+1 |
NP - tired of the unique focus on the United States. Ever hear people browbeating Spain? Portugal? France? China? Japan? Korea? The Caribbean and Brazil imported millions of slaves, but many were worked to death. |
|
You are ridiculous. |
The international students not accused of any crime being kidnapped in broad daylight by men displaying no ID—or anything to reliably identify them as government employees—might differ. |
|
Hahaha!
OP thinks going someplace where no one is allowed to have a gun is going to make her safe. That’s hilarious. All of the most dangerous places I’ve been in the world were places where no one had a gun except for the police and the military. |
OP said their “partner” - the child’s father. Not an ex. Typically, DCUM has focused on the wrong part of this question. This is a custody question, not a politics question. What is in the best interest of the child? Two parents here or one parent there? |
I agree it's tedious in both directions but I don't see any posts here saying "France (or whichever) is the best country in the world!" but I am seeing a multitude of posts saying "America is the best country" and people are branded disloyal for saying they would prefer to live elsewhere for any reason. |
|
I agree this is a custody question and OP should not make it political.
Can OP demonstrate and quantify that the child's life will be significantly better in the other country? Are there supportive extended family members there (including similar aged cousins) where the child will develop relationships? To include speaking in that language? Does the country offer free health insurance, free college educations? Would the child live in a home that was free from mortgage (like a family home) or at a significantly lower cost? Would that lower cost home allow the parent more free time with the child? Can the child's other parent afford to visit child in the country with some frequency? At least once a quarter? Would they be willing to give it a trial for a year? These are the practical things to look at - not politics. |
+1. It makes me wonder if people zoned out during history class or otherwise were never interested in the subject. It’s a bit self absorbed and far fetched to claim that it’s so different and extreme now. I think people in every time period say this anyway so I suppose it’s not unusual. Continue to push for what you think is right but get a grip. |
But is that the leading cause of death for children (under 18)? Yeah, I didn't think so. |
The administration is suspending due process for wider and wider swaths of the population. You are foolish if you don’t see that as the threat it is. It is not utterly unprecedented, but it is a perfectly good reason to be considering flight. It often ends poorly when governments start down this path—especially when there is no one acting as a check or balance. -US historian |
Oops. |
Exactly. |
Inconvenient truth. Face it, OP. |