had a "right" to be there or not, his defense is self defense. Now look at what the prosecution witnesses have said, not the defense witnesses, but the people arguing it was not self defense.

Victim #1 had threatened to kill him earlier that day and was in the process of trying to take his gun away, when he was shot.

Victim #2 had him in a vulnerable position and was trying to hit him with a deadly weapon when he was shot.

Victim #3 was pointing his own gun at him in a crouched position when he was shot.

That’s is what the prosecution says are the facts. Which one of those 3 would you say is not self defense?

Somehow, his claim of fear of death or bodily injury has outweighed the other people's fear of death or bodily injury, even though, objectively speaking, their fear was justified.

Curious.

Their fear was not objectively justified. KR shot someone who attacked him. KR was running away. How was their fear objectively justified?

Because 2 of the 3 victims viewed him as an active shooter, said they tried to stop him. You’re allowed to go after someone to protect others. They went after him for the same reason he brought a gun to protect people in the community.

Wrong. You are allowed to go after someone to protect others if you reasonably believe they present an immediate, direct risk of causing serious bodily injury to others. The law is very well developed in this area and a person who is retreating (fleeing) is not viewed an immediate, direct risk of harm. Once a person is in retreat, the confrontation is over.

[Anonymous]

Active shooters run to the next location and continue shooting. Active shooters don’t get to run away and claim self defense.

[Anonymous]

The judge is ridiculous. Hard to watch.