TJ Class of 2025

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not impressive and definitely a change from previous years. A sampling from the print Senior edition of TJ Today:

UVA - 20
VT - 13
W&M - 14
GMU - 21

Georgetown - 8
Princeton - 4
Duke - 2
Chapel Hill - 1
Carnegie Mellon - 4
Penn - 4
Cornell - 5
MIT - 2
Harvard - 5
Chicago - 9
Purdue - 19
Michigan - 5
Stanford - 1


How does TJ 2025 college admission compare with other high schools, like Langley, McLean and Woodson? It was said both Langley and Woodson have graduates going to MIT. What about other top universities?


Going from the Instagram pages, Langley and McLean each had at least 3 kids going to Stanford, McLean had one or more kids going to MIT and all the Ivies except Harvard, and Langley had one or more kids going to MIT and all the Ivies except Penn and Princeton.


Really?


No, it's just sour grapes fake news.


No, it's not.

https://www.instagram.com/langleydecisions25/

https://www.instagram.com/mcleancommitments/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not impressive and definitely a change from previous years. A sampling from the print Senior edition of TJ Today:

UVA - 20
VT - 13
W&M - 14
GMU - 21

Georgetown - 8
Princeton - 4
Duke - 2
Chapel Hill - 1
Carnegie Mellon - 4
Penn - 4
Cornell - 5
MIT - 2
Harvard - 5
Chicago - 9
Purdue - 19
Michigan - 5
Stanford - 1


How does TJ 2025 college admission compare with other high schools, like Langley, McLean and Woodson? It was said both Langley and Woodson have graduates going to MIT. What about other top universities?


Going from the Instagram pages, Langley and McLean each had at least 3 kids going to Stanford, McLean had one or more kids going to MIT and all the Ivies except Harvard, and Langley had one or more kids going to MIT and all the Ivies except Penn and Princeton.


Legacy, urm, fgli, athlete, and other hooks. This is how they are all getting in, TJ and base. The schools are not doing anything special.


But they are.

I know the kids that went to MIT last year and they were not legacy.
I know about half the kids that went to IVY+ and maybe 2 or 3 were legacy at the school they ended up going to.
There are smart kids at TJ.


MIT doesn't consider legacy status.
TJ Class of 2025 had very good Ivy+/T20 results. Sure, a bunch did have cross admits. Most are Asian (all Asian MIT admits). A fair number are white and a few URM.


I am responding to the previous poster that said the TJ kids are getting into ivy+ because they are legacy URM, FGLI or athletes.

I responded specifically with MIT because they do not consider legacy. These kids are getting in because they are smart and hard working.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not impressive and definitely a change from previous years. A sampling from the print Senior edition of TJ Today:

UVA - 20
VT - 13
W&M - 14
GMU - 21

Georgetown - 8
Princeton - 4
Duke - 2
Chapel Hill - 1
Carnegie Mellon - 4
Penn - 4
Cornell - 5
MIT - 2
Harvard - 5
Chicago - 9
Purdue - 19
Michigan - 5
Stanford - 1


How does TJ 2025 college admission compare with other high schools, like Langley, McLean and Woodson? It was said both Langley and Woodson have graduates going to MIT. What about other top universities?


Going from the Instagram pages, Langley and McLean each had at least 3 kids going to Stanford, McLean had one or more kids going to MIT and all the Ivies except Harvard, and Langley had one or more kids going to MIT and all the Ivies except Penn and Princeton.


Legacy, urm, fgli, athlete, and other hooks. This is how they are all getting in, TJ and base. The schools are not doing anything special.


But they are.

I know the kids that went to MIT last year and they were not legacy.
I know about half the kids that went to IVY+ and maybe 2 or 3 were legacy at the school they ended up going to.
There are smart kids at TJ.


MIT doesn't consider legacy status.
TJ Class of 2025 had very good Ivy+/T20 results. Sure, a bunch did have cross admits. Most are Asian (all Asian MIT admits). A fair number are white and a few URM.


I am responding to the previous poster that said the TJ kids are getting into ivy+ because they are legacy URM, FGLI or athletes.

I responded specifically with MIT because they do not consider legacy. These kids are getting in because they are smart and hard working.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not impressive and definitely a change from previous years. A sampling from the print Senior edition of TJ Today:

UVA - 20
VT - 13
W&M - 14
GMU - 21

Georgetown - 8
Princeton - 4
Duke - 2
Chapel Hill - 1
Carnegie Mellon - 4
Penn - 4
Cornell - 5
MIT - 2
Harvard - 5
Chicago - 9
Purdue - 19
Michigan - 5
Stanford - 1


How does TJ 2025 college admission compare with other high schools, like Langley, McLean and Woodson? It was said both Langley and Woodson have graduates going to MIT. What about other top universities?


Going from the Instagram pages, Langley and McLean each had at least 3 kids going to Stanford, McLean had one or more kids going to MIT and all the Ivies except Harvard, and Langley had one or more kids going to MIT and all the Ivies except Penn and Princeton.


Legacy, urm, fgli, athlete, and other hooks. This is how they are all getting in, TJ and base. The schools are not doing anything special.


But they are.

I know the kids that went to MIT last year and they were not legacy.
I know about half the kids that went to IVY+ and maybe 2 or 3 were legacy at the school they ended up going to.
There are smart kids at TJ.


MIT doesn't consider legacy status.
TJ Class of 2025 had very good Ivy+/T20 results. Sure, a bunch did have cross admits. Most are Asian (all Asian MIT admits). A fair number are white and a few URM.


I am responding to the previous poster that said the TJ kids are getting into ivy+ because they are legacy URM, FGLI or athletes.

I responded specifically with MIT because they do not consider legacy. These kids are getting in because they are smart and hard working.


Athletes? Is there something i don't know about TJ?

Does their holistic admissions allow them toi select for athleticism?
Anonymous
What we know at this stage is where about 55% of the Class of 2025 reported that they matriculated. We have no idea about:

1) where the other 230-odd graduates ended up matriculating;
2) what schools they and the 269 reporters were admitted to even if they could not attend for whatever reason (almost certainly financial).

Based on the annual signing ceremony, it appears that the number of seniors going on to play college athletics did not change meaningfully, and there isn't any evidence to suggest that TJ's been doing especially better in athletics since the changes to the admissions process.

The bottom line is that TJ is still very much TJ, and the sense is that the 2025s were probably the least prepared class of all of the ones that we've seen since the changes because:

a) they were deeply impacted by COVID in their late middle school years;
b) the school had not yet figured out how to adjust for their varied backgrounds and lack of community knowledge of how to navigate TJ;
c) they had a greater advantage in the admissions process re: numerical bonuses for coming from underrepresented schools - a bonus which has since been eliminated.

You'll continue to see improvements as the classes continue to balance out over the next few years, is my guess.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What we know at this stage is where about 55% of the Class of 2025 reported that they matriculated. We have no idea about:

1) where the other 230-odd graduates ended up matriculating;
2) what schools they and the 269 reporters were admitted to even if they could not attend for whatever reason (almost certainly financial).

Based on the annual signing ceremony, it appears that the number of seniors going on to play college athletics did not change meaningfully, and there isn't any evidence to suggest that TJ's been doing especially better in athletics since the changes to the admissions process.

The bottom line is that TJ is still very much TJ, and the sense is that the 2025s were probably the least prepared class of all of the ones that we've seen since the changes because:

a) they were deeply impacted by COVID in their late middle school years;
b) the school had not yet figured out how to adjust for their varied backgrounds and lack of community knowledge of how to navigate TJ;
c) they had a greater advantage in the admissions process re: numerical bonuses for coming from underrepresented schools - a bonus which has since been eliminated.

You'll continue to see improvements as the classes continue to balance out over the next few years, is my guess.

2025 had 25% FARMs. The follow on years had much less FARMs, like 10%. Scores and outcomes will improve accordingly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What we know at this stage is where about 55% of the Class of 2025 reported that they matriculated. We have no idea about:

1) where the other 230-odd graduates ended up matriculating;
2) what schools they and the 269 reporters were admitted to even if they could not attend for whatever reason (almost certainly financial).

Based on the annual signing ceremony, it appears that the number of seniors going on to play college athletics did not change meaningfully, and there isn't any evidence to suggest that TJ's been doing especially better in athletics since the changes to the admissions process.

The bottom line is that TJ is still very much TJ, and the sense is that the 2025s were probably the least prepared class of all of the ones that we've seen since the changes because:

a) they were deeply impacted by COVID in their late middle school years;
b) the school had not yet figured out how to adjust for their varied backgrounds and lack of community knowledge of how to navigate TJ;
c) they had a greater advantage in the admissions process re: numerical bonuses for coming from underrepresented schools - a bonus which has since been eliminated.

You'll continue to see improvements as the classes continue to balance out over the next few years, is my guess.

2025 had 25% FARMs. The follow on years had much less FARMs, like 10%. Scores and outcomes will improve accordingly.


They reduced the weighting of the"experience factors" but they still need as merit filter. They should go back to testing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not impressive and definitely a change from previous years. A sampling from the print Senior edition of TJ Today:

UVA - 20
VT - 13
W&M - 14
GMU - 21

Georgetown - 8
Princeton - 4
Duke - 2
Chapel Hill - 1
Carnegie Mellon - 4
Penn - 4
Cornell - 5
MIT - 2
Harvard - 5
Chicago - 9
Purdue - 19
Michigan - 5
Stanford - 1


How does TJ 2025 college admission compare with other high schools, like Langley, McLean and Woodson? It was said both Langley and Woodson have graduates going to MIT. What about other top universities?


I am a big critic of the new TJ admissions process but there is really no comparison between TJ and any other VA high school.


Yes, at TJ you're competing againt the county's top 1.5% whereas the other schools it's just the bottom 98.5%.


You sound like an idiot. Truly. It’s the same as thinking your TJ kid would be top 10 at his base school.


I know how dare they bring objective metrics into this disucussion. Sour grapes should be the only factor! :D

DP

The 1.5% quota is not "objective metrics". It's a school based quota.


Yes, just because they only select the top 1.5% of students doesn't mean they're the 1.5%! :D
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What we know at this stage is where about 55% of the Class of 2025 reported that they matriculated. We have no idea about:

1) where the other 230-odd graduates ended up matriculating;
2) what schools they and the 269 reporters were admitted to even if they could not attend for whatever reason (almost certainly financial).

Based on the annual signing ceremony, it appears that the number of seniors going on to play college athletics did not change meaningfully, and there isn't any evidence to suggest that TJ's been doing especially better in athletics since the changes to the admissions process.

The bottom line is that TJ is still very much TJ, and the sense is that the 2025s were probably the least prepared class of all of the ones that we've seen since the changes because:

a) they were deeply impacted by COVID in their late middle school years;
b) the school had not yet figured out how to adjust for their varied backgrounds and lack of community knowledge of how to navigate TJ;
c) they had a greater advantage in the admissions process re: numerical bonuses for coming from underrepresented schools - a bonus which has since been eliminated.

You'll continue to see improvements as the classes continue to balance out over the next few years, is my guess.

2025 had 25% FARMs. The follow on years had much less FARMs, like 10%. Scores and outcomes will improve accordingly.


Many families whose children are admitted to elite schools do not attend because of the cost. This is especially true for less affluent families. Previously, TJ admissions was heavily favoring affluencet families that could afford ivyies. This is less true today. Many who could get into places like HYP end up at UVA because of financial constraints.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not impressive and definitely a change from previous years. A sampling from the print Senior edition of TJ Today:

UVA - 20
VT - 13
W&M - 14
GMU - 21

Georgetown - 8
Princeton - 4
Duke - 2
Chapel Hill - 1
Carnegie Mellon - 4
Penn - 4
Cornell - 5
MIT - 2
Harvard - 5
Chicago - 9
Purdue - 19
Michigan - 5
Stanford - 1


How does TJ 2025 college admission compare with other high schools, like Langley, McLean and Woodson? It was said both Langley and Woodson have graduates going to MIT. What about other top universities?


I am a big critic of the new TJ admissions process but there is really no comparison between TJ and any other VA high school.


Yes, at TJ you're competing againt the county's top 1.5% whereas the other schools it's just the bottom 98.5%.


You sound like an idiot. Truly. It’s the same as thinking your TJ kid would be top 10 at his base school.


I know how dare they bring objective metrics into this disucussion. Sour grapes should be the only factor! :D

DP

The 1.5% quota is not "objective metrics". It's a school based quota.


Yes, just because they only select the top 1.5% of students doesn't mean they're the 1.5%! :D


DP. Your reading comprehension is seriously lacking.
Anonymous
Accidentally bump into an old thread while looking for certain information.
The thread tittle is about TJ class of 2019 college admissions result (I can send a link if it needed to believe).
It is basically copy cat of this thread, only that it was still old admission system. Same type of comment “not impressive” or “base school is better”, cheating comment and bunches of snarky comments and racist tone.

Admissions can change many times, but people character is impossible to change.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What we know at this stage is where about 55% of the Class of 2025 reported that they matriculated. We have no idea about:

1) where the other 230-odd graduates ended up matriculating;
2) what schools they and the 269 reporters were admitted to even if they could not attend for whatever reason (almost certainly financial).

Based on the annual signing ceremony, it appears that the number of seniors going on to play college athletics did not change meaningfully, and there isn't any evidence to suggest that TJ's been doing especially better in athletics since the changes to the admissions process.

The bottom line is that TJ is still very much TJ, and the sense is that the 2025s were probably the least prepared class of all of the ones that we've seen since the changes because:

a) they were deeply impacted by COVID in their late middle school years;
b) the school had not yet figured out how to adjust for their varied backgrounds and lack of community knowledge of how to navigate TJ;
c) they had a greater advantage in the admissions process re: numerical bonuses for coming from underrepresented schools - a bonus which has since been eliminated.

You'll continue to see improvements as the classes continue to balance out over the next few years, is my guess.

2025 had 25% FARMs. The follow on years had much less FARMs, like 10%. Scores and outcomes will improve accordingly.


Many families whose children are admitted to elite schools do not attend because of the cost. This is especially true for less affluent families. Previously, TJ admissions was heavily favoring affluencet families that could afford ivyies. This is less true today. Many who could get into places like HYP end up at UVA because of financial constraints.


And some may choose GMU over other colleges because they can continue to live at home.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Accidentally bump into an old thread while looking for certain information.
The thread tittle is about TJ class of 2019 college admissions result (I can send a link if it needed to believe).
It is basically copy cat of this thread, only that it was still old admission system. Same type of comment “not impressive” or “base school is better”, cheating comment and bunches of snarky comments and racist tone.

Admissions can change many times, but people character is impossible to change.



??

Cheating is a common issue at HSs everywhere. It has been openly acknowledged as an issue for TJ for more than a decade.

Articles from 2006 to 2023 about cheating at TJ:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2006/05/03/va-principal-issues-apology-for-remarks-span-classbankheadlinking-ethnicity-and-cheating-was-wrong-fairfax-leader-saysspan/01cfcf99-d02f-4c11-b68e-e4997cf6d972/
https://www.tjtoday.org/1613/opinion/one-question-pervades-classroom-teaching-and-school-activities/
https://www.tjtoday.org/4390/opinion/teachers-need-to-enforce-tj-honor-code/
https://www.tjtoday.org/19690/uncategorized/integrity-violation-lecture-reminds-students-of-the-cost-of-cheating/
https://www.tjtoday.org/27956/uncategorized/midterms-week-breeding-grounds-for-rampant-cheating/
https://www.tjtoday.org/32413/opinion/stop-idolizing-elite-colleges/
https://www.tjtoday.org/36291/features/the-inside-of-integrity/

DCUM anecdote about widespread cheating from 2013:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/60/329043.page
"TJ parent here - At back to school night several of the teachers described the steps they take to prevent cheating. A science teacher said that they have learned there are so-called "tutors" who have large files of all the old tests given at TJ. So this year they are creating every test from scratch, with 4 completely different versions as the classes meet during 4 different time periods."

Interview with former TJ principal in 2006 (also discusses "gaming" the admissions test):
https://www.washingtonian.com/2006/09/01/thomas-jefferson-high-school-interview-with-principal-elizabeth-lodal/
"Unfortunately, T.J. has helped spawn a huge test-preparation industry in this region. Look in the newspapers—you’ll find test prep for both the SATs and for T.J.

Some parents start this T.J. prep early. Some local churches have Sunday-school classes focused on getting into T.J. that start in kindergarten and go through elementary school. Wealthy parents can spend $600 a pop to learn how to get in here.

Isn’t there something wrong with that?
Yes.

Why don’t you constantly change the exam so no one can game it?
The admissions office tries to do that."



"How pervasive is cheating?
Students tell me it’s more pervasive than adults know.
It is a huge challenge for teachers and principals—not just here but at every school.

Given our student population, cheating techniques can be very sophisticated. We’ve tried to create an antidote via a robust ethics program. We bolster students offended by cheating and strengthen everyone’s will to resist it. We hold up ethical models and highlight positive examples.

When I got here, the first group of students to visit me were student leaders offended by the pervasiveness of cheating. They had drafted an honor code. The school eventually adopted that honor code, written by students. The student government is now investigating the creation of an honor council to help enforce and strengthen the honor code.

Our program Big Sibs matches every freshman with a “sibling”—an upper-level student who helps navigate the waters. Another initiative, Building a Better Community, or BBC, assists with programs about ethics. We feature ethics panels of highly respected students and adults who speak out against cheating."



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Accidentally bump into an old thread while looking for certain information.
The thread tittle is about TJ class of 2019 college admissions result (I can send a link if it needed to believe).
It is basically copy cat of this thread, only that it was still old admission system. Same type of comment “not impressive” or “base school is better”, cheating comment and bunches of snarky comments and racist tone.

Admissions can change many times, but people character is impossible to change.



??

Cheating is a common issue at HSs everywhere. It has been openly acknowledged as an issue for TJ for more than a decade.

Articles from 2006 to 2023 about cheating at TJ:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2006/05/03/va-principal-issues-apology-for-remarks-span-classbankheadlinking-ethnicity-and-cheating-was-wrong-fairfax-leader-saysspan/01cfcf99-d02f-4c11-b68e-e4997cf6d972/
https://www.tjtoday.org/1613/opinion/one-question-pervades-classroom-teaching-and-school-activities/
https://www.tjtoday.org/4390/opinion/teachers-need-to-enforce-tj-honor-code/
https://www.tjtoday.org/19690/uncategorized/integrity-violation-lecture-reminds-students-of-the-cost-of-cheating/
https://www.tjtoday.org/27956/uncategorized/midterms-week-breeding-grounds-for-rampant-cheating/
https://www.tjtoday.org/32413/opinion/stop-idolizing-elite-colleges/
https://www.tjtoday.org/36291/features/the-inside-of-integrity/

DCUM anecdote about widespread cheating from 2013:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/60/329043.page
"TJ parent here - At back to school night several of the teachers described the steps they take to prevent cheating. A science teacher said that they have learned there are so-called "tutors" who have large files of all the old tests given at TJ. So this year they are creating every test from scratch, with 4 completely different versions as the classes meet during 4 different time periods."

Interview with former TJ principal in 2006 (also discusses "gaming" the admissions test):
https://www.washingtonian.com/2006/09/01/thomas-jefferson-high-school-interview-with-principal-elizabeth-lodal/
"Unfortunately, T.J. has helped spawn a huge test-preparation industry in this region. Look in the newspapers—you’ll find test prep for both the SATs and for T.J.

Some parents start this T.J. prep early. Some local churches have Sunday-school classes focused on getting into T.J. that start in kindergarten and go through elementary school. Wealthy parents can spend $600 a pop to learn how to get in here.

Isn’t there something wrong with that?
Yes.

Why don’t you constantly change the exam so no one can game it?
The admissions office tries to do that."



"How pervasive is cheating?
Students tell me it’s more pervasive than adults know.
It is a huge challenge for teachers and principals—not just here but at every school.

Given our student population, cheating techniques can be very sophisticated. We’ve tried to create an antidote via a robust ethics program. We bolster students offended by cheating and strengthen everyone’s will to resist it. We hold up ethical models and highlight positive examples.

When I got here, the first group of students to visit me were student leaders offended by the pervasiveness of cheating. They had drafted an honor code. The school eventually adopted that honor code, written by students. The student government is now investigating the creation of an honor council to help enforce and strengthen the honor code.

Our program Big Sibs matches every freshman with a “sibling”—an upper-level student who helps navigate the waters. Another initiative, Building a Better Community, or BBC, assists with programs about ethics. We feature ethics panels of highly respected students and adults who speak out against cheating."





Yeah my point is, its been going on for years. It is not recent, and regardless old or new admission certain people always have something to attack.

I wish people just leave this kids alone, regardless they went to Harvard or local CC or not even go to colleges. That is their lives and we know nothing. It is not ours to judge them
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Accidentally bump into an old thread while looking for certain information.
The thread tittle is about TJ class of 2019 college admissions result (I can send a link if it needed to believe).
It is basically copy cat of this thread, only that it was still old admission system. Same type of comment “not impressive” or “base school is better”, cheating comment and bunches of snarky comments and racist tone.

Admissions can change many times, but people character is impossible to change.



??

Cheating is a common issue at HSs everywhere. It has been openly acknowledged as an issue for TJ for more than a decade.

Articles from 2006 to 2023 about cheating at TJ:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2006/05/03/va-principal-issues-apology-for-remarks-span-classbankheadlinking-ethnicity-and-cheating-was-wrong-fairfax-leader-saysspan/01cfcf99-d02f-4c11-b68e-e4997cf6d972/
https://www.tjtoday.org/1613/opinion/one-question-pervades-classroom-teaching-and-school-activities/
https://www.tjtoday.org/4390/opinion/teachers-need-to-enforce-tj-honor-code/
https://www.tjtoday.org/19690/uncategorized/integrity-violation-lecture-reminds-students-of-the-cost-of-cheating/
https://www.tjtoday.org/27956/uncategorized/midterms-week-breeding-grounds-for-rampant-cheating/
https://www.tjtoday.org/32413/opinion/stop-idolizing-elite-colleges/
https://www.tjtoday.org/36291/features/the-inside-of-integrity/

DCUM anecdote about widespread cheating from 2013:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/60/329043.page
"TJ parent here - At back to school night several of the teachers described the steps they take to prevent cheating. A science teacher said that they have learned there are so-called "tutors" who have large files of all the old tests given at TJ. So this year they are creating every test from scratch, with 4 completely different versions as the classes meet during 4 different time periods."

Interview with former TJ principal in 2006 (also discusses "gaming" the admissions test):
https://www.washingtonian.com/2006/09/01/thomas-jefferson-high-school-interview-with-principal-elizabeth-lodal/
"Unfortunately, T.J. has helped spawn a huge test-preparation industry in this region. Look in the newspapers—you’ll find test prep for both the SATs and for T.J.

Some parents start this T.J. prep early. Some local churches have Sunday-school classes focused on getting into T.J. that start in kindergarten and go through elementary school. Wealthy parents can spend $600 a pop to learn how to get in here.

Isn’t there something wrong with that?
Yes.

Why don’t you constantly change the exam so no one can game it?
The admissions office tries to do that."



"How pervasive is cheating?
Students tell me it’s more pervasive than adults know.
It is a huge challenge for teachers and principals—not just here but at every school.

Given our student population, cheating techniques can be very sophisticated. We’ve tried to create an antidote via a robust ethics program. We bolster students offended by cheating and strengthen everyone’s will to resist it. We hold up ethical models and highlight positive examples.

When I got here, the first group of students to visit me were student leaders offended by the pervasiveness of cheating. They had drafted an honor code. The school eventually adopted that honor code, written by students. The student government is now investigating the creation of an honor council to help enforce and strengthen the honor code.

Our program Big Sibs matches every freshman with a “sibling”—an upper-level student who helps navigate the waters. Another initiative, Building a Better Community, or BBC, assists with programs about ethics. We feature ethics panels of highly respected students and adults who speak out against cheating."





Yeah my point is, its been going on for years. It is not recent, and regardless old or new admission certain people always have something to attack.

I wish people just leave this kids alone, regardless they went to Harvard or local CC or not even go to colleges. That is their lives and we know nothing. It is not ours to judge them


We are not judging them. We are judging the new admissions system.
post reply Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: