Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:families with U-littles who are playing for fun for the most part do not care which club they sign up with. convenience and playing with kids in the same neighborhood is #1, #2, and #3
Thank you, and since the majority of everything (players, costs, revenue) don't come from "u-littles", I don't really care especially since my kids aren't "u-littles". Thanks for wasting my money and thousands of dollars LMVSC.
So....I don't understand this statement, it would seem to me to be the opposite. Also because once kids leave a program, they also don't tend to come back, but let's just talk numbers. The programs my kids are in tend to have 3, sometimes even 4 programs. At 11/12 kids in each, thats 35-45 kids paying pretty close if not the same amount as any other age. That shortens up a bit as numbers go up, but number of kids tends to stay around that so pick how long you want to call them ulittles, but at least 2-3 years of that forms your basis for the future (revenue, talent, whatever). Our kids at 11v11 tend to have 2 teams so there's again 32-40 kids. So maybe the ulittles don't get that much attention and maybe team fees don't add up as much, so the parent cost isn't as high - but the revenue to the club is the same if not more before you even get into forming the basis of your clubs future talent.
Now - LMVSC has a fairly good advantage to replacing players being so close to belvoir, there are kids moving in and out of the area all the time. But downside is that I assume if they get families from Belvoir, then they also lose them in 2-3 years as well so fairly transient. I'm making a big assumption there though, we're not actually at LMVSC to know what kids might have parents stationed at Belvoir, maybe there's a different club that focuses on that market.