Seems a few parents have gotten their Cogat scores in folders. The rest of us are anticipating getting them soon. As results trickle in, we should keep all the data together
Cogat: NNAT: Pyramid: In Pool (yes/no): |
Cogat: 139
NNAT: 118 Pyramid: Falls Church In Pool (yes/no): Yes |
Cogat: 136
NNAT: 128 Pyramid: West Potomac In pool: no We parent referred so we'll see. |
Cogat: 149
NNAT: 160 Pyramid: Westfields In Pool (yes/no): Yes |
Cogat: 145
NNAT: 158 Pyramid: Woodson In Pool (yes/no): yes |
Cogat: 142
NNAT: 128 Pyramid: South Lakes In Pool (yes/no): Yes Also parent referred. |
I know these numbers don't really mean much. But my data loving brain appreciates this (even though I'm certain this reporting is biased), so thank you to those who have shared. |
Cogat: 145
NNAT: 140 Pyramid: Edison In pool: yes |
I wish there were a lot more respondents so that the data could actually be useful, but with so little there's only so much you can infer. |
Cogat: 145
NNAT: 125 Pyramid: Marshall In Pool: Yes Also parent referred. |
Lots of us are waiting for the cogat results. I expect more responses once those come in. |
Seriously, for what purpose? So you can gloat or feel crappy? Is this about easing your anxiety as a parent? Are you preparing a report. I truly do not understand what knowing some random, anonymous scores of 7 year olds will do for you. Please explain why "we should keep all the data together." |
There’s a thread with all the people who want to respond every year. And for the looky-loos like you. |
Cogat: 135
NNAT: 124 Pyramid: Langley In Pool (yes/no): no We parent referred so we'll see. |
I find it interesting what the different thresholds are. My kid is in AAP in MS so I don’t have any thing to gain. I just find the different thresholds fascinating. |